March Stundie Nominations

carlitos said:
Hollow moon? There is a Swiss Cheese joke in there somewhere.

Really - you could insert almost any conspiracy theory into this format:
Click to expand...

Wow. So it appears that if one accepts inaccuracies and falsehoods as fact, one can pretty much prove anything one wants, and win any debate. What a concept!
 
Interesting that they actually seem to believe man WENT to the moon 6 times. Don't most of these CT'ers claim that was a hoax?
 
sylvan8798 said:
Interesting that they actually seem to believe man WENT to the moon 6 times. Don't most of these CT'ers claim that was a hoax?
Click to expand...

Some of them have compartmentalised minds*, keeping the theories from clashing.

*I guess we all have to some extent or other, but some more than others.
 
I nominated Henri who is trying to explain the red/grey chips and what they had to do

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5723349&postcount=642
FHC said:
Actually at the WTC, thermite was only needed to insure the heating effect that the jet fuel fires couldnt produce: soften the steel columns at the floors of the impact, not necessarily melt them!
Click to expand...

and this gem
The chips are very thin but there are photos strongly suggesting that the thermite was applied in a multilayered red/grey/red/grey.... that could reach millimeters in total thickness.... so sorry again but i really see no problem with this scenario.
Click to expand...

yes you read that right. The dastardly NWO knew which floors they would fly jets into. They knew the jets would cause massive fires, but the fires would be too weak to bring down the building, so they had to add in super duper sekret nanothermite to just "help" it along.

But of coure he couldn't replicate any of the findings from the jones bentham fail. Go figure.
 
Last edited:
CT History theories make me cringe sometimes.

haukipesukone said:
I was just thinking Masons or some other occult group already knew how to read hieroglyphics, but there were some Egyptian mysteries they wanted studied. They couldn't just say "hey, we can read those weird signs". Instead they made the Rosetta Stone and planted it somewhere, and one of them "found" it. That's how other, unwitting, scholars could start studying Egypt too and provide their findings to the people who planted the stone.

Any comments?
Click to expand...
aratron said:
i do find it a bit too conveneient that the rosetta stone is just discovered and then unlocks the secrets very bizarre.
Click to expand...

aratron said:
oh god yeah.

it was probably in the Vatican for a thousand years.

then suddenly found in the sand.

you would think that wherever it was found there would be other similar findings of an equal significance.
Click to expand...
pri01 said:
Even if it is genuine, how do we know that the interpretation is honest and none corrupt?

There are many excellent researchers on this forum who are questioning the official version of events. Information about incorrect time lines etc. I find it really difficult to accept historical evidence as accurate and true in the context that it is being presented right now.

I maybe totally wrong though. There are many academics out there who can absolutely say and provide evidence that the rosetta stone is the genuine article. They may be able to present absolute concrete evidence in that their interpretation is accurate and robust.

However, what are the chances that they have all been fed a big fat lie?

I say this because ancient Egyptian history covers a period of many thousand years. Would it be possible that the language used may have changed a little over that length of time?

Even the English language has evolved to resemble something that our ancestors of 500 years ago would be unable to understand today.
Click to expand...




http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=104578
 
Last edited:
TruthersLie said:
I nominated Henri who is trying to explain the red/grey chips and what they had to do

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5723349&postcount=642
FHC said:
Actually at the WTC, thermite was only needed to insure the heating effect that the jet fuel fires couldnt produce: soften the steel columns at the floors of the impact, not necessarily melt them!
Click to expand...

and this gem
The chips are very thin but there are photos strongly suggesting that the thermite was applied in a multilayered red/grey/red/grey.... that could reach millimeters in total thickness.... so sorry again but i really see no problem with this scenario.
Click to expand...

yes you read that right. The dastardly NWO knew which floors they would fly jets into. They knew the jets would cause massive fires, but the fires would be too weak to bring down the building, so they had to add in super duper sekret nanothermite to just "help" it along.

But of coure he couldn't replicate any of the findings from the jones bentham fail. Go figure.
Click to expand...


He's stealing Max Photon's "Heat Weakening" hypothesis! That bastard!

Max was the only truther who ever really tried to come up with a plausible scenario that fit the available evidence, and now they don't even remember him :mad:


Come back, Max, we miss you!
 
Oh, the Rosetta Stone for the win! It scores for originality as well as everything else!

Rolfe.
 
Agreed.Unless something of really extrodinary craziness is posted, the Rosetta Stone gets my #1 place vote.

And Napoleon was so in on the conspiracy.......
 
Wait, what?

walkyrie said:
Remember the World Trade Center did not collapse. It was pulverized. The buildings did not pancake and there are no pancaked floors as a result. The tops of the buildings did not remain intact to crush the intact lower 80 percent of the building . These buildings exploded out laterally . Can you tell the difference between a gravity collapse and jumping explosive demolition? Here is the North Tower Exploding. Narrated by physicist David Chandler, who FORCED NIST to correct their data and admit to free-fall for WTC 7. (Which by itself proves explosives were used). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSApOavkHg8
Hat Tips! Thanks!
Click to expand...

Arus808 said:
everything in this post is wrong and/or a lie.
Click to expand...

walkyrie said:
And therefore you are a DISINFORMATION agent
Click to expand...
 
I think walkyrie is confused about who exactly is the disinformation agent...
 
The Rosetta Stone thing has got to win. I can't even fathom why someone would fake it or hide it then reveal it to the world. Not to mention there's a bunch of people getting worked up about something with not one piece of evidence that some prat dreamt up and threw up onto the intertubes. Flawless.
 
Travis said:
Maybe we should give him his drivers license back so he'll spend less time on the internet and more time crashing his car on dead level straightaways.
Click to expand...

Just to clarify I'm not advocating that he go out and hurt himself.

Sledge said:
The Rosetta Stone thing has got to win. I can't even fathom why someone would fake it or hide it then reveal it to the world. Not to mention there's a bunch of people getting worked up about something with not one piece of evidence that some prat dreamt up and threw up onto the intertubes. Flawless.
Click to expand...

What I find amusing is that he thinks the very fact it was "found" and provided answers was suspicious. It's the same meme where Truthers think every bit of evidence implicating Muslim Radicals is "too convenient."
 
Dear god...

iks83 said:
For example look how many different varieties of dogs there are. Now lets say the planet got reseted and in 30000 years people dig up all different kinds of dog skulls. Now they line up the skulls by size and say my gosh... thats how dogs evolved... first they were small ratlike... and then they got bigger and bigger. Thats basically how the evolution of man came to be. You have different kinds of ape skulls, line them up by size and viola... evolution.
Click to expand...

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=162390.80;topicseen
 
Rolfe said:
A small pansy, or an over-sized violin? :confused:

Rolfe.
Click to expand...

spit.gif
I missed that. Sweet! Twofer!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom