Czarcasm
Groovy Groovy Guru
Sorry, duplicate post.
Last edited:
Why should JREF waste their time and ours trying to answer anonymous gossip when there are authentic challenges and protocols to sort through? Of course, if you could be bothered to actually name the source of this rumor(which you could of course do before JREF says another word)....if such a source actually existed.
To state the obvious: [email protected]
JREF staff. As my post indicated, they are out of the loop and you'll need to contact Mr. Randi if you want to know more.Or you could tell us who told you.
if such a source actually existed
All hail he who makes JREF jump at a moment's notice, the great and powerful Ray T.!!Czarcasm:
On the 6th of October some guy Ray posts the OP of this thread in the JREF forum referencing a SWIFT article.
On the 7th of October a correction appears in a SWIFT article on the exact same subject matter, which was authored 7 months prior to this date.
This presents us with two possibilities:
1. The events are related
2. The events are unrelated
3. The events are neither related nor unrelated
Tactfully ignoring the scary third option which would throw our entire frame of thought into question (zen monks reading this, please stop laughing, this aint funny around here), we conclude that the events are either related or not.
If they are related, then it appears that Ray may, after all, not pulling all this out of his rear end, and is apparently a competent clairvoyant (and half-way through completing his application for the MDC)
If they are unrelated, that was quite a bit of a concidence.
If I didn't know you better I would have thought you were being sarcasticAll hail he who makes JREF jump at a moment's notice, the great and powerful Ray T.!!
But you we so nice and cooperative when you started this thread-you even posted a smiley face! But now we know the only "agenda" here, to cast accusations without valid evidence in an attempt to smear JREF, is yours.If I didn't know you better I would have thought you were being sarcastic
Of course I don't think the JREF would have cared much about what I would have to say whether valid or not. In fact I don't think that the JREF would care much about anything outside its own agenda, but that is a personal opinion and you wouldn't care about it, as I clearly would not care whether you want to know my source or not.
Czarcasm;4110289..........the only "agenda" here said:I think there's a bit of an exaggeration here. Asking whether some information is valid or not is not an accusation. He put some information on the table (that he obviously heard from somewhere) and expects for a confirmation or disproof.
......as we all do....
(that he obviously heard from somewhere)
Czarcasm:
On the 6th of October some guy Ray posts the OP of this thread in the JREF forum referencing a SWIFT article.
On the 7th of October a correction appears in a SWIFT article on the exact same subject matter, which was authored 7 months prior to this date.
This presents us with two possibilities:
1. The events are related
2. The events are unrelated
3. The events are neither related nor unrelated
Tactfully ignoring the scary third option which would throw our entire frame of thought into question (zen monks reading this, please stop laughing, this aint funny around here), we conclude that the events are either related or not.
If they are related, then it appears that Ray may, after all, not pulling all this out of his rear end, and is apparently a competent clairvoyant (and half-way through completing his application for the MDC)
If they are unrelated, that was quite a bit of a concidence.