• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

MaGZ's theory on 9/11

The WTC 7 evacuation started within a few minutes of the second airplane hitting WTC 2. The only questions remaining about that was whether OEM evacuated at that time or later. The 9/11 CR put it at about 9:30 or so and NIST put it at about 9:45 or so but one or two OEM employees said it was at the same time as everyone else in the building.

(the reports have a more exact timeline on it but I'm feeling too lazy to dig it up right now).


The OEM was evacuated before the second plane hit. They knew another plane was heading in to hit a building so they got out when they could. This is why Jennings and Hess found the OEM evacuated with hot coffee still on the tables when they arrived.
 
fair enough. Those seem to be fairly well sourced as well. Not sure how it ties in with the rest of the theory though.

I haven't looked at the second link, but I'm very familiar with the first. The sources have the usual truther problem of supporting the statements made only if you take little bits of it out of context. Read in their entirety, they actually contradict much of what is claimed.

Apparently, truthers don't have the attention span to read things in their entirety.
 
The OEM was evacuated before the second plane hit. They knew another plane was heading in to hit a building so they got out when they could. This is why Jennings and Hess found the OEM evacuated with hot coffee still on the tables when they arrived.

This is consistent with your hypothesis, but having facts that are consistent with a hypothesis does not make it true. For instance, I have a theory that the moon is connected to the Earth with a giant, invisible, elastic string. The fact that the moon hangs around close to the Earth is consistent with my theory, but it doesn't make it true.
 
You have no idea how fast these AtoA missile travel do you?

Try filming something at Mach 2.5. The warheard is too small to do what you say and it would not have hit a building, thats now how they work.

Plus, what is eyewitness testimony about an object moving at that speed really worth, anyway? By the time they notice it, it's already hit it's target. It would be moving too fast for them to hear it approaching and too fast for them to track it with their eyes, unless they are following it from miles out.

Perhaps MaGZ has been watching too many movies?
 
The OEM was evacuated before the second plane hit. They knew another plane was heading in to hit a building so they got out when they could. This is why Jennings and Hess found the OEM evacuated with hot coffee still on the tables when they arrived.

The official order to evacuate the whole building came after the second plane hit. See Mike Catalano's testimony. There were no dead bodies in the lobby. There was no fire caused by a missile.

There was no missile.
 
The official order to evacuate the whole building came after the second plane hit. See Mike Catalano's testimony. There were no dead bodies in the lobby. There was no fire caused by a missile.

There was no missile.

No conspiracy. No thermite. No missiles. No ray beams. No remote control aircraft. No vicsims. No pods. No flyovers. KSM has confirmed this. KSM will confirm this again during his trial. The evidence that will be produced at KSM's trial, that shows the attacks where carried out by 19 terrorists who hyjacked planes, will confirm this. KSM divulged this evidence and will agree with it infront of the world by pleading guilty to his part in planning it. KSM will tell us how and why. End game.
 
I haven't looked at the second link, but I'm very familiar with the first. The sources have the usual truther problem of supporting the statements made only if you take little bits of it out of context. Read in their entirety, they actually contradict much of what is claimed.

Apparently, truthers don't have the attention span to read things in their entirety.

Nor do they believe a terrorist who admits that he planned it and got some of his neighbours to actually carry that successful plan out. KSM will repeat this very soon and in full view of the world - no waterboarding required.
 
My theory on 9/11:

AQ did it.

The Mossad was operating in the US under the guise of Israeli Art Students watching the hijackers at the request of US intelligence agencies. The Mossad reported back to the Americans but did not relay any information they learned indicating a coming attack. The US was caught by surprise on 9/11 because Israel did to tell what they knew.

KSM ran the operation in the US, and meet groups of hijackers in Las Vegas on several occasions.

The plan on 9/11 by AQ was to takeout the Twin Towers, the Pentagon, the White House and/or Congress and the assassination of President Bush in Florida. Other planes were part of the attack but were grounded. These would-be hijackers ran from the grounded planes.

The planned Bush assassination plot that morning was similar to the assassination of Ahmad Shah Massoud in northern Afghanistan two days earlier with the use of a exploding camera. The explosives in the camera was prepared days earlier by Atta using a "Mother of Satan" explosive mixture.

There was no military stand-down. One passenger plane was almost shot-down over Ground Zero (one missile hitting WTC 7 and another flying into the Hudson River). The hijacked plane over Pennsylvania was downed by an American fighter.

WTC 7 was a controlled demolition to prevent the building from toppling over into the search and rescue area.

The anthrax attacks that followed over the next few weeks was a Mossad operation that was initially planned as early as 1998 but was moved up as a follow-on to the 9/11 attacks. The anthrax attacks were designed by Israel to get the US to attack and invade Iraq. The anthrax came from their bio-weapons lab in Nes Ziona.

I suppose you also believe the recent Hudson crash landing was a staged crash to cover up some kind of recovery operation for the missile? Do you have any evidence of this missle hitting the Hudson? Any witness evidence? Any evidence at all?
 
My theory on 9/11:

AQ did it.

The Mossad was operating in the US under the guise of Israeli Art Students watching the hijackers at the request of US intelligence agencies. The Mossad reported back to the Americans but did not relay any information they learned indicating a coming attack. The US was caught by surprise on 9/11 because Israel did to tell what they knew.

KSM ran the operation in the US, and meet groups of hijackers in Las Vegas on several occasions.

The plan on 9/11 by AQ was to takeout the Twin Towers, the Pentagon, the White House and/or Congress and the assassination of President Bush in Florida. Other planes were part of the attack but were grounded. These would-be hijackers ran from the grounded planes.

The planned Bush assassination plot that morning was similar to the assassination of Ahmad Shah Massoud in northern Afghanistan two days earlier with the use of a exploding camera. The explosives in the camera was prepared days earlier by Atta using a "Mother of Satan" explosive mixture.

There was no military stand-down. One passenger plane was almost shot-down over Ground Zero (one missile hitting WTC 7 and another flying into the Hudson River). The hijacked plane over Pennsylvania was downed by an American fighter.

WTC 7 was a controlled demolition to prevent the building from toppling over into the search and rescue area.

The anthrax attacks that followed over the next few weeks was a Mossad operation that was initially planned as early as 1998 but was moved up as a follow-on to the 9/11 attacks. The anthrax attacks were designed by Israel to get the US to attack and invade Iraq. The anthrax came from their bio-weapons lab in Nes Ziona.

And don't forget the Israeli's warned the employees of Odigo even while they were on their way to work by using their Jewpiter Jack communication device. You may as well throw that in there MsGZ while your hating Jews and everything.
 
I get the feeling that if 9/11 was really caused by missiles -- if everybody saw cruise missiles hitting the towers -- 9/11 investigator would claim it really was passenger jets, and that it is all the Jews' fault.
 
I’m reviving this thread since a few individuals have asked me if my beliefs on what happened on 9/11 have changed.

I still stand on my opening statement.
 
The US was caught by surprise on 9/11 because Israel did to tell what they knew.

What on earth makes you think the U.S. government was caught by surprise on 9/11? What makes you think the U.S. government was dependent on Israeli spies working within the United States for information? What makes you think the U.S. government wasn't aware of what was coming and actually desired it?
 
I’m reviving this thread since a few individuals have asked me if my beliefs on what happened on 9/11 have changed.

I still stand on my opening statement.

While you remain mired in these beliefs, what was the reason building 7 had to be destroyed?
 
Nah!!!

Rule_1: Never read back more than two posts.

;)

HOWEVER if "WTC 7 was a controlled demolition to prevent the building from toppling over into the search and rescue area."

A) It would be a world record for plan and implement a CD;
B) There would be no need for secrecy;
C) Add
D) ...more to suit personal
E) ...taste
 
Last edited:
The OEM was evacuated before the second plane hit. They knew another plane was heading in to hit a building so they got out when they could. This is why Jennings and Hess found the OEM evacuated with hot coffee still on the tables when they arrived.

Need I point out that no matter at what haste the OEM was evacuated, walking down the hall with hot coffee would not be at the forefront of anyone's to do list.
Was said coffee in open cups or in take-away paper cups with lids?
If you were told to evacuate your office, in situation in which an office building accross the street is burning, be sure to take your Starbucks coffee with you or would your first concern be to get out?

J&H found hot coffee on the tables simply becuase the OEM had been evacuated. You cannot ascribe anything further to that fact. To attempt to do so betrays that you're grasping at straws.
 
You could at least have read the opening statement:

I read that he posted that, but my reason for asking MaGZ is to determine if he really knows what area WTC7 collapsed into.
 
Last edited:

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom