Lucianarchy and remote viewing

[juninho]

I didn't say the police knew there was a bus with a bomb on it two hours before. I said the police may have known there was a threat to Ladybrook in general.

Not only that, but he has stated on another thread that he worked for the home office. In what capacity we'll never know as he seemed incapable of answering the question. It could well be that he worked with some special intelligence unit (the delicious irony if it were true) and had information regarding the security situation in that area.

Personally, I think he cheated. The word appears 'added' on at the end and why just write the one word. Surely you would say something like "look out for ladybrook". I'll tell you why not because people might have paid more attention to it at the (debated) time of the original posting.

Has he ever slipped in a word before in any of his posts? Seems very suspicious to do it for the first time on a thread entitled "Lucianarchy and remote viewing".

 

[Ersby]

I had a look round re Lucian's propensity for dropping in single words, and though he is known for his pointless tangents, I couldn't find any.

Anyway, if there are any people reading who did look at this thread before c0rbin posted and don't want to admit it (understandable, considering you'd be supporting someone like Lucian) could you at least PM me. Just to satisfy my own personal curiosity, you understand. Thanks.

 

[davidhorman]

I'll tell you why not because people might have paid more attention to it at the (debated) time of the original posting.

Ah, didn't you know? If people pay attention to things like remote viewing they stop working. That's why Luci wouldn't agree to a test of his lottery powers, because even a PGP encrypted prediction would disrupt the ether or something. And, err, that's why quantum mechanics means psychics are real, yeah.

David

 

[Lucianarchy]

Of course, renata has demonstrated how such results can be gained by chance, which is another compelling argument.

Ersby, "such results" like Renata's are not even remotely ( no pun intended) compelling.

Ladybrook is a far more uncommon term than anything she put up, and a bus hijacked by terrorists and packed with explosives, is, I suggest a tad more important than someone smelling smoke or a grass fire?

 

[Lucianarchy]

The original assumption was that the forum clock was 20 minutes slow

David, you swing back and forth faster than a metronome on speed. It appears a few desperate people are trying to spin all sorts of tall tales about the clock , but it was your claim I was debunking.

 

[thaiboxerken]

Ladybrook is a far more uncommon term than anything she put up, and a bus hijacked by terrorists and packed with explosives, is, I suggest a tad more important than someone smelling smoke or a grass fire?

LOL. The "importance" of your coincidence is not evidence that you have superpowers.

Now, someone said something about lottery numbers.

Predict us some lottery numbers.

 

[Lucianarchy]

Alien X,

First off, I have been 'tested', perhaps you missed my earlier post regarding work for the Koestler Inst. You also need to know a bit more about RV, I suggest you go look up some of the links Dr Grenard has provided before you spout any more of your silly home-made tests. I find it hilarious that with all the charges of dishonesty, cheating etc levelled at me, you, in return, expect me to take forums members honesty at face value. BTW, how you expect me to take someone who quotes a childrens cartoon in their sig seriously, I don't know, but, I can assure, I do not.

Judging by the lengths of your rants and your immature attitude, it seems that you came here and saw something you didn't like, sorry about that, but it's not my problem.

 

[thaiboxerken]

First off, I have been 'tested'

By quacks!



Shut up, Lucky, you don't have superpowers.

Prove me wrong by winning the JREF million.

 

[thaiboxerken]

BTW, how you expect me to take someone who quotes a childrens cartoon in their sig seriously, I don't know, but, I can assure, I do not.

I hope you aren't a parent. A responsible parent wouldn't mistake South Park for being a children's cartoon.

 

[Starrman]

First off, I have been 'tested', perhaps you missed my earlier post regarding work for the Koestler Inst. You also need to know a bit more about RV, I suggest you go look up some of the links Dr Grenard has provided before you spout any more of your silly home-made tests. I find it hilarious that with all the charges of dishonesty, cheating etc levelled at me, you, in return, expect me to take forums members honesty at face value.

You mean Dr. Grenard's link to the article about the double blind test where they told the remote viewer what the target was? Yes, those were compelling.

As to your testing, the key to scientific testing is repeatability, so one test by one person simply doesn't cut it. In order for us to take the Koestler test of you seriously, you have to have to have his findings of your abilities verified by an independent tester.

 

[Ossai]

Lucianarchy

I have been accused of using police scanners, using unknown editing techniques, criminal involvement and been told the clock was GMT and should be an hour different. All these suppositions have been shown to clearly false.

No, you have claimed that they are false. No evidence was presented (baring the time stamp) the others are still open.

"such results" like Renata's are not even remotely ( no pun intended) compelling

What makes her results different than yours?

Ossai

 

[davidhorman]

but it was your claim I was debunking.

Which claim exactly? That the forum clock is unreliable? That when it says GMT, it's actually showing something closer to BST, and is therefore incorrect?

As I've shown, either way you look at it corbin's post most likely occurred later than the timestamp (even if you pretend it's BST) indicates.

David

 

[CFLarsen]

....I suggest you go look up some of the links Dr Grenard has provided before you spout any more of your silly home-made tests.

Who are you talking about here? Steve Grenard? He is not a doctor.

He's a clinical coordinator and administrative supervisor.

Get your facts straight, Lucianarchy.

 

[thaiboxerken]

Who are you talking about here? Steve Grenard? He is not a doctor.

He's a clinical coordinator and administrative supervisor.

Get your facts straight, Lucianarchy.

I hope he doesn't try to get the quackery introduced into the clinic.

 

[Lucianarchy]

As to your testing, the key to scientific testing is repeatability, so one test by one person simply doesn't cut it. In order for us to take the Koestler test of you seriously, you have to have to have his findings of your abilities verified by an independent tester.

"His"? I can assure you that I am not trying to impress the "us" you refer to If you want to dismiss the 'ladybrook' perception as (insert your own belief here) then it's no skin off my nose. I'm just telling it like it is, you can embellish it with police scanners and secret editing techniques till the cows come home, it makes no difference to what really happened as I know you really think that my perception was genuine, as does tbk, your behaviour and hysteria is a dead give-away.

 

[Starrman]

I suggest you go look up some of the links Dr Grenard ...

I assume that this was a simple mistake - since you hold honesty in such high regard.

 

[CFLarsen]

it makes no difference to what really happened.....

No, it didn't. You had ample time to edit your post.

...as I know you really think that my perception was genuine, as does tbk, your behaviour and hysteria is a dead give-away.

What I find extremely interesting is you ignoring the evidence that it was perfectly possible for you to dump that word there.

In a thread about your proclaimed RV abilities? In a post, where you had ample time to edit it?

And we know that you lie, you cheat, you misrepresent?

Try again, this time a little harder, Lucianarchy.

 

[Starrman]

"His"? I can assure you that I am not trying to impress the "us" you refer to If you want to dismiss the 'ladybrook' perception as (insert your own belief here) then it's no skin off my nose. I'm just telling it like it is, you can embellish it with police scanners and secret editing techniques till the cows come home, it makes no difference to what really happened as I know you really think that my perception was genuine, as does tbk, your behaviour and hysteria is a dead give-away.

I was talking about the Koestler Institute tests, asking if they are repeatable and, if so, if they had been. I had mistakingly thought 'Koestler' was a single man, which is why I typed "his".

As I told you already, I only brought up police scanners as a possible alternate solution, and I never accused you of secret editing techniques (who is hysterical here?).

I actuall will concede that I believe that you typed the word 'ladybrook' based on an image in your head, and then something happened in ladybrook.

But I will say this again - this is not even that compelling of a coincendence! You have not demonstrated anything paranormal - you had an image that was likely to be in the news at some point after you typed it. By typing only a single word, any number of events could be shoe horned to fit your one-word 'perception'.

 

[c0rbin]

The time and clock issue is almost moot with Renata and Starrman's RV skillz showing strong.

Lucky is desperatly trying to see the demons in her basement.

 

[Ceinwyn]

Ersby, "such results" like Renata's are not even remotely ( no pun intended) compelling.

Ladybrook is a far more uncommon term than anything she put up, and a bus hijacked by terrorists and packed with explosives, is, I suggest a tad more important than someone smelling smoke or a grass fire?

Except, Luci, you NEVER posted anything to do with a bus, or terrorists, or a hijacking. You simply typed one word, which could have meant ANYTHING.

If something else had happened there, say an 18-wheeler hitting a council house or a fire demolishing a community center, would you have said those were your predictions? Seems to me your claim has very much in common with Renata's.