Lucianarchy and remote viewing

[thaiboxerken]

With the forum clock being fast, I will have to go with what someone earlier has stated. Luci has the "unique" ability to convey news as it happens, in his local area. Wow, I'm impressed.

 

[Dogwood]

I have - of course! - taken the forum time stamp discrepancy into consideration.

Ah. Nevermind then.

So what's the complete timeline of events? Including the posts involved, adjusting for the time discrepencies, and the reported event (if some kind soul would like to convert everything into BST)?

 

[davidhorman]

Oops, I take back my last bit of Devil's Advocacy.

By forum time, Luci posted at 15:33GMT, but the content of that post could have been edited (assuming no-one read the thread) any time up until corbin's reply at 16:35GMT (forum time).

The forum is 40 minutes fast, so that's actually 15:55GMT, or 16:55BST, 25 minutes after the earliest reported time of any of the events in Ladybrook.

But look on the bright side, Luci has most of the rest of the week to predict the lottery numbers.

Edited to add: If only I could prove I didn't read your post before I wrote that Mark, I could claim psychic powers

David

 

[renata]

Forum fast or slow?

According to my information, the forum is SLOW, not fast. It is now 2:58 PM PST.

The forum clock is 2:41 PM PST.

Also, I believe one can edit with no time stamp only a short while ( 2 minutes?) after the initial post is made.


( Edited to add-You would think all you engineers and computer scientists would have figured it out. Let me guess- you show up twp hours early or two hours late when Daylight Savings Time kicks in)

Edited again- see, no time stamp, because I was within 2 min-even though Clancie posted after me.

2:46 forum time edit test- aha! got the time stamp. So it is less than 5 minutes and more than 2 to get the stamp.

Edited to say- Now that I think about it, although my preferences are set for PST, (8 hours off GMT), perhaps it does not account for Daylight Savings time, and the forum IS 40 minutes fast and not 20 minutes slow, and I was being all snooty for no good reason.

 

[Clancie]

Of course, David Copperfield recently accurately gave all six winning numbers in the German lottery in advance (or so it seems).

If he said he was remote viewing, would anyone believe him?

 

[davidhorman]

Of course, David Copperfield recently accurately gave all six winning numbers in the German lottery in advance (or so it seems).

How far in advance? Was it live on stage or live on TV? Or was it like Luci, and he just said he did but he couldn't prove it and everyone should just believe him?

I can't speak for PST, but the forum stamped this message at 22:46GMT. That's 23:46BST, but it's actually only 23:04BST - that's 40 minutes fast.

David

 

[CFLarsen]

Of course, David Copperfield recently accurately gave all six winning numbers in the German lottery in advance (or so it seems).

If he said he was remote viewing, would anyone believe him?

No, and that's exactly the point: Copperfield does not claim to have paranormal powers (outside his showmanship, which really is amazing). John Edward does claim to have paranormal powers.

 

[EdipisReks]

Re: Re: Re: Lucianarchy

Makes me feel better that these IRVA people are associated with the Edgar Cayce foundation. His "remote viewing" of Atlantis and his prediction it would rise were oh so accurate.

well, everyone who doubted him is gonna be awfully miffed when R'yleh rises and Cthulhu eats everyone.

 

[Dogwood]

I think the only thing that can be said with any certainty at this point is that some of us have our time set incorrectly.

 

[Jeff Corey]

It could be that the "edited by___ at ____" only comes up if someone posts a reply before you edit your post, rather than having some arbitrary time limit.
Sometimes when the board is inactive, I've edited some silly post of mine a couple of times in a 20 minute period without that message coming up at the bottom.
Now it would be astounding if Luci figured that out and pulled a fast one
Edit to test.
Edit to test 2.
Edit to test 3.
t4
t6
t7
Well, that falsified the original idea. My first post was at 11:34, and the first "Edited by" came after the last test at 11:40.

 

[Lucianarchy]

With the forum clock being fast, I will have to go with what someone earlier has stated. Luci has the "unique" ability to convey news as it happens, in his local area. Wow, I'm impressed.

lol. Do you know where Belfast is?

Even with all your supposed slow jref clocks and supposed undetected editing how was I supposed to intercept police messages and get them to the forum even before the event took place and even before the terrorists parked the bus rigged with explosives outside the police station!!??

 

[TLN]

lol. Do you know where Belfast is?

Even with all your supposed slow jref clocks and supposed undetected editing how was I supposed to intercept police messages and get them to the forum even before the event took place and even before the terrorists parked the bus rigged with explosives outside the police station!!??

Let's see...

Because you have a history of lying?

 

[renata]

lol. Do you know where Belfast is?

Even with all your supposed slow jref clocks and supposed undetected editing how was I supposed to intercept police messages and get them to the forum even before the event took place and even before the terrorists parked the bus rigged with explosives outside the police station!!??

Well, maybe there is something to it. Let me test my RV powers.
New York
Trenton
Van Nuys
Houston

 

[thaiboxerken]

Even with all your supposed slow jref clocks and supposed undetected editing how was I supposed to intercept police messages and get them to the forum even before the event took place and even before the terrorists parked the bus rigged with explosives outside the police station!!??

1. You did not make any prediction at all.

2. We don't know that you didn't cheat, but it's highly possible.

3. Ladybrooke estate seems to be a place that has occured in BBC news a few times.

4. People don't have superpowers.

5. The JREF clock is questionable, meaning that you could very well have placed that word in your post after learning of the news.

6. You have zero credibility.



You have all 6 of these reasons working against your claim, Luci.

 

[Lucianarchy]

Something stinks here, that's for sure...

Yes, it's your fetid cynicism.

 

[CFLarsen]

Yes, it's your fetid cynicism.

Strange that you do not address my points at all.

 

[thaiboxerken]

Maybe Luci's remote viewing skills involve a remote-control and cable TV.

 

[Pyrrho]

Of course, David Copperfield recently accurately gave all six winning numbers in the German lottery in advance (or so it seems).

If he said he was remote viewing, would anyone believe him?

No, because what he did is a very old magician's trick, and because Copperfield is a professional magician who has not claimed supernatural powers. Now, I suspect that if someone who is not a professional magician claimed supernatural powers and performed the same trick, there are numerous people who would believe the non-magician was remote viewing. There would be skeptics, certainly, but I think enough people want to believe, that a certain number would believe.

 

[TLN]

Strange that you do not address my points at all.

What's strange about that? Typical Luci I'd say...

 

[Lucianarchy]

We don't know that you didn't cheat, but it's highly possible.

If it's "highly" possible, then go ahead and "cheat". You've been shown that you can't edit your posts over that sort of time span and not get it recorded. But don't let that stop you. Go on. Do it.

You can't.

Your so called explanations are completely bogus, weak, lame and, frankly, stupid. I have demonstrated what you asked for, and it is here for all to see. I thought that's what you wanted.