Loss Leader's Super Simple Telepathy Test

Thank you for your reply. Then, I answer "I don't know".


That's a pretty strange answer from the only person here who claims any sort of telepathic ability. Well, if you don't guess, I imagine you can't be wrong.


I forgot to mention a time-frame for the test. While I think this would be fatal for a scientific experiment, I hope it will be sufficient for this preliminary proceeding. It is 3:07 p.m. eastern now. Guesses will be accepted if time-stamped on or before 12:00 p.m. eastern tomorrow, Saturday. Any guesses made after that time (or any post edited after that time in any way) will be disregarded.

Thanks.
 
I forgot to mention a time-frame for the test. While I think this would be fatal for a scientific experiment, I hope it will be sufficient for this preliminary proceeding. It is 3:07 p.m. eastern now. Guesses will be accepted if time-stamped on or before 12:00 p.m. eastern tomorrow, Saturday. Any guesses made after that time (or any post edited after that time in any way) will be disregarded.

Grumble/
Do you have any idea how hard it is to set up 300,000 socks on this forum!
/Grumble
 
I'm sensing the number includes the digit 8, or is it 9? Over here, perhaps. A father figure? 7? I know its a 5 -- it is coming through very strongly. A birthday? Did you have a dog that died at age 2 or 3?

I'm right, aren't I?

It won't be long before the entire 6 digits are clear to me, but I need to start with just 1.
 
482873

I'm not going to guess three numbers because that seems like cheating, but I'll give my computer's entropy pool a stab at it:

820934
 
Potato!

Send me my money in a brown paper bag, small denominations only, and I want Tuesday Weld's phone number.
 
By the way you should not have put a single number with a MD5 hash. I have no lust to try it (sleepy sleep), but calculating a MD5 hash is not complicated I have a routine somewhere for that. I wonder if I could run it up and try to find your hash.

ETA; just for kicker I will try tomorrow morning and see how long the program takes to get that number correctly. A way to avoid such cheating would have been to take 3 time a 6 digits number for example, it is trivially easy for you to add numbers, but exponentially harder for us to brute force. If you need T time, 2 number brute force would be T^2,3 would be T^3 etc (baring spreading the calculation over many units)...
 
Last edited:
By the way you should not have put a single number with a MD5 hash. I have no lust to try it (sleepy sleep), but calculating a MD5 hash is not complicated I have a routine somewhere for that. I wonder if I could run it up and try to find your hash.

ETA; just for kicker I will try tomorrow morning and see how long the program takes to get that number correctly. A way to avoid such cheating would have been to take 3 time a 6 digits number for example, it is trivially easy for you to add numbers, but exponentially harder for us to brute force. If you need T time, 2 number brute force would be T^2,3 would be T^3 etc (baring spreading the calculation over many units)...


The MD hash is a semi-random phrase with the number contained somewhere in it. I thought that provided reasonable protection against brute force. I tried the hash through several decrypters and none of them even had a guess, let alone a correct one.
 
The MD hash is a semi-random phrase with the number contained somewhere in it. I thought that provided reasonable protection against brute force. I tried the hash through several decrypters and none of them even had a guess, let alone a correct one.

Yeah I realized that after exausting the domain and reread the OP

"I next encoded that number into a simple phrase (the top couple words on a document next to me)"

I would like to chalk it on being tired and it is midnight but the reality is probably I read the op not carefuly.
 
424242

The number of the Multiverse

666666

The number of the multiverse beast

666555

Walmart Discount Multiverse Beast.

Norm
 

Back
Top Bottom