So you keep saying, but just saying it over and over again doesn't make it any more true. Your contention that modern technology makes it possible for any young man in the world to gain a prestigious college degree over the internet is cruelly blind to the state of the world today.
It's childish, if not downright mad. On a foundation of such obvious silliness, you cannot build anything but more silliness.
It is in case of negative social harmony and justice realization when society begins to let down elite to ordinary people level.And I might point out again, that if everybody is "elite," nobody is elite.
It will be so – everybody will be special, changeable, exclusive, high educated, multi professional elite class person.It's the same as saying everybody is special.
The real great values have unlimitedly huge price – so they have to be for free and for everybody.If everybody on earth could get a degree from the Sorbonne over the internet then for purposes of employment and preferment, a degree from the Sorbonne would not be worth its weight in toilet paper
and other tests and hurdles would be found to determine who in society is "elite."
To create job places in today’s high productive companies we need 24 hours working week.Sarkozy says the 35-hour law was an economic mistake that did not create jobs as it was intended to do, but he has promised not to abolish it outright.
Because he and you can’t understand the difference in quality of different sort of free from job time: evening after workday, weekend two days and 3 days in France and some weeks of vacation.Why do I find the complaints of a 27 year-old unconvincing?
NOT A HUMAN BEING FOR TODAY’S ORDINARY LIFESTYLE BUT NEW SHABATON’S LIFESTYLE FOR A HUMAN BEING !What about for all the women?
the internet cafe at the end of the universe....
And you will speak HRL even cleverer than now.They'll be included following the arrival of Porcine Airlines' Flight 42 from Tel Aviv
The only way you are going to get anywhere (ok, there is no way you're getting anywhere, but I'm being generous) is if you somehow convince the government of your country to adopt your "system" and it is a success. Ranting incoherent babble in random forums will get you nowhere. I can't adopt your system as my employer would fire me faster than I can blink. They have invested thousands of dollars in me, not including salary, and they'd rather I not spend half my time scratching my balls.Most of you lived in so called high-developed democratic countries.
It means that for all your life the gradient of freedom around you was near zero level.
I lived till the age of 40 in totalitarian communist USSR and than in Israel.
I have a strong experience to live for the last 20 years in personal social environment with positive gradient of freedom.
I urge all people to live in social environment with constant positive gradient of freedom.
I have a strong feeling when gradient of social freedom becomes zero and then negative, and you have not this sort of feeling.
Believe me that from 1999 the General World gradient of freedom became zero and than, after September 11 2001 has become negative.
Only New Shabaton Total Global ideology can make General World Gradient of freedom and every world citizen’s gradient of freedom POZITIVE FOR EVER.
They have invested thousands of dollars in me, not including salary, and they'd rather I not spend half my time scratching my balls.
In my society every person will invest only his money to himself developing according his personal choice and “second currency” – 26 weeks a year of his creative vacation.
N. Catherine d’Erlette
Department of Sociology, University of Michigan
1. Consensuses of defining characteristic
“Class is used in the service of class divisions,” says Baudrillard; however, according to Tilton[1] , it is not so much class that is used in the service of class divisions, but rather the futility, and subsequent stasis, of class.
The example of dialectic postcultural theory intrinsic to Joyce’s Ulysses emerges again in Dubliners. However, the premise of nationalism suggests that academe is part of the absurdity of reality, given that Derrida’s analysis of dialectic postcultural theory is valid.
-----------
1. Tilton, F. O. U. ed. (1981) Dialectic submaterial theory in the works of Joyce. University of Illinois Press
Source
Not just Derrida, but Derrida on Joyce! The Mornington Crescent of bogosity. You've trumped us all. All hail the new International Cosmopolitan!
That essay is nothing if not comprehensive in its sourcesI was going to try to trump you with Lacan, but checked the source - damn and double damn you, sir: it's already there!
In my society every person will invest only his money to himself developing according his personal choice and “second currency” – 26 weeks a year of his creative vacation.
You've trumped us all. All hail the new International Cosmopolitan!
I would like to definite national, cosmopolitan and international on individual level of every person and on the level of society.
Ten years from now, how many people do you expect (not hope) to be living in this fantastic/hallucinatory world of yours?My world will be the world of national, international with different common languages and cultures and cosmopolitan with different common languages states and cities.
Every world person will have right to live and work in all of them of course.
Holy Resurrected Israel will be national – international – cosmopolitan World Capital State with HRL natively speaking multilingual citizens, that believes in GOD.
We're up to the eyeballs just reading it.If NC's plan worked then in no time at all we'd be up to our ankles in sewer water and garbage.
You'll see what wollery means when you enter the praising jehovah whilst standing on your head 26-week periodWe're up to the eyeballs just reading it.If NC's plan worked then in no time at all we'd be up to our ankles in sewer water and garbage.
I have designed my global world for all worldwide people, but in the first step of realization only high-developed democratic countries’ citizens will live in it.Ten years from now, how many people do you expect (not hope) to be living in this fantastic/hallucinatory world of yours?
Truly and only multicultural aristocratic elite multicultural 7th billions citizens world.Of course, the real problem with NC's plan is what would happen if it worked.
Please don’t use “or” from your world of alternatively.I.f every single person on the planet could train to do any job they wanted in 6 months, then everyone would be a pilot, or a brain surgeon, of an astronomer, or an artist, or a robotics engineer, and that's all wonderful and great.
.
But who would sweep the roads, or collect the garbage, or maintain the sewers?
If NC's plan worked then in no time at all we'd be up to our ankles in sewer water and garbage.
It is because all you adapted well to negative harmony achieving of justice and equality and I tell you about positive harmony of totally elite world achieving.We're up to the eyeballs just reading it.
One working week a year in this area equally distributed on every world citizen will solve this problem together with robots wide using.Originally Posted by bruto
Originally Posted by wollery
If NC's plan worked then in no time at all we'd be up to our ankles in sewer water and garbage.
We're up to the eyeballs just reading it.
You'll see what wollery means when you enter the praising jehovah whilst standing on your head 26-week period
Wrong answerI have designed my global world for all worldwide people, but in the first step of realization only high-developed democratic countries’ citizens will live in it.Ten years from now, how many people do you expect (not hope) to be living in this fantastic/hallucinatory world of yours?
Wrong answer
The question asked for a number (e.g. 1 or 42 or 10,000), not a rant
Please try to answer with a number
Thank you