• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Lord Language Resurrection.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Slavs are this part of Khazars that has converted in Christianity in the 9th century.
“Slave” means the “cross” from the Holy Language. - Christian cross.
No it doesn't. It means "word".
Turks are this part of Khazars that has converted in Islam in the 9th century. “Turks” from the word “Torah”.
This etymology is complete nonsense, as you have been informed several times. You have not forgotten. You are spouting "British Israelite" type religious rubbish derived from the notion that the Torah is the personal message of God, given to Moses in God's language, Hebrew.

This is intellectually equivalent to the Creationism spouted by imbecilic Bible-thumping Christian fundamentalists. Your nonsense is simply a Jewish version of that kind of idiocy.
 
You can think all what you want but Torah is the only book that so much people of most nations read for 3500 years.
Rubbish again. The Torah is much more recent than that.
The Torah is the result of a long process of editing (or redaction, as it is called by scholars). This means that there is no one date that one can be pointed to as the date of composition. Most scholars think that the final major redactions took place after 539 BCE, when Cyrus the Great conquered the Neo-Babylonian Empire.​
http://www.ancient.eu/Torah/

Also, people of "most nations" (that is, people living in the Roman and Persian Empires) became acquainted with it only many centuries later.

Here is the Torah being introduced to the Jews. This event was subsequent to the return from the Babylonian Exile.
Nehemiah 8:5 Ezra opened the book. All the people could see him because he was standing above them; and as he opened it, the people all stood up.6 Ezra praised the Lord, the great God; and all the people lifted their hands and responded, “Amen! Amen!” Then they bowed down and worshiped the Lord with their faces to the ground.
7 The Levites—Jeshua, Bani, Sherebiah, Jamin, Akkub, Shabbethai, Hodiah, Maaseiah, Kelita, Azariah, Jozabad, Hanan and Pelaiah—instructed the people in the Law while the people were standing there.8 They read from the Book of the Law of God, making it clear and giving the meaning so that the people understood what was being read.

9 Then Nehemiah the governor, Ezra the priest and teacher of the Law, and the Levites who were instructing the people said to them all, “This day is holy to the Lord your God. Do not mourn or weep.” For all the people had been weeping as they listened to the words of the Law.​
From this account it is absolutely manifest that the people of Judaea had never heard or read this Law before Ezra recited it to them. So the idea that "much people of most nations" had been reading it a thousand years before, is utterly ludicrous.
 
Those “Healthy humans” will become “ill people” in this case.

You don’t need salt.
You need sodium and potassium ions.
Many different food has them without salt that is very bad or health.

To use the word “Jadahit” from Tanah instead the word «Ivrit” – Hebrew is much more correct.

Wow. Don't you ever get tired from being wrong ? Silly me, I keep forgetting that you keep posting.

From chlorineWP:
In the form of chloride ions, chlorine is necessary to all known species of life.

Here's more: from https://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/002417.htm
Chloride is needed to keep the proper balance of body fluids. It is an essential part of digestive (stomach) juices.

Chloride, combined with potassium, is also found in many foods. It is most often the main ingredient in salt substitutes.
 
Is this really what you meant to say? That all food is harmful to all humans?
Of course. After all, nearly everyone who has died can be found to have eaten food at some time. ERGO!

A bunch of years from now (or at least I hope it's a big bunch) you'll stop and think: "damn, I shouldn't have had that burrito," but alas, it will be too late. Damn food sneaks up on you.
 
Doesn't matter. You are citing dogs as a dietary guide ignoring the fact that dogs will happily eat their own vomit. Are you suggesting that eating ones own vomit is a healthy thing simply because dogs do it?

Sent from my SM-A300FU using Tapatalk

Some people believe that to drink the own urine is good for health.
It is possible that to eat their own vomit is good for health, or at least not harmful.
Russian cosmonauts 50 years drink water that made from their own urine.
 
Some people believe that to drink the own urine is good for health.
It is possible that to eat their own vomit is good for health, or at least not harmful.
Russian cosmonauts 50 years drink water that made from their own urine.
Drnking urine, and drinking water distilled from urine, are very different things. Eating excrement, and eating vegetables fertilised with excrement, are different things.
 
If one of my team members tried to do that I would fire him.

It clear me that you are afraid of people of New Saturday that will refuse to work without 26 weeks of creative vacation a year and without the increasing of real hour wage 3% a year.
If your team does not hate you they are not creative slaves.
 
It clear me that you are afraid of people of New Saturday that will refuse to work without 26 weeks of creative vacation a year and without the increasing of real hour wage 3% a year.
If your team does not hate you they are not creative slaves.

There are no people of New Saturday. There's just you and there's nothing you can do to change that.
 
Last edited:
The phrase "sick as a dog" has meaning in part because, whether you want to believe it or not, a dog will eat indiscriminately, the wrong things and the wrong amounts. What a dog eats does not necessarily mean that it is lacking something in its diet that it should have. There are many obese and unhealthy dogs whose owners indulge their love of the wrong food, and many dogs that die, just as humans do, of ailments both preventable and not preventable.

It's true that some people seem to love their dogs more than they love other people, but those who truly love them will probably be feeding them carefully on dog food that is carefully formulated for them.

Of course you did not suggest that we, like dogs, eat cat poop, but you did suggest that we use the digestive capacity of dogs as a guide for what we can digest, and that is simply crazy.
Look.
I have no dogs, or cats because I just need not them.
When I want to eat new for me raw fish or raw meat I eat first not more than 50 grams.
After half an hour I eat 100 gr. more.
If I feel OK after an hour I eat 200 g. more.
And after 2-3 hours I eat 300 g more of raw fish or raw meat.

It was 2-3 times when I felt not good after the first 50 gr. of raw fish or raw meat.
In those cases I did not eat those raw meat and raw fish of course.
 
Look.
I have no dogs, or cats because I just need not them.
When I want to eat new for me raw fish or raw meat I eat first not more than 50 grams.
After half an hour I eat 100 gr. more.
If I feel OK after an hour I eat 200 g. more.
And after 2-3 hours I eat 300 g more of raw fish or raw meat.

It was 2-3 times when I felt not good after the first 50 gr. of raw fish or raw meat.
In those cases I did not eat those raw meat and raw fish of course.
You should cook it to make sure it is safe to eat.
Salmonella is one of the nasties you could get if you don't
You should also boil water if you strain it through a sock
 
This has been such a long thread for so long a time that I cannot remember which things I've mentioned before, but the suggestion in this case reminds me of an "intentional community" whose members I once met. Long long ago I worked for a community that ran on communal principles with some success (Camphill Village, USA, if anyone is interested - it's on the web I think nowadays), and we were occasionally visited be people from other such communities, and at one time we were visited by some people from the then new Twin Oaks community. That still exists as well, but no longer as it was founded, as a by-the-book embodiment of BF Skinner's Walden II. If you're familiar with that one, it's a work of fiction in which Skinner put forth some of his ideas on an ideal society, which to many would seem a gray mush of a clean but passionless order, in which the economy was managed according to the desirability of a job. The nastiest jobs were paid the highest, and hours the shortest. No coercion was involved, so basically one would choose an available job, do it, then sit back and let others do the rest. In actual practice, because the incentive was entirely economic rather than social, nobody could be made to do a job whose only attraction was its necessity. People who loved to teach or do clerical work would do it, despite poor pay, those with a crafting impulse worked in the industry that supported them (mostly hand woven hammocks, as I recall) and those who wanted to get it over with cleaned the toilets and scrubbed the pots, but the sheep got out because nobody could command "you need to fix the fence."

Anyway, Cosmo's plan reminds me of this utopian fever dream.
My aesthetic ideal about ensuring the freedom of creativity is Spinoza.
Many great and rich persons offered money and great place to stay with good libraries to work to Spinoza.
He categorically refused these offers and made money on his free creative living by grinding lenses.
I just figured out how to give to everyone the opportunity to earn the insuarence of 26 weeks a year of free creative life.
 
Did Walden have compulsory Hebrew lessons, meals consisting of fifteen pounds of unsalted uncooked buckwheat mash, and courts presided over by robot judges? No. So I would amend "utopian dream" to "dystopian nightmare" though I think the word "fever" can be left where you put it.

I don’t remember exactly.
May be it was you or somebody else from this great my topic that told me that to implement the project “Judge-robot” is principally impossible because it is principally impossible to make the program that will win Go from Go-champion.
But yesterday I heard that Google Go-player program has win Go from Go world champion.
So the same difficulty of program can be use successfully to make the judge-robot and to give first time in human beings history THE REAL EQUALITY OF ALL PEAOPLE BEFORE THE LAW!
Today we have just absolutely false equality of all citizens before the law in every developed and others countries.
 
I don’t remember exactly.
May be it was you or somebody else from this great my topic that told me that to implement the project “Judge-robot” is principally impossible because it is principally impossible to make the program that will win Go from Go-champion.
But yesterday I heard that Google Go-player program has win Go from Go world champion.
So the same difficulty of program can be use successfully to make the judge-robot and to give first time in human beings history THE REAL EQUALITY OF ALL PEAOPLE BEFORE THE LAW!
Today we have just absolutely false equality of all citizens before the law in every developed and others countries.
If you had an understanding of programming, you would understand the differences between winning a game and a "robot judge"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom