• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Lord Language Resurrection.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Strangely enough, some of us don't even get drunk on spirits every day.

Some of us don't even drink spirits.

I do like a beer now and then.

I don't drink spirits too because my organism produces alkaloids and opiates 6 days a week when I am free from eating.
 
I just realized this can be sung in the same tempo as the song 'Just the two of us' by Bill Withers. Also only you see it, only you.
Today only I see my Flying Temple in my project.
After it's implementation all people world wide will see it as minimum once a year.


Yes, The notion of blimps is possible, Blimps already exist and I point you to 'The Hindenburg' to see how it can go wrong.

To your second question Both.
My secret that all the world thinks that there is only one New Saturday Temple in the air.
In the situation of The Hindenburg my Flying Temple has ability to be resurrected for about an hour and to give to the people the feeling that they see the Resurrection of Dead.
 
Temporarily resurrecting dead temple zeppelins? That makes even less sense than most things you write, including rotten gauze as a water filter and a robotic judiciary.
 
Robot judges are not needed at all, let alone urgently.

Robot judges are NOT technically possible as all a robot can do is implement a yes/no protocol. As a result, a robot judge could not properly weigh conflicting evidence, determine truthfulness of witnesses, or interpret ambiguities in laws or legal arguments. The use of robots as judges would increase the amount of injustice in the world.

We don't need to mix those 2 questions.
Let us presume that to make good working in the most real cases robot judge is possible.
My question.
In this case society need to use robot judges as wide as possible or not?

About technical possibilities to create the robot judge I spoke with professor of mathematics that knows 5 program languages from the Soviet Union.
He said me for sure that today it is absolutely possible to build good working in the most cases robot judge.
I believe to this professor because I am mechanical engineer but not a programmist.
If you can to consult with specialists about possibilities to create a robot judges it will be interesting.
 
At this point I would not be surprised if Cosmo's idea of a robot judge is just some guy in a flimsy cardboard costume making 'Beep Boop' noises.

May be the same guy plays chess better than world championships and plays on New-York Stock Exchange in 95% of cases better than the high skilled professional brokers?
 
You propose me not to have cards with word "vodka" at all.
Only cards with words: whisky, brandy and gin?
I am not agree.
I want the domination of adjustable stochastic interesting events lifestyle.
And I know how to design it.

You may know how to design things. That does not mean what you design is any good, nor does it mean that you know how to get people to adopt your ideas.
 
No, that's a human judge.

Today you wait for court decisions over the years.
Most middle class people are in court processes most of their life.
It costs a lot of money and poisons all their life.
Judge - robots will give you high quality decisions for some minutes instead of bad quality today's decision after many years of stressful life.

Only with judge robots we will reach the real equality of citizens before the law.
 
Well, I guess you'd be the expert on ideas that will never be implemented. How's it coming getting any supporters?

What is your opinion about the ideas that will never implemented and will never dead?
Those sort of ideas can be much more valuable than ideas that were implemented and were dead after implementation.
 
Today you wait for court decisions over the years.

Most middle class people are in court processes most of their life.

It costs a lot of money and poisons all their life.

Judge - robots will give you high quality decisions for some minutes instead of bad quality today's decision after many years of stressful life.



Only with judge robots we will reach the real equality of citizens before the law.


Most of the delays in the modern judicial system are the result of the quantity of evidence that needs to be presented to provide enough information on which a decision can be made.

Consider divorce - what information is needed to equitably divide the marriage property? What about child custody? What about spousal support? How much of that information do you think is readily at the parties' fingertips? How much will they need to obtain?

How many of the decisions that need to be made require interaction with people to determine a just outcome?

Your robot judges can only implement yes/no protocols for various factors and as a result would lead to an increase in the amount of injustice in your society.
 
Today only I see my Flying Temple in my project.
After it's implementation all people world wide will see it as minimum once a year.



My secret that all the world thinks that there is only one New Saturday Temple in the air.
In the situation of The Hindenburg my Flying Temple has ability to be resurrected for about an hour and to give to the people the feeling that they see the Resurrection of Dead.

Bilmps cannot resurrect, I think what your trying to say is you'll just have another blimp up within an hour and seem to think people would be dumb enough to assume "Well that must be the same blimp, resurrection, huzzah".


May be the same guy plays chess better than world championships and plays on New-York Stock Exchange in 95% of cases better than the high skilled professional brokers?
....What? ....what?!.......anyway being good at chess as no bearing on playing the stock market.
 
Last edited:
To people like you even Reagan is "a psychopathic monster and his empire was a gross tyranny" because he was homophobic.
To people like me, "even Reagan" was a monster because of Iran-Contra. And twenty-five or thirty other things before we even get to homophobia.

Anyway, this thread is no fun anymore, because I was going to make a joke about Googling "butt vodka" and losing my job, but Cosmo basically just made the same joke himself. Although he was a lot more homophobic about it that I was going to be.
 
What is your opinion about the ideas that will never implemented and will never dead?
Those sort of ideas can be much more valuable than ideas that were implemented and were dead after implementation.

In your case it is a good and positive thing that your ideas will never be implemented. Your ideas are bad for people's health, would cripple economies and cause war on a scale not seen since World War II. I find it chilling that you'd cause that much damage for no better reason than your own ego. Perhaps the worst lie you tell is that you want to help people. Stepping over millions of corpses isn't exactly helping.
 
It is good that you understand how works the social chaos with adjustable probability of certain events.
Believe me you need not hundreds cards to organise the butiful life with stochastic events of adjustable probability because it is not a problem to make program instead of hundreds cards.
So let us suppose I decide to have something to eat. I say to myself: this is a stochastic event of adjustable probability, so I must let the programme on my i-pad decide what I should consume for dinner. I hope it will say, steak pie with mashed potato and peas!

Damn, it's telling me: three pounds of raw chicken and fifteen pounds of uncooked buckwheat mash without salt.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom