• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Lord Language Resurrection.

Status
Not open for further replies.
That sounds completely insane. If I went around with hundreds of cards shuffling and drawing them every time I wated to eat or drink something, or make any other decision, I would be sent to hospital for treatment of mental illness. And I don't think I'd ever be let out again.
 
Nationalcosmopolitan said:
The flying Temple is a spatial Shield of King David, who symbolically protects what's inside of the Temple from any direction.

Flying Temple is blue.
Flying Temple is red.
Flying Temple is in the sky.
From every point you see Magen David.
You see it. You and I. Inside New Saturday Flying Temple Tanah, Tripitaka, Bible and Koran.
Click to expand...

I just realized this can be sung in the same tempo as the song 'Just the two of us' by Bill Withers. Also only you see it, only you.

Nationalcosmopolitan said:
Thank you for your believing in technical reality of implementation of this idea.

You don't believe that robot Judges are urgently needful or you don't believe that their technical implementation are possible?
Click to expand...

Yes, The notion of blimps is possible, Blimps already exist and I point you to 'The Hindenburg' to see how it can go wrong.

To your second question Both.
 
Nationalcosmopolitan said:
You don't believe that robot Judges are urgently needful or you don't believe that their technical implementation are possible?
Click to expand...

Robot judges are not needed at all, let alone urgently.

Robot judges are NOT technically possible as all a robot can do is implement a yes/no protocol. As a result, a robot judge could not properly weigh conflicting evidence, determine truthfulness of witnesses, or interpret ambiguities in laws or legal arguments. The use of robots as judges would increase the amount of injustice in the world.
 
Border Reiver said:
Robot judges are not needed at all, let alone urgently.

Robot judges are NOT technically possible as all a robot can do is implement a yes/no protocol. As a result, a robot judge could not properly weigh conflicting evidence, determine truthfulness of witnesses, or interpret ambiguities in laws or legal arguments. The use of robots as judges would increase the amount of injustice in the world.
Click to expand...

At this point I would not be surprised if Cosmo's idea of a robot judge is just some guy in a flimsy cardboard costume making 'Beep Boop' noises.
 
Nationalcosmopolitan said:
Your proposal is a perfect example of the perversion of a Divine tool of lot (random sortition).

We live in the social world of probabilistic laws.

Health insurance, life, property; gambling, pensions, the system of ensuring quality of goods and services - all based on probabilistic laws.

We need to build the models of our lifestyle using those laws more and more clever.

For example.

Let us presume that you like to drink every day 100 gr. or vodka, or whisky, or brandy, or or a gin.

On the other hand you don't want to be a slave to the constant sequence of the days of drinking those drinks.

In this case you can write those drinks on five cards, shuffle them, and what drink drops out - this drink you drink in this day.

But you also do not want to be a slave of equal loving of those drinks.

So you don't want equal 20% of probabiity of each drink.

For example you want 17% of vodka, 33% of whisky, 21% of gin abd 2 29% of brandy.

It is your relative rating of how you realy like them.

So you write on 17 cards vodka, on 33 cards - whisky, on 21 cfrds - gin, on 29 cards - brandy.

Then you shuffle them, and each day pull one card.

You can easily make a computer program with adjustable probability of sampling any number of objects.

Not only drinks or dishes can be the objects of the random sortition with the adjustment of probability but lifestyles models for each day or each week or each month: meeting with friends, countries of travelling, subjects and professions of learning, places of working,etc.
Click to expand...


It always comes back to the vodka doesn't it.
 
Nay_Sayer said:
That....I....what? Your not even answering at this point just singing a mantra
Click to expand...
Because you try to make chaos by mixing different very important senses and ideas that I talked about in this thread.
Instead this type of trolling much more useful to combine the same senses without mixing in workable systems.
I know you think this, You've repeated yourself enough times to convince yourself but reality says otherwise.
Click to expand...
It I one of my intentions - to repeat myself not less and not more but "enough times" in every important sense and idea of this thread.



I have told you already why this will never be used but here it is again in all its futility; Judges, no matter how petty or straight forward the crime need to have empathy, They need to be able to sympathize. For example I'll share the story of how I was almost born in a car, My father was going 80+ to get to the hospital, They got pulled over and as soon as the cop asked why he was speeding he told him that my mothers water just broke. The cop immediately gave them an escort and later bought my mother a small teddy bear for me.

In your reality they would have been ticketed and possibly jailed. This is only one example and only one of at least a dozen other issues with robot judges.
Click to expand...

10 different and separated from each other judges will make 10 different decisions about one case in most cases.
10 different robot-judges will make one fast and very high quality decisions about one case.
If robot-judje can't make the decision it will say:"I can't make decision".
It will be in 5% of cases.
In those cases an ordinary judges will make decision.

robot-policeman will do the same as your policeman and it will buy the present to the baby of course too.
 
Craig4 said:
Who appointed you the judge of what ideas can and cannot be combined? If you have no means to restrict what ideas he can combine, how could he not be free to do so?
Click to expand...

Of course he has the freedom to combine all what he wants.
Just really stupid to design unimplementable combinations.
 
ComfySlippers said:
He has a robot judge and a magic iPhone that detects salmonella .
Best not to mess with him.

Oh, he has a paper hat also.

Be afraid.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I have only 12 messages that one can see on 12 pages.
6 pages on the front side and 6 pages on the back side.
12 tribes of Israel that were written on 12 stone tables from different stones.
6 tables on the front side and 6 tables on the back side.
It symbolises the combination of 12 great different senses (ideas) without mixing.
621

621
 
Last edited:
Nationalcosmopolitan said:
I have only 12 messages that one can see on 12 pages.

6 pages on the front side and 6 pages on the back side.

12 tribes of Israel that were written on 12 stone tables from different stones.

6 tables on the front side and 6 tables on the back side.

It symbolises the combination of 12 great different senses (ideas) without mixing.

[qimg]http://nationcosmopol.livejournal.com/photo/album/621/?mode=view&id=11507&page=1[/qimg]

[qimg]http://nationcosmopol.livejournal.com/photo/album/621/?mode=view&id=11182&page=1[/qimg]
Click to expand...


Ok.
Your anal alcohol wins.
 
Nationalcosmopolitan said:
Because you try to make chaos by mixing different very important senses and ideas that I talked about in this thread.
Instead this type of trolling much more useful to combine the same senses without mixing in workable systems.

It I one of my intentions - to repeat myself not less and not more but "enough times" in every important sense and idea of this thread.





10 different and separated from each other judges will make 10 different decisions about one case in most cases.
10 different robot-judges will make one fast and very high quality decisions about one case.
If robot-judje can't make the decision it will say:"I can't make decision".
It will be in 5% of cases.
In those cases an ordinary judges will make decision.

robot-policeman will do the same as your policeman and it will buy the present to the baby of course too.
Click to expand...

It isn't trolling to point out half your responses are you chanting your silly mantra..because that is exactly what you did.

Now you've thrown in Robot police which have even more issues than the robot judges would....I am at a total loss for what your trying to say in the highlited part.

I am this close to really sitting down and penning a novel about a super dystopian future using only elements from this thread.
 
Last edited:
Robo-jugde is red!
Robo-judge is blue!
Vodka vodka vodka
Holy Secular Temple
Re-educates you!

How are your plans coming along?
 
Border Reiver said:
I might have to give that a read.
Click to expand...

The working title is 'Catharsis Nightmare'. The story is a narrative told from one of the few humans left alive, The standing population was reduced to just 100k due to a combination of multiple wars, food poisoning, robot malfunctions and starvation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom