Loose Change

Status
Not open for further replies.
geggy said:
I'm not trying to win at anything, just bringin my perspectives of sept 11 to the table for you to think about, is all.
Click to expand...

Leave your "perspectives" at home. Bring us some facts.
Believing something is one way does not make it so.
 
DavidJames said:
Of course you believe they are legit, because you do not think critically. You are a conspiracy nut, at one point you said you didn't want to be considered a CT, well until you actually start to think critically, you are a CT
Click to expand...

If I didn't know how to think crticially then I would've swallowed the bs that were laid out in the sept 11 commission report while reading it, which I doubt any of you actually read.

I already caught gravy bs'ing about the osama tape without subtitles so it makes me wonder what other things he had bs'd about.
 
dubfan said:
They'll look at video of AA 77 hitting the Pentagon and we'll be in for another round of armchair photogrammetry and discussions of specular highlights and pods and missiles and all the other crap that's plagued the discussions of the two WTC planes.
Click to expand...
I actually read a post a few weeks back that said if the FBI does release video of flight 77 hitting the Pentagon, the poster still won't believe it because in the amount of time that's passed it would have been trivial to create a Hollywood-style fake.
 
geggy said:
I already caught gravy bs'ing about the osama tape without subtitles so it makes me wonder what other things he had bs'd about.
Click to expand...

You caught him did you? I must have missed that. Please give me the post number.
However, what makes you think that video cameras have built in subtitle makers? Subtitles need to be added at some point. You see, people need to say words before they can be added, unless you've got Slyvia Browne on the case ;) There must be a copy of that video without them.
 
geggy said:
If I didn't know how to think crticially then I would've swallowed the bs that were laid out in the sept 11 commission report while reading it, which I doubt any of you actually read.

I already caught gravy bs'ing about the osama tape without subtitles so it makes me wonder what other things he had bs'd about.
Click to expand...
Of course the original Osama video didn't have subtitles. But when did I say I had a video with OR without subtitles, you blithering idiot? Can you, an "imaging specialist," imagine a video that has subtitles in some parts and not others? And why haven't you watched the video yet? What are you afraid of? It's only Osama the Harmless.

If you think I'm b.s.ing you, do your homework and prove it. I do my homework, and i have proved you to be wrong every single day. Isn't it time you got one on me? Won't it feel good? Give it the old college try, geggy.

Here's a challenge: you go over each of my posts in this thread and pick out the errors. I'll do the same with yours. We tally things up, and pay $10 for each error we've made. The money goes to a worthy 9/11-related cause. Are you with me?

Every day you say at least one thing that's blazingly stupid, it's pointed out to you that it's stupid, and why it's stupid, and yet the next day you come back and do it again. And again. And again. And again. Every single day.

It's not my nature to call people names in public, but geggy, you have made quite a public spectacle of your ignorance and unwillingness to learn from your mistakes.

How do you feel about your approach to all this? Is it working out? Are you comfortable with how it's going? Seeing good progress, are you?
 
Last edited:
chipmunk stew said:
I actually read a post a few weeks back that said if the FBI does release video of flight 77 hitting the Pentagon, the poster still won't believe it because in the amount of time that's passed it would have been trivial to create a Hollywood-style fake.
Click to expand...
And then there's the guy who said that if video of the Pentagon crash was released, he'd leave the country. Not sure I get the logic there.
 
dubfan said:
Thanks. I'm surprised I've lasted this long. I think it's mostly kids over there, and I think they mean well. It's hard to get too angry at them. I'm disappointed in them that they don't think more clearly, and I'm starting to get REALLY angry at the government, because it's their own actions that have created the fertile soil for this crap to grow, but the people I'm most pissed off about are Dylan Avery & Co. These guys are frauds, pure and simple, and they have no idea how destructive they are.
Click to expand...
I'm starting to feel sorry for them.* You're tearing them to pieces, VWfan!


*(The loyal followers, not the ringleaders! I'd love to give Dylan a kick in the groin...)
 
chipmunk stew said:
I'm starting to feel sorry for them.* You're tearing them to pieces, VWfan!


*(The loyal followers, not the ringleaders! I'd love to give Dylan a kick in the groin...)
Click to expand...
I just read that thread. I'd like to congratulate you on a job well done before you get banned, dubfan!
 
Here's a pic showing WTC 5, WTC 6, and the collapsed WTC 7. Now, the CTers assure us that WTC 7 hardly had any damage at all, it was too far away to have taken a big hit. And yet, this pic clearly shows extensive damage to the building across the sreet (further away from the towers) from WTC 7! How do you explain that?
 
geggy said:
If I didn't know how to think crticially then I would've swallowed the bs that were laid out in the sept 11 commission report while reading it
Click to expand...
Really, then you will have no problem telling me specifically what in the report was bs, please include details regarding why along with the supporting analysis.
 
WildCat said:
Here's a pic showing WTC 5, WTC 6, and the collapsed WTC 7. Now, the CTers assure us that WTC 7 hardly had any damage at all, it was too far away to have taken a big hit. And yet, this pic clearly shows extensive damage to the building across the sreet (further away from the towers) from WTC 7! How do you explain that?
Click to expand...

And here's a shot from behind WTC7 (on the left), looking towards the wreckage of 6. The north tower was 200 meters away. Look at the size of that beam in the foreground.
8790445cfb28cec40.jpg
 
chipmunk stew said:
I actually read a post a few weeks back that said if the FBI does release video of flight 77 hitting the Pentagon, the poster still won't believe it because in the amount of time that's passed it would have been trivial to create a Hollywood-style fake.
Click to expand...

That seems rather pointless. If it was a conspiracy, why not create the Hollywood-style fake beforehand, then release it as security-camera footage -- or better, leak it immediately afterward?
 
TjW said:
That seems rather pointless. If it was a conspiracy, why not create the Hollywood-style fake beforehand, then release it as security-camera footage -- or better, leak it immediately afterward?
Click to expand...

It amazes me how all these conspirators always seem to have a visual effects department that's better than Industrial Light & Magic, yet no-one in the relatively small VFX industry has ever heard of it. Where do they get their staff?
 
Shrinker said:
It amazes me how all these conspirators always seem to have a visual effects department that's better than Industrial Light & Magic, yet no-one in the relatively small VFX industry has ever heard of it. Where do they get their staff?
Click to expand...


There in is the center of the CT'ers - They saw it done on TV once.

"I'm not a controlled demolition expert, but I saw one on TV once. . . "

"I'm not a structural engineer, but I saw one on TV"

"I don't know what a 757 crash looks like, but there was a plane crash on TV and it didn't look like that."

Chief "Saw it in the movies?" Dylan Avery, who, if you find out the genesis of his "Loose Change" He was going to make a FICTIONAL film at first - but instead he made a Duckumentary, and the quacks have never stopped!
 
60hzxtl said:
There in is the center of the CT'ers - They saw it done on TV once.

"I'm not a controlled demolition expert, but I saw one on TV once. . . "

"I'm not a structural engineer, but I saw one on TV"

"I don't know what a 757 crash looks like, but there was a plane crash on TV and it didn't look like that."

Chief "Saw it in the movies?" Dylan Avery, who, if you find out the genesis of his "Loose Change" He was going to make a FICTIONAL film at first - but instead he made a Duckumentary, and the quacks have never stopped!
Click to expand...

and thats exactly what happened. he claims that he did research cause he wanted to do a fictional piece, and then found out its not so fictional after all.

in reality, he was sucked into the conspiracy thinking it was truth and has yet to figure this out.
 
hey geggy

i saw a few posts back you were saying something about the norad standdown. now, why does it matter if norad stood down if the buildings were already rigged for demolition!!
 
WildCat said:
BTW dubfan, nice work in this thread. Only a matter of time before they ban you for the offense of thinking critically.
Click to expand...


After reading this thread...wow.

They're actually claiming that an airliner CAN'T HIT THE GROUND if it's going faster than 400 mph!

This, coupled with the revelation that skyscrapers are immune to fire, is quite a relief to me. The world is much safer than I thought! Well, it would be except for all the murderous globalists, of course.
 
Ramooone said:
hey geggy

i saw a few posts back you were saying something about the norad standdown. now, why does it matter if norad stood down if the buildings were already rigged for demolition!!
Click to expand...

Also, geggy, please provide us with examples of crisis situations in which fighters were scrambled significantly faster that they were on 9/11, and in which they flew at or near top speed to reach their destination. You do have that information, don't you? Of course you do. Otherwise it wouldn't make much sense to say that they "should have" responded faster.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom