Loose Change

Status
Not open for further replies.
kookbreaker said:
What does this prove? You are seeing 'squibs' of explsive charges. The building has yet to start falling. The alleged 'squibs' you point out tkae plcae after the building has started falling.
Click to expand...
The 'squibs' are also not very directional--they blow out in a puff of dust sort of spherically. Contrast this with the streams of dust squirting out when the WTC collapsed that are clearly directed by rapidly compressed air trying to equalize with the atmospheric pressure.
 
geggy said:
The demolishing of WTC started from the top.
Click to expand...

I think for once you got it right. The demolishing did start from the top, by the collapse of the floors that were plowed throught by the planes. Then ensued a cascading effect that completed the demolition. The demolition was controlled by physics and gravity.
 
May I ask you geggy why you are still here? Obviously nothing you say has any effect. So why insist?
 
Pardalis said:
May I ask you geggy why you are still here? Obviously nothing you say has any effect. So why insist?
Click to expand...
I'm working on a theory that he's here to keep us too busy to go over there.


ETA: And to keep me from every getting that recipe for Mexican corn.
 
Good afternoon geggy.
So which one, or combination of these various CTs are you now in favor of believing?
1. Suitcase Nuke planted to demolish the building because the high cost of asbestos removal?
2. Explosive charges built into the WTC from the begining to be detonated at some future time?
3. People secretly smuggling enough explosives into the WTC without being noticed?
Keeping in mind that any of these needed to be timed perfectly with someone elses attempt at taking down to WTC with planes.
And somehow these CTs seem more plausible to you then the official report? You do realize that the official report will have some gaps and some missing info simply because the people writing the report might not have been the ones who organized the attacks in the first place?
JPK
 
geggy said:
Mr skinny you might want to google around for links.
Click to expand...
I"ll take that to mean that you have no evidence to support your statement that "It was an actual fact that ground zero crews were not allowed to wear respirators because they thought "it would frighten the public" so says the white house, which is why you didn't see very many of them wearing respirators."

I'm not doing your homework for you, geggy.
 
Ramooone said:
Heres a radio interview done with dylan. he's got a bunch of suckers who believe him.

http://chio_in_the_morning.podomatic.com/entry/2006-05-02T14_09_11-07_00
Click to expand...

Disturbing quote:

Dylan Avery said:
I mean any... anybody... anybody who you show the second edition to and they still can't believe you, which believe me is like a 5 percent margin. Cuz' i mean, its.. you know I'm on... I'm only saying this because I've heard it hundreds and hundreds of times a day. I mean this movie is so effective on people. I mean...
Click to expand...

Listening to the rest of the program, I'm beginning to think he might be right. The only person that didn't seem to buy into this lost his sister in the attack. They've got some Iraq war veteran crying because he feels he was betrayed by the government. And of course at the end they have to play, I'm proud to be an American. Pretty sickening. I'm really trying not to get fed up with the entire thing. I'm glad I don't live in Philly.
 
geggy said:
Hurtman...
That makes no sense....if what you've claimed was true, then the puff o' dust would have blasted out of more than just one window.

[qimg]http://www.explosive911analysis.com/B24.jpg[/qimg]

Either it was a very successful terrorist attack or it was a sloppy one..
Click to expand...

Do you EVER post pictures that don't look like a 1994 ultra-compressed JPEG ?
 
Just take a look at these overwhelming good reviews of the movie "V for Vendetta"

http://www.cinemamontreal.com/aw/cr...al/j.e/i.8531/s.0/f.V_pour_Vendetta_v_f_.html

It's one thing to enjoy a movie, but most of these reviewers consider it some kind of "wake up call"!

I guess the CT appeals to a part of our brains that likes to imagine alternate realities, or to imagin ourselves the victims of a greater evil. The only thing they don't realise is that this works best in movies, NOT REALITY.

I personnally disliked the movie.
 
geggy said:
The demolishing of WTC started from the top.
Click to expand...

geggy said:
Hurtman...
That makes no sense....if what you've claimed was true, then the puff o' dust would have blasted out of more than just one window.

B24.jpg


Either it was a very successful terrorist attack or it was a sloppy one..
Click to expand...

So... no micro-nuke under the building, after all ?
 
Huntsman said:
Like I said before, it's not so much a "theory" as a "loose collection of unrelated hypotheses".
Click to expand...
I wouldn't even give it that much credibility, it's a conclusion in search of any semi-coherent narrative.
 
bob_kark said:
Disturbing quote:



Listening to the rest of the program, I'm beginning to think he might be right. The only person that didn't seem to buy into this lost his sister in the attack. They've got some Iraq war veteran crying because he feels he was betrayed by the government. And of course at the end they have to play, I'm proud to be an American. Pretty sickening. I'm really trying not to get fed up with the entire thing. I'm glad I don't live in Philly.
Click to expand...

Hello all. Had this thread pointed out to me by someone on another forum, and I just want to echo these sentiments.

I'm so angry at these lunatic CTs -- for exactly these reasons -- that I can hardly see straight. There's a thread in the LC forum "Lounge" claiming you guys are "obsessed" with LC.... If only they knew that everyone is coming here for the comedy.

It's been a pleasure watching you guys demolish this piece of rubbish. Sorry for the threadjack... Please continue.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom