Loose Change

[geggy]

I aplogize for the error. Sometime the internet provider on my tmobile sidekick can get screwy. I think I'mn being spied on. Not being paranoid, I have nothing to hide. Theyre the ones who are being paranoid. heh

 

[Stellafane]

I knew it! As soon as I learned that Judy Wood, that oft-referenced professor of billiard ball physics, was a specialist in the material properties of human teeth, I suspected that JPD was a covert mouthpiece for the Rebellion.

Like everything else in CT Land, it all makes sense when you think about it long enough -- the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry as a "mouthpiece."

 

[Mongrel]

I think I'mn being spied on. Not being paranoid,

You really ought to look that word up Geggy...Here's a handy link

 

[Mojo]

i find it twistedly funny that you would associate sept 11 activists with the ufo conspiracy theorsts. I didnt think you would stoop that low. Tell me again, what did UFO have to do with sept 11? I'm really interested in hearing your theories.

I doubt that any of the sceptics on the forum think UFOs have anything to do with 11th September.

I have no doubt that you could make the connection if you really tried, though.

 

[NobbyNobbs]

Tell me again, what did UFO have to do with sept 11? I'm really interested in hearing your theories.

Nobody is suggesting that UFOs had anything to do with 9/11. What they are saying is that the thought processes you are going through are similar to those that the UFO conspirasists go through.

Yeah I'm antibush. Any sane person would see that the malevolent activities that he partipicates himself into is against the humanity and i think I've had enough of it. Can you really blame me for it?

No, I can't blame you. I'm not very fond of the guy myself. But that doesn't make him responsible for 9/11. I'm not fond of my neighbor, either, but that doesn't imply he was involved as well. Proof is needed.

I'm curious on what you think of the catapulting of the propaganda on television across the entire NYC region during the months after the sept 11 catastrophe. It wasn't a year until after the catalyzing event that I contacted a friend from NYC and she explained to me that the repeated images of the plane crashing, towers falling were still being shown on television at the time whereas in my home state it was forbidden to show images of sept 11 on television. How do you explain that?

"Forbidden"?? What state do you live in? How do you know it was forbidden? That's a direct violation of the consititution, and I'm surprised there wasn't a lawsuit. Can you provide articles or editorials concerning this injunction? I'd be very interested in seeing them.

 

[Ersby]

It wasn't a year until after the catalyzing event that I contacted a friend from NYC and she explained to me that the repeated images of the plane crashing, towers falling were still being shown on television at the time whereas in my home state it was forbidden to show images of sept 11 on television. How do you explain that?

It's clearly a result of meddling by the CIA.

 

[Stellafane]

I doubt that any of the sceptics on the forum think UFOs have anything to do with 11th September.

I have no doubt that you could make the connection if you really tried, though.

Already been done: http://www.orbwar.com/ufo-photos-wtc-attack-9-11.htm

 

[kookbreaker]

What state do you live in?

Must...resist....easy....joke!!

 

[Gravy]

Nobody is suggesting that UFOs had anything to do with 9/11.

I do think that UFO involvement is every bit as plausible as anything geggy has suggested.

"Forbidden"?? What state do you live in? How do you know it was forbidden?

For its residents' protection, many things that are available to you and I are forbidden in the state of Fear, Confusion, and Misapprehension.

 

[Shrinker]

i find it twistedly funny that you would associate sept 11 activists with the ufo conspiracy theorsts. I didnt think you would stoop that low. Tell me again, what did UFO have to do with sept 11? I'm really interested in hearing your theories.

Okay eggy, if 911 cranks really are different from UFO cranks then there's no way we can use the UFO example to predict what will happen to the whole 911 "truth" movement is there? So if we come back in a few decades we'll see that I got all of the following wrong...

The 911 truth movement will never reach a consensus about what happened on 911, simply because all their 'evidence' and anyalses are so obviously mutually exclusive, yet few of them have the backbone to criticize any 'evidence' which appears to implicate the Conspirators.

After being unable to formulate a consistent theory the 911 truth movement will become bitterly fragmented with public disputes between various competing theorists appearing all over the internet.

One or more individuals will come to light who claim to have insider knowledge of the plot or where somehow directly involved in it. They will of course be able to provide no convincing evidence of this. Supporters will claim its because the evidence is being erased.

There will be a number of breakthroughs which will turn out to be hoaxes. But when the number of hoaxes becomes high enough, theorists will begin to claim that they can't all be hoaxes.

More books will be written, more 'documentaries' assembled, more money will be made. Yet no living person will be directly and unambigiously accused, let alone brought to trial.

The 911 conspiracy will seep further and further into popular culture but yet be taken less and less seriously, and not make the slightest bit of difference.

As more real information emerges, the theories will become even more desperately convoluted, to the point that no serious 'truth seeker' believes the silly theories that were knocking around back in 2006

911 theorists will reach old age and die, having unearthed nothing of any value, or even gotten into trouble with the law.

 

[Dr Adequate]

It wasn't a year until after the catalyzing event that I contacted a friend from NYC and she explained to me that the repeated images of the plane crashing, towers falling were still being shown on television at the time whereas in my home state it was forbidden to show images of sept 11 on television. How do you explain that?

How do YOU explain that, geggy?

You seem to be alleging that, in your state, the conspiracy was using its sinister powers to suppress its own propaganda. Why?

 

[aggle-rithm]

Still attacken the messenger and not the message eh?

There's a message? Will you be sharing it with us at some point?

 

[Hellbound]

There's a message? Will you be sharing it with us at some point?

He already has, you just have to use your "Secret DeKoder Ring^TM". Check this week's Captain Crunch.

ETA:

By the way, gigger, that wasn't Ad Hominem. Ad Hominem is not a fancy-shmansy word for insults. Ad Hominem is specifically claiming the argument is wrong because the person making it is an idiot/liar/ugly/smells funny/whatever.

My argument is that you're an idiot because your argument is wrong. Spectacularly wrong. Astoundingly wrong. So wrong, the word wrong doesn't even begin to describe how wrong it is. We need a new word to describe something as wrong as your arguments...geggerious.

My comments were a conclusion based on evidence, not an argument against your "theory".

Although, it isn't even a theory, as it's internally inconsistent and disconnected. More of a hypothetical amalgam.

 

[60hzxtl]

Conspiracy?

The great thing about chasing shadows, pookas, and imaginary bad guys, (and big foot)! is that you never catch them - you chase and chase, and never catch 'em. Unlike real bad guys.


All this time on spent on "squibs" "controlled demo" and we haven't even scratched the rest of the loose changers idiotic conclusions.


(Like what direction does the sun come up in Dylan Avery? Pod? ok- its a pod, now where is the engine shadow? First rule of film making - where is the light coming from kids?)

 

[aggle-rithm]

Tell me again, what did UFO have to do with sept 11? I'm really interested in hearing your theories.

Wackos believe in UFO's. Wackos also believe in 9/11 conspiracies. (Not the same wackos, necessarily, but wackos nevertheless. ) Why do we call them wackos, you ask? Because neither have any substantial basis for their beliefs. The only difference between them and a crazy man talking to himself on the street corner is that they are able to mask their delusions with a facade of "scholarship" and "research".

 

[60hzxtl]

Aggle - its harder and harder to find the crazy guy on the corner talking to himself - sometimes it REALLY is a cell phone.

The conversation is the same, but there IS somebody on the other end.

 

[aggle-rithm]

It wasn't a year until after the catalyzing event that I contacted a friend from NYC and she explained to me that the repeated images of the plane crashing, towers falling were still being shown on television at the time whereas in my home state it was forbidden to show images of sept 11 on television. How do you explain that?

Here are my explanations:

"It wasn't a year until after the catalyzing event that I contacted a friend from NYC"

Explanation: You're not a very good friend. It took you a YEAR to contact this person after 9/11?


"repeated images of the plane crashing, towers falling were still being shown on television at the time"

Explanation: Slow news days.
Alternate explanation: Cutbacks at the NYC TV stations, so old footage is recycled.
Alternate explanation: Competition for ratings.

Pick one.


"whereas in my home state it was forbidden to show images of sept 11 on television."

Explanation: You are mistaken about the images being forbidden. It's a YEAR OLD NEWS STORY, for heavens sake. Why would they still be showing it?

Alternate explanation: You are mistaken about the images being forbidden. You haven't seen it because you don't watch the news, since George Bush has a stranglehold on the media.

Now, how do YOU explain why any of this is relevant?

 

[aggle-rithm]

Aggle - its harder and harder to find the crazy guy on the corner talking to himself - sometimes it REALLY is a cell phone.

The conversation is the same, but there IS somebody on the other end.

Well, if he's wearing a shoe on his head, that's a dead giveaway.

ETA: I mean no disrespect to the mentally ill. They can't help the way they are. However, geggy and his ilk are being willfully insane. They can back away from the precipice whenever they choose.

 

[Hellbound]

Here are my explanations:

"It wasn't a year until after the catalyzing event that I contacted a friend from NYC"

Explanation: You're not a very good friend. It took you a YEAR to contact this person after 9/11?


"repeated images of the plane crashing, towers falling were still being shown on television at the time"

Explanation: Slow news days.
Alternate explanation: Cutbacks at the NYC TV stations, so old footage is recycled.
Alternate explanation: Competition for ratings.

Pick one.


"whereas in my home state it was forbidden to show images of sept 11 on television."

Explanation: You are mistaken about the images being forbidden. It's a YEAR OLD NEWS STORY, for heavens sake. Why would they still be showing it?

Alternate explanation: You are mistaken about the images being forbidden. You haven't seen it because you don't watch the news, since George Bush has a stranglehold on the media.

Now, how do YOU explain why any of this is relevant?

You missed an explanation, aggle. It was a year after the event.

One year later.

I don't think there was a single network that didn't have some type of memorial show on the anniversary date, and you would expect a LOT more of this in New York. And, likely, some networks may have made the decision not to broadcast the more disturbing scenes from that day, leading to gledgy's "banned from showing footage" comments.

It's geggerious.

 

[Belz...]

Yeah I'm antibush. Any sane person would see that the malevolent activities that he partipicates himself into is against the humanity and i think I've had enough of it.

You claim to be a sane person, but then you claim that Bush is anti-humanity. Paranoia is not sane, Geggy.

I'm curious on what you think of the catapulting of the propaganda on television across the entire NYC region during the months after the sept 11 catastrophe. It wasn't a year until after the catalyzing event that I contacted a friend from NYC and she explained to me that the repeated images of the plane crashing, towers falling were still being shown on television at the time whereas in my home state it was forbidden to show images of sept 11 on television. How do you explain that?

No, how do YOU explain that ?