• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Loose Change

Status
Not open for further replies.
geggy said:
fbi.gov updates osama's file on Nov 01. Sept 11, the mecca of all Osama's terror activities, was not mentioned...
http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/fugitives/laden.htm
Click to expand...
The update was to the reward info:
The Rewards For Justice Program, United States Department of State, is offering a reward of up to $25 million for information leading directly to the apprehension or conviction of Usama Bin Laden. An additional $2 million is being offered through a program developed and funded by the Airline Pilots Association and the Air Transport Association.
Click to expand...

Fool.
 
cloudshipsrule said:
Utter nonsense! JUST LOOK AT THE WAY THE BUILDINGS COLLAPSED. Really; Take 15 seconds and look at the way the buildings collapsed. Damn it, man! Had the bottom portion of the core been weakened by explosions designed to take down the building, tens of thousands of tons of top floors collapsing on themselves would have caused the ENTIRE building to collapse simultaneously, or you would have at least seen the bottom of the building shift under the weight of the collapsing floors.

Or are you saying that some demolition crew was SO GOOD that they calculated the exact number of support members to cut, the exact number to remove and the exact amount of explosive force necessary to simply weaken the bottom of the building just enough so that ONLY when REST OF THE ENTIRE FRIGGIN' BUILDING finally landed on the bottom floors, the bottom floors actually collapsed? Is that what you're saying? If so, what in hell would that have accomplished? Gravity is a whole lot cheaper.
Click to expand...
Welcome to the forum, cloudshipsrule. Good post. Since you're new here, you probably aren't aware of bottom-core-weakening-temporary-antigravity-bomb technology. It's one of those things the Project for the New American Century were on about in their "New Pearl Harbor" missive. Stick around. geggy will tell you all about it.
 
geggy said:
The wtc buildings were intacted when the basement bomb exploded (like in 93). In event of building implosion, demo crew strips and cuts cores to weaken the structure. Basement bomb blast the bottom portion of the building's core first, then everything comes down. The bottom core of WTC was blasted to weaken the bottom portion of the core. Then the top portion was possibly blasted when it first came down. Explosive charges began to set off in timely pattern to cut and weaken the structure.
Click to expand...
Considering you have provided no evidence what so ever to support this claim, I have to assume you are simply lying.

Geggy: Why are you lying?
 
geggy said:
I'm sayin that the bush administration has a stranglehold on the media just as hitler did during the nazi regime. I
Click to expand...


Gigli, if this is true, it's absolutely astounding that the news is allowed to report a drop in the Prez's approval rating every time it happens. Shouldn't they be gagging anchormen left and right?
 
geggy said:
Yo I aint sympathyzing osama. Of course he's guilty of many terror activities in the past. Maybe that's what led you to easily believe he had involvement in sept 11 attacks.
Click to expand...
You certainly aren't with us. "Us" being defined here as people who are not with al Qaeda.
 
geggy said:
Paragshenis...

Nano-nookular containing thermite...

http://www.technologyreview.com/read_article.aspx?ch=nanotech&sc=&id=14105&pg=1
Click to expand...
a) It's still just thermite. Faster and hotter burning, but still not an explosive.
b) What the holy hell is "nano-nuclear"? Are you implying they used a nuclear weapon in New York City and nobody knows about it? That would be your most ignorant claim yet.
c) How did they use a weapon which was being researched in 2005 in 2001? Do they have time machines as well?
d) Why do you trust anything in this article? It's from a mainstream source, and the people reporting the results are government scientists. You are totally inconsistent about what constitutes a trustworthy source.
 
Feng-Shui, not Bush

Gravy,

Thanks for the welcome! I have been doing a lot of research on Feng-Shui-induced paranormal-explosions, which is why the WTC collapse is of interest to me. The Bush administration had no hand in the WTC terrorist attack. A force much more sinister than Bush and his cronies is behind the collapse of the buildings. I have no doubt that terrorists hijacked planes and flew them into the buildings, but why the buildings actually collapsed is up for debate. It is simply a theory at this point in time, and there are a few dots left to connect, but I believe this:

Minoru Yamasaki, the designer of the WTC buildings, was born in Seattle, but just happened to have an Asian-sounding name. Chinatown is located in Manhattan. Just coincidence?

Minoru also designed the Eastern Airlines Unit Terminal in Boston in 1968, just 33 years before 9/11, which is a multiple of 11. Just coincidence?

I believe that Minoru was heavily involved in Feng-Shui, and the WTC buildings are an example of Feng-Shui gone awry. The WTC buildings were so heavily influenced by Minoru's belief in Feng-Shui that they experienced a phenomenon I'm going to coin called 'Feng-Shui Guo Zai', or 'Feng-Shui Overload'.

The combined forces of the plane's impact and the Feng-Shui Guo Zai actually created paranormal-explosions in the building's core, ultimately leading to the building's collapse. Or do you think it's simply coincidence that Minoru died in 1986, just 15 years prior to 9/11, which is not a multiple of 11?
 
Last edited:
hmmm, intriguing theory. So the arrangement of the stairwells and elevator shafts in the center of the towers didn't let the negative energy out, then when the airliners hit, there was a surfeit of negative energy which built up until it exploded, causing smoke and dust to puff out of the windows, and brought the whole building down? That would explain a lot.

There seems to be something missing: conspiracy. Please go re-work your theory until it involves Globalists and the Carlyle Group.
 
geggy said:
The wtc buildings were intacted when the basement bomb exploded (like in 93). In event of building implosion, demo crew strips and cuts cores to weaken the structure. Basement bomb blast the bottom portion of the building's core first, then everything comes down. The bottom core of WTC was blasted to weaken the bottom portion of the core. Then the top portion was possibly blasted when it first came down. Explosive charges began to set off in timely pattern to cut and weaken the structure.
Click to expand...

That's still contradictory. If the top part comes down, there's no need to weaken the bottom part. The hammer effect will be enough.

You also speak of those things as though you knew, but you've been shown consistently wrong on all your claims so far, so there's no reason to be so sure of yourself.
 
Pardalis said:
Can't you see how illogical this sounds?

You've been lessening Al Qaeda's importance in this 9/11 equation from day one! I think that's a cause for concern. It's complete stupidity.
Click to expand...

Suppose Al Qaeda wanted more recruits in the United States. They might try improving their image by removing themselves from 9/11 and placing blame on the U.S. government. Claims of a massive government conspiracy in a huge disaster might be what it takes to turn the people against democracy, paving the way for anarchy and the militants can take power without a government to stop them. But then again, Al Qaeda only wants Muslims and converts to fight for them. Geggy isn't arguing for Islam... yet.
 
879044574a8e98c58.jpg

Dec13_OsamaVideoText3.jpg


Close but no cigar. Nice photoshopping job, by the way. I graduated from RIT with a degree in imaging techonology. Can you please provide the top picture with the subtitle? Thanks.

if you want to look at more pictures, you can go here...http://www.september11news.com/OsamaEvidence.htm

Next osama video tape came at the most convience time for the Bush administration...just 3 days before the '04 election.

obl20.jpg


"But because it seemed to him that occupying himself by talking to the little girl about the goat and its butting was more important than occupying himself with the planes and their butting of the skyscrapers, we were given three times the period required to execute the operations - all praise is due to Allah." -Osama turned into comedian.

Full transcript here...http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/79C6AF22-98FB-4A1C-B21F-2BC36E87F61F.htm

(01/19/06 -- DURHAM) - A Duke professor says he is doubtful about Thursday's audiotape from Osama bin Laden.

http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=local&id=3828678

One of the many skeptics of the audio tapes that are consistently put out to the public.
 
geggy said:
Yo I aint sympathyzing osama. Of course he's guilty of many terror activities in the past. Maybe that's what led you to easily believe he had involvement in sept 11 attacks.
Click to expand...

Again, that's not proof. That's another inane claim on your part.

Sheesh! Do you have ANY idea what it means to research, or back up a claim, or anything ?

29 you say ? Months ?
 
geggy said:
Close but no cigar. Nice photoshopping job, by the way. I graduated from RIT with a degree in imaging techonology. Can you please provide the top picture with the subtitle? Thanks.
Click to expand...

What ? Are you claiming that he doctored the photo to make it LOOK like Bin Laden ?

What ? Are we ALL part of the cover-up, now ?
 
Belz... said:
That's still contradictory. If the top part comes down, there's no need to weaken the bottom part. The hammer effect will be enough.

You also speak of those things as though you knew, but you've been shown consistently wrong on all your claims so far, so there's no reason to be so sure of yourself.
Click to expand...

Perhaps you should ask Geggy for photos of the bottom explosion happening before the planes hit.

Oh, and how much molten steel do you normally find after a controlled demolition?
 
CurtC said:
hmmm, intriguing theory. So the arrangement of the stairwells and elevator shafts in the center of the towers didn't let the negative energy out, then when the airliners hit, there was a surfeit of negative energy which built up until it exploded, causing smoke and dust to puff out of the windows, and brought the whole building down? That would explain a lot.

There seems to be something missing: conspiracy. Please go re-work your theory until it involves Globalists and the Carlyle Group.
Click to expand...
Also Jews and homosexuals. They're always blowing things up with chi!
 
geggy said:
"But because it seemed to him that occupying himself by talking to the little girl about the goat and its butting was more important than occupying himself with the planes and their butting of the skyscrapers, we were given three times the period required to execute the operations - all praise is due to Allah."-Osama turned into comedian.
Click to expand...
Yes, I see it all now!

Osama bin Laden uses sarcasm. Therefore Bush destroyed the twin towers using his magic powers of TEH CONTROLLED DEMOLITION THAT MELTS TEH STEEL!!!!!

It all fits together like an intricate jigsaw.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom