Loose Change vs. William Rodriguez

It's like watching a massive carwreck unfold before your eyes. A carwreck involving circus clowns. (Because everything is funny if it's clowns).

-Gumboot
 
These little LCF brownshirters crack me up. They deleted the original thread, and then someone started another thread to ask why that was deleted, so they closed that thread.

Ask questions, demand answers. Unless you ask us questions, in which case, you are just a splitter.
 
JamesB said:
These little LCF brownshirters crack me up. They deleted the original thread, and then someone started another thread to ask why that was deleted, so they closed that thread.

Ask questions, demand answers. Unless you ask us questions, in which case, you are just a splitter.
Click to expand...

The threads can be deleted, but the damage remains. I wonder if the guys at SLC got a screenshot....
 
William_Rodriguez said:
Troubles me for sure


Absolutely not. I challenge them to check with the Post giving permission if it was real for them to expose me. I never heard from those writers before.


It was talked about that a fund should be placed for them. My interview, will be considered with all the footage. I did interview with them in California but did not sign any release agreement, holding the option open to the talks.


I did not to give names until I cleared with the victims first to know if that was ok for them


Thanks

TAM:)

Thank you for doing it right.
Click to expand...

Well it sounds to me like things got talked about, but no paper work was done. This is never a good thing, as it is too easy for people to go back on their word...

Your idea of not giving the names until ok'ed by the victims/witnesses is respectable, and the right call.

As for the NY Post issue, from your perspective, no such interview occured. Would be nice, for fairness sake, to get Dylan's pov on this, to see how he or his people came up with you "going to the NY post".

My suggestion, for the sake of fairness, would be to withhold your own segment of the doc pending some arrangement that can be arranged (if you are able to) and to provide them with the witness names (if agreed to by said witnesses) and allow them to talk to them, without sticking money into the mix on either side. Ultimately I just wanted clarification, this dispute, is of course, between you and LTW.

TAM:)
 
gumboot said:
It's like watching a massive carwreck unfold before your eyes. A carwreck involving circus clowns. (Because everything is funny if it's clowns).

-Gumboot
Click to expand...

You know, I think we may be looking at a million here....I distinctly remember something about both of us (and 8den and a couple of others) mumbling something about Avery getting pro-distro when the sky fell down......
 
nicepants said:
The threads can be deleted, but the damage remains. I wonder if the guys at SLC got a screenshot....
Click to expand...
I always save LC threads like that when they're mentioned here. Some day they'll thank me for archiving their early years.
 
T.A.M. said:
As for the NY Post issue, from your perspective, no such interview occured. Would be nice, for fairness sake, to get Dylan's pov on this, to see how he or his people came up with you "going to the NY post".
TAM:)
Click to expand...

I'm not taking sides here but IIRC Dylan stated that it "must" have been WR because only a few people knew (WR being one of them) and that the Page 6 article came out only a week after they did a seperate article on WR. Page 6 stated they received the info from "informed sources" and Dylan and co assumed it could only have been WR. Not exactly proof but not an unreasonable assumption either.

T.A.M., next time there's a hot thread like that you need to jump on it since you know it's not going to last long. :D I was also hoping someone was doing some "saving"...
 
Calcas said:
I'm not taking sides here but IIRC Dylan stated that it "must" have been WR because only a few people knew (WR being one of them) and that the Page 6 article came out only a week after they did a seperate article on WR. Page 6 stated they received the info from "informed sources" and Dylan and co assumed it could only have been WR. Not exactly proof but not an unreasonable assumption either.

T.A.M., next time there's a hot thread like that you need to jump on it since you know it's not going to last long. :D I was also hoping someone was doing some "saving"...
Click to expand...

I do not post at LCF, nor do I have plans to join, so I could not, would not post. (nor would i eat green eggs and ham...lol)

As for the fair or "unfair" assumption, yes it might be a fair ASSUMPTION, but I certainly would not think enough evidence to publicly accuse...that is the difference here.

TAM:)
 
So the truth movement are devouring one of their own?

How... unusual.
 
Well, the 9-11 conspiracy fantasy appears to have run dry, so now the paranoia moves to within the 'truth movement' itself.

Basically, they aint happy unless they have someone to be suspicious of.
 
uk_dave said:
Well, the 9-11 conspiracy fantasy appears to have run dry, so now the paranoia moves to within the 'truth movement' itself.

Basically, they aint happy unless they have someone to be suspicious of.
Click to expand...

True... there have been some quibbles about Alex Jones on LCF lately. I wonder if he is next?
 
I was particularily taken by this comment from a (new) truther on LCF....

Just to show you how idiotic the JREF members are, instead of taking the opportunity to use honey to get to Mr. Rodriguez on their side, they went to insults and ridicule!

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=16351&view=findpost&p=14607380
Click to expand...

Think he might have meant 'money'?

Anyway, whilst he attempts to use the LCF debacle as a way of attacking this forum, he merely shows his contempt for Rodriguez by implying that he could be enticed to switch sides.

With friends like that.......
 
Why do I get the feeling that someone is missing out on a great TV sitcom...or even a comedic box office hit.
Even the best of writers couldn't come up with the hilarity that just comes naturally when a troother starts talking! More especially, when troothers start bickering among themselves!
:dl:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom