• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Loose Change - Part IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
T.A.M. said:
This is something I often bring up with the truth crowd, in particular Lyte and Merc, who also claim to have evidence that will prove to the entire world 9/11 was an inside job...
Click to expand...
That's OK in a general sense, I suppose. I wouldn't feel too threatened by it though if I were Lyte or Merc. First you need to find someone willing to prosecute.

If that is true, than you are guilty, right now, of concealing evidence of a crime. That in itself is a crime, as is hampering or tampering with an crime investigation. You see, the investigation of 9/11 is still on going. The case hasnt been closed, so if you, and LTW, and Merc, and Lyte are withholding evidence in that investigation, even for a day, or a week, you are committing a crime yourselves.
Click to expand...
Well, even if it's true, they aren't guilty until convicted by a jury.

It's an intresting argument for arguments sake, but it's not going to convince them to stop doing what they are doing. *shrug*
 
Last edited:
T.A.M. said:
This is something I often bring up with the truth crowd, in particular Lyte and Merc, who also claim to have evidence that will prove to the entire world 9/11 was an inside job...

If that is true, than you are guilty, right now, of concealing evidence of a crime. That in itself is a crime, as is hampering or tampering with an crime investigation. You see, the investigation of 9/11 is still on going. The case hasnt been closed, so if you, and LTW, and Merc, and Lyte are withholding evidence in that investigation, even for a day, or a week, you are committing a crime yourselves.

TAM:)
Click to expand...

Even aside from the legal situation, if Avery really has evidence proving an inside job there's an ethical imperative to release it *now*. People are currently dying and suffering because of the belief that Al Qaeda was behind 9/11; the longer he delays the more blood there is on his hands. If Avery holds off releasing his Proof because he wants to make money from a film deal or he's worried about a few debunkers, Avery's a scum sucking bottom dweller.

On the other hand, LC-final cut might be the same big, steaming pile of BS that the other films were. In that case, it's a (another) insult to all those who were murdered on 9/11. Doing this a 3rd time means that Avery is a scum sucking bottom dweller.

Have I missed any alternatives here :D
 
jon said:
Even aside from the legal situation, if Avery really has evidence proving an inside job there's an ethical imperative to release it *now*. People are currently dying and suffering because of the belief that Al Qaeda was behind 9/11; the longer he delays the more blood there is on his hands. If Avery holds off releasing his Proof because he wants to make money from a film deal or he's worried about a few debunkers, Avery's a scum sucking bottom dweller.
Click to expand...
Again, this argument certainly takes the moral high ground, but I'd be interested to see if any of the lawyers on this forum would take on the case charging any truther with withholding evidence of crimes comitted by the US government.

ETA: I realize I disregarded the first few words of your post...but the legal argument is the interesting point to me. Sorry.
 
Last edited:
The legal criminal aspect of the argument, was merely a vehicle to convey the amorality of all that these "truth" videographers do and create.

I agree with you, skinny, that pratically, it is an empty threat to accuse them of a crime, but in a moral sense, it is exactly what they are guilty, IN MY EYES, of.

Cheers

TAM:)
 
T.A.M. said:
The legal criminal aspect of the argument, was merely a vehicle to convey the amorality of all that these "truth" videographers do and create.
Click to expand...
That's what I sorta thought, TAM

I agree with you, skinny, that pratically, it is an empty threat to accuse them of a crime, but in a moral sense, it is exactly what they are guilty, IN MY EYES, of.

Cheers

TAM:)
Click to expand...
Thanks for responding, TAM.
 
Iggy said:
I have just seen a secret preview of Loose Change Final Cut and it is IMMENSE. All of it's facts have been checked and it also includes some explosive interviews that are going to set 9/11 Truth alight.

2007 is going to be the year 9/11 Truth truly broke!
Click to expand...
You're kidding, right?

Loose Change was a fact-free, clumsy, "pod"-ridden piece of garbage. So bad, in fact, it had to be redone.

So we got Loose Change: Second Edition. It removed the pod nonsense, since apparently even potheads in Upstate couldn't believe that one, but still made no sense at all. We keep asking if there's even one claim they made in that bit of video that was true, and we haven't found one yet.

And you think Loose Change III: Return of the Troothers is going to be different?

I believe we're all familiar with the following expression: Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

And here you are, lining up to be fooled for a third time. Congratulations.
 
~enigma~ said:
Reminds me of good ole George when he said...fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again. :)
Click to expand...

A lot of people use that as evidence that W just isn't that bright. Well, that's unfair. It could simply be that he can't read the teleprompter very well.

Back to Loose Change III: Loosers in Paradise, it occurs to me that, perhaps, they have checked all of their facts.

There probably weren't any to check.

:Banane51: Hiyooo! Thank you, thank you! Remember to tip your server, folks, you've been great.
 
Loose Change Final Edit os gonna be shown at the Cannes Film Festival. Yesssssssssss!
 
Iggy said:
Loose Change Final Edit os gonna be shown at the Cannes Film Festival. Yesssssssssss!
Click to expand...

Well, they ate up "Farenheit 911". Of course, that had some production value, but I'd guess anything vaguely anti-American would go over big there.
 
Aaron Rosso gave a great interview the other day detailing insider information about 9/11. Did anybody see it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom