• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Loose Change - Part IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dumbest. Hate. Mail. Ever.

He posted this on YouTube profile as well. He is 19 years old.

U ignorant **** where u ****n droped on ur head when u were a baby or somthing, or where u raped by ur dad on christmas eve when ever he dressed up as santa claus and you sat on his lap under a blanket nAKED. But getting to the point here and off about u getting raped every day by ur dad u take a good logical video that makes sense to whoever watches it and u try to trash it with ur gay comments and also trying to act smart in the process, Just face it u like a guy who looks like a ****n monkey u ignorant twat you have no life and I also hate to tell you but you suck and u will die at a early age just because no one likes you or u might live a long time and be a outkast of human life and eventually u will lead to the demise of this race as we know it Ur a ****N GAY ASS **** UR REALLY A TRUE BALL LICKER LOOSE CHANGE I BELIVE IT AND BECAUSE U TRYED TO SPILL OUT UR OWN STUPID PROPAGANDA. U SUck.

PS: IF I EVER SEE YOU U BETTER NOT LET ME CATCH U STANDING UP WHEN U PEE.
Click to expand...
 
Nice to see another literate, intelligent, well spoken LC fan...lol
 
It is fun watching that forum self-destruct. Like a slow-motion train wreck.
 
It is the hypocritical nature of it that bothers me. I mean if the point of their site was purely for promotion of the movie, then why bother putting up the skeptics forum in the first place. Now they've made themselves look like fascists, when they didnt really have to.
 
OK, how about this for an opening post:
Everybody post your most convincing images related to 9/11 bull

...Skeptics can easily blow off words, but if you show them a picture it's much harder for them to do that
Click to expand...

Yes, we skeptics might just blow off their words, but we can't argue with pictures! And videos must be hundreds of times better!

So when we discuss topics over here, would you say we use more words, or pictures? Over at my other favorite message board, the Straight Dope Message Board, they don't even have the caability to post pictures, and they still manage to have a pretty high level of discourse. Funny that.
 
CurtC said:
OK, how about this for an opening post:


Yes, we skeptics might just blow off their words, but we can't argue with pictures! And videos must be hundreds of times better!

So when we discuss topics over here, would you say we use more words, or pictures? Over at my other favorite message board, the Straight Dope Message Board, they don't even have the caability to post pictures, and they still manage to have a pretty high level of discourse. Funny that.
Click to expand...

I find it amusing that they argue the building fell into its own footprint, thus it was a controlled demolition, while simultaneously arguing that the debris was flung so far out, that it must also be a controlled demolition. Which is it?
 
For the record,

I've taken a look at the analysis of the photo of the UA 93 mushroom cloud which CTers claim is a bomb and too big... or something...

I did my own analysis and the smoke matches perfectly what I'd expect from such an event at such a distance. The smoke cloud has a maximum width of 600 metres, with the central column rising about 60 metres wide, about 180 metres downwind (in the direction of flight) of the impact point.

Given the 10 MPH wind speed at the time this matches where I'd expect the cloud to be about 40 seconds after impact (or about 32 seconds after the photographer heard the impact). Smoke clouds size, expansion, colour, density, etc... is consistant, 40s post-event, with all other fireballing air crashing I have seen video of.

-Andrew
 
Wow...

I've never even made a single post at the LC forum, and I've been banned as well! :boggled:
(That has to qualify for a badge, right?)

Incidentially, my username over there was Baldrick - which may indicate that someone over there has seen me here (all 7 posts...) and made the Blackadder/Baldrick connection.

Yup, it's nazism all right...
 
They might also have just banned the range of ips in which you reside, or the domain. Funny you should concoct some elaborate conspiracy theory to explain it.
 
Wow, I wonder if there's anyone left. My alter-ego Blinker just got banned too. I had two posts, both a little cheeky, but both made nearly two weeks ago in a fairly obscure thread. They must be actively searching for skeptics to ban! I guess somebody's getting addicted to the thrill of it.
 
It's a wide IP ban, all right.

No-one on the SSSF board (has members from all around Australia) can even see the board. People who have never been there are banned. At this time, it would appear that no-one in Australia can see the board.

Fascism in action.
 
Obviousman said:
No-one on the SSSF board (has members from all around Australia) can even see the board. People who have never been there are banned. At this time, it would appear that no-one in Australia can see the board.

Fascism in action.
Click to expand...


I guess they didn't like my comments about the Night of the Long Knives...

:rolleyes:

I have been perma-banned too.

:D

-Andrew
 
Obviousman said:
It's a wide IP ban, all right.

No-one on the SSSF board (has members from all around Australia) can even see the board. People who have never been there are banned. At this time, it would appear that no-one in Australia can see the board.

Fascism in action.
Click to expand...

I'm an Aussie, I could get in this morning, but can't now. I have never been registered there or posted.

Blackadder_no said:
Wow...

I've never even made a single post at the LC forum, and I've been banned as well! :boggled:
(That has to qualify for a badge, right?)

Incidentially, my username over there was Baldrick - which may indicate that someone over there has seen me here (all 7 posts...) and made the Blackadder/Baldrick connection.

Yup, it's nazism all right...
Click to expand...

Dazed said:
They might also have just banned the range of ips in which you reside, or the domain. Funny you should concoct some elaborate conspiracy theory to explain it.
Click to expand...

Is it really a conspiracy theory for him to say that they may have banned him because they linked his two user names? If so, why is it worse than thinking that they may have banned his IP address?
 
gtc said:
Is it really a conspiracy theory for him to say that they may have banned him because they linked his two user names? If so, why is it worse than thinking that they may have banned his IP address?
Click to expand...


I doubt they linked his names...

They didn't click to mine...

Gumboot... rubber_boot.

And when johndoex asked for someone to ask him "anything" about flight he totally missed my joke when I asked:

"What is the air speed velocity of a fully laden swallow in flight?"

Thus demonstrating he is not familiar with classic British humour...:D

Those kids have probably never heard of Blackadder...

:cool:

-Andrew
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom