Loose Change - Part IV

[Class]

"guys, if we wanted to be signed by the big boys, we would have by now. we've turned down 7 figure contracts.

we are NOT compromising ourselves or our film. period. "


http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=9599

See? A man of principles if not principals.

Without distribution, LC Final, will remain a give-away. Worth what you pay for it; maybe that's the real meaning of "Loose Change" !

A seven figure contract?

I'm going to call my boss tonight and tell him he can take my job and shove it. I'm going to become a conspiracy film maker.

 

[defaultdotxbe]

im actually inclined to believe a 7 figure contract, and that he turned it down

remember, dylan and co think 13 figures worth of gold was stolen from the WTC, they probably figure a million is chump change and they can get more

plus, it probably was more like a retainer contract, just to keep him from signing with someone else, not necessarily a film or distribution contract (or spokesman deal, i wouldnt put that past him)

 

[Brainster]

About That Poll

As I mentioned on the radio last night, I did some poking around into the much-bruited poll that claims 36% of the public believes MIHOP or LIHOP. The information is here; I couldn't seem to locate the crosstabs.

First thing that pops out is that the poll seems to move back and forward between silly questions and serious ones. They spend a long time asking about past presidential matchups, then throw a couple of oddball ones into the mix, like Hillary Clinton versus Bill Clinton and Poppy Bush versus George W. Could it be that this indicated to the person being polled that this was just for grins? Unmentioned in the press releases was that 38% of the respondents thought it somewhat or very likely that the government was covering up evidence of intelligent life on other planets.

People are also much less likely to believe specific elements of the 9-11 conspiracy theories. Only 12% thought it somewhat or very likely that a missile hit the Pentagon; 80% thought unlikely. Controlled demolition at the WTC got 16%. I do wish they'd asked about Flight 93 being shot down; I suspect that's higher. And of course it would have been great if they'd asked about the "no-planes" theory.

 

[kookbreaker]

7 figures...in Yen, or Lira.

7 figures...if you count zeros in front of the first number.

 

[T.A.M.]

Man the best films in Cannes don't get that. Really. I mean, for starters, it has already been distributed on the net to as they quote "Tens of Millions".

Second, there are three of them. If each was offered 7 figure contracts, that is a minimum of 3 Million Dollars, for a 77 minute patched together mache of other peoples footage, interviews, and evidence. the cost to get all that stuff cleared, to avoid law suits, etc, why not get someone with REAL talent to edit it, to direct it, to narrate it, and pay them the same...they can't copyright anything in there except the interviews they conducted, their narration, and any animation they may have had created...oh ya, and the fantastic music.

Oh, and if this contract was offered and turned down, then name names. If it was legit, it isn't gonna hurt anyone to tell your group of followers who made you the offer....it stinks of BS.

 

[Ace_of_Sevens]

Quick explanation of collapse that should require only a high school understanding of physics:

If all the floors are of similar strength, once two collapse, pancaking inevitable. Te first one to collapse falls one story and collapses the floor below it. By the time that mass is another storey down, it has all the mass that collapsed the first level, plus additional mass from the floor below it. It also will be travelling faster as the first time it started from a stop and this time it has some initial velocity. Repeat for each floor in the building. If both mass and velocity increase, momentum increases. Unless one of the lower floors is stronger than the ones above, which wasn't the case in the WTC construction, the entire structure will come down.

 

[SRW]

Actually some of the best Pentagon debunking has come from the 9-11 Denial Movement. Let's see...

Catherder's post at Above Top Secret.

Jim Hoffman's post over at 911 Research.

These pics which somebody pointed out here a little earlier are good evidence. Look at the third and fourth pictures especially; they show a lot more damage than the Deniers claim.

This Pentagon animation does a terrific job of showing how the damage came from a 757.

Speaking for myself only, I've always thought the Pentagon missile/C-130, etc., stuff is nuttiness topped only by the no-planers. It's almost better not to debunk them, because they're so obviously wrong that they discredit the other Deniers.

I can still post over there, would you like me to post this for you In Merc's thread?

Steve

 

[steve s]

Oh, and if this contract was offered and turned down, then name names. If it was legit, it isn't gonna hurt anyone to tell your group of followers who made you the offer....it stinks of BS.

Someone named Class raised that question over at LC. Naturally JDX tried to clamp down on him.
I agree. It reeks of BS that's been left out to stew in this heat wave.

Steve S.

 

[Class]

Someone named Class raised that question over at LC. Naturally JDX tried to clamp down on him.
I agree. It reeks of BS that's been left out to stew in this heat wave.

Steve S.

That was me and I cannot believe how they all accept his claim without asking for any form of proof.

 

[T.A.M.]

I can believe it. If Dylan Avery said The Lord himself came to him and told him that the jews were to blame for everything, they would all believe.

Oh wait...that couldn't happen, because over there, D.A. is the lord, right??

 

[defaultdotxbe]

i think i fianlly got myself banned over there, although i had to poke at jdx (relatively) pretty hard, lol, basically called him out on whether he was cherry pickign or not

 

[apathoid]

i think i fianlly got myself banned over there, although i had to poke at jdx (relatively) pretty hard, lol, basically called him out on whether he was cherry pickign or not

MODS:

This person should be suspended for bad language, and the post deleted.

He's on our side.. if he wants to come in here and play with you guys in your pig pen.. slam you around a bit.. he's welcome to do so.. thats why we set up this section for you kids to play and trash...

But we will not accept insults from "outsiders". Dont like the bias? Go to your own house

He has got to be the worst moderator in the history of the internet. He doesnt even know what "moderating" is, let alone have the ability to practice it.
Someone else mentioned that this is sure-fire proof that he's never been in a position of responsibility and I agree 100%. If he is a airline pilot, I'm Orville Wright.

He suspended me yesterday for asking him what his theory is and not reading the thread....and I'm not kidding.

 

[defaultdotxbe]

Its just sort of a shame that people are going to see that article and not even look at the actual facts.

funny i feel the same way about people who watch loose change

apparently that was the nail in the coffin for me, lol

 

[Obviousman]

He has got to be the worst moderator in the history of the internet. He doesnt even know what "moderating" is, let alone have the ability to practice it.
Someone else mentioned that this is sure-fire proof that he's never been in a position of responsibility and I agree 100%. If he is a airline pilot, I'm Orville Wright.

He suspended me yesterday for asking him what his theory is and not reading the thread....and I'm not kidding.

if you also felt offended at the use of that word, you can report it here:

http: // invisionfree . com / report.php

Rather than have Invision shut down the board for a ToS violation, you might want to report which "moderator" supported - nay, encouraged - that sort of post because the poster was 'on their side', as it were.

 

[defaultdotxbe]

its funny, now they are going on about how JDX shoudl be banning us faster because they wouldnt last 5 seconds on our boards, someone should ask how long it took killtown to get banned from SLC (he wont be able to answer, he was never banned)

or if i banned chucksheen from xbox-scene for disagreeing with me there (im a head mod over there)

 

[Obviousman]

Oh, BTW....

Yes John DOH! I do realise you read this thread on JREF in your somewhat strange 'internet stalking'-like behaviour.

 

[apathoid]

Rather than have Invision shut down the board for a ToS violation, you might want to report which "moderator" supported - nay, encouraged - that sort of post because the poster was 'on their side', as it were.

Done

And I dont know what was more offensive, JAStewrats(?) remark, or the fact the lil Johnny deemed it to be within the forum rules.

 

[Obviousman]

And I've now been suspended.

Don't forget to keep those cards and letters coming, folks!

 

[Obviousman]

Done

And I dont know what was more offensive, JAStewrats(?) remark, or the fact the lil Johnny deemed it to be within the forum rules.

Quite correct - a clear case of bias to the extent that it's quite okay to break the rules - if you are on my side.

If anyone knows some psychologists, they should use JDX as a learning tool. There has to be a thesis in this, at least.

 

[T.A.M.]

I think that the report to the board host is appropriate, as if the board has a list of rules, and the mods are allowing some to break them without comment, and banning others for the same violations, then they are misusing the board.

But beyond that, why give them the opportunity.

I say noone else go there. They will get bored, JDX will go completely insane with noone to boss around. When they get so bored that they come around here, we wont have to worry about them banning any of us, and then the games can begin.

On a side note, I now know why you cannot win a sane argument with these guys. nesnyc showed me the way...you see, he does not believe that the "experts" in the field are the people we should be listening to when it comes to various aspects of 9/11. Now he wouldnt allude to who he thinks we should listen to, but he was clear that "STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS" are not the ones we should be getting expert advise from wrt the WTC colapses...