Loose Change - Part IV

[apathoid]

ive been posting at the LC forums today, in a debate with JDX in the GravyMarkyXRoberts thread, its like playing tennis with a wall over there

Best of luck not getting suspended!

 

[T.A.M.]

I am sure as soon as he grows bored with you he will suspend you.

Last I checked he was talking to himself in the MarkyX thread. he had four posts in a row, most of which was him talking to himself (as noone was replying) about how nobody better dare go toe to toe with him on issues of piloting, cause we know he is the jeesis Chriast of piloting now don't we.

 

[defaultdotxbe]

apparently he decided to leave because the s*** stepped in (according to him) must have smelled badly

either that or he doesnt want to be forced to back up any of his avionics claims

 

[apathoid]

I am sure as soon as he grows bored with you he will suspend you.

Last I checked he was talking to himself in the MarkyX thread. he had four posts in a row, most of which was him talking to himself (as noone was replying) about how nobody better dare go toe to toe with him on issues of piloting, cause we know he is the jeesis Chriast of piloting now don't we.

JohnD'oh might have the intellect of a mildly retarded bag of hammers, but man, he sure can type fast...

 

[WildCat]

I am sure as soon as he grows bored with you he will suspend you.

I think they'll ban him as soon as they figure out he's an admin at SLC.

 

[WildCat]

1) They have not studied / modeled the collapses themselves, but truncated the timeline at the onset of collapse, assuming that total collapse was then inevitable; hence the discussion in eg Gordon Ross's paper;
2) They say that they have not found any evidence corroborating alternative hypotheses such as planted explosives, without actually having researched those hypotheses (well, at least they haven't written up such research)

Will you need page numbers or will this do?

Thanks for the reply, gravy already answered along my line of thinking.

In all seriousness brumsen, doesn't it bother you that no structural engineers have come on board w/ the controlled demo theory yet? Or that the "Scholars for Truth" peer-review their own papers? Or that there is no evidence at all for the CT other than compressed video and flawed collapse times? Or the great number of outright lies (such as "no hijackers on the manifests") put forth by the CT community?

I could go on, but you get the picture.

BTW guys, brumsen has been very civil and actually responds to questions here. Please don't insult him or run him off the forum and leave us w/ only the geggys of the CT world to "debate". Debate is in quotes because I'm convinced geggy has never actually read a single reply to one of his posts...

 

[defaultdotxbe]

I think they'll ban him as soon as they figure out he's an admin at SLC.

that would require something resembling investigation on their part, lol

 

[twinstead]

BTW guys, brumsen has been very civil and actually responds to questions here. Please don't insult him or run him off the forum and leave us w/ only the geggys of the CT world to "debate".

I may be wrong, but there are only two "CT's" whom I have ever talked to who meet those criteria: brumsen, and turbonium, who posts on BAUT, Unexplained Mysteries, and the Apollo Hoax board.

I think it also helps those on either side to have a thick skin

 

[steve s]

I asked for a proof that the assumption that once the onset of collapse started (NISTs words) it was inevitable that it continue, is true. That need not be done by means of a simulation.

This has been addressed repeatedly. It's just simple physics. Momentum equals mass times velocity. Each floor that collapses just adds more mass to the falling portion of the building. Therefore the momentum of the falling portion is continually increasing throughout the collapse. Once it gets started nothing is going to stop it till it reaches the ground.

Steve S.

 

[defaultdotxbe]

well it looks liek jdx did end up getting bored

...but he didnt even ban me i went to the LC boards seeking martyrdom

 

[T.A.M.]

He'll be back as soon as anyone posts anything about any 9/11 topic that doesn't support his obnoxious view.

 

[Dog Town]

Agreed Wild,... think you were talking to me? I mailed him a My Bad earlier today. I really thought it was Bogglehead from another forum, and was just trying to ruffle feathers. I'll behave. Sorry Brums.

 

[Arkan_Wolfshade]

My name's Mark, too!

Well, it's Markabby, and the M, the first A, the R and the K are silent.

So, if I threw into the mix the fact that my IRL name is Mark R. H., it would just add to the confusion eh?

 

[defaultdotxbe]

my middle name is Michael, thats almost Mark

 

[realitybites]

My step-brother had a friend Mark. I hung out with him back in the 80s. Can I get death threats too?

 

[apathoid]

well it looks liek jdx did end up getting bored

...but he didnt even ban me i went to the LC boards seeking martyrdom

I think its becoming clear to me why he is at least somewhat knowledgable of aviation jargon, but so completely ignorant of aviation in general. He has, for the third time I've seen today, referenced flightinfo.com. Thats an aviation site where he can wade through hundreds of threads of aviator lingo and mimic it elsewhere sounding somewhat knowledgable. But, when principles like Bills felt pen trick make it into the discussion....Whoooosh - it goes right over his head.
My conspiracy is that he is(was) a student pilot, and has to pose as a pilot as a combination of envy(billzilla thread) and the need to feel important(look at his moderating).

If Godzilla is still around, I'll see if I can calloborate with him to make a quiz that lil Jonny wont be able to find answers to on Google. Not that that would make a diference, he'll just claim were wrong because he says so!!

 

[WildCat]

Agreed Wild,... think you were talking to me? I mailed him a My Bad earlier today. I really thought it was Bogglehead from another forum, and was just trying to ruffle feathers. I'll behave. Sorry Brums.

brumsen has this forum to discuss "Journal of 9/11 Studies" articles. Not much traffic there lately though, they haven't put out a Volume 2 yet and Vol. 1 has been discussed to death.

 

[gumboot]

Hi Guys,

Just wanted to let you know I have been painfully working my way through Alex Jones' "TerrorStorm" documentary (nearly 2hrs!). Its pretty awful. There's a lot of stuff I don't yet know much about, but the stuff I have looked into seems to follow the regular pattern of half truths and outright fabrications.

Once I have crawled my way through the remained of this bile I'll post a new thread with a summary of it, see if anyone else can add some insight...

This is the next logical progression of the 9/11 CTer - LC uncovers the government's set piece. TerrorStorm reveals their master plan.

It begins with a statement that A state of war only serves to impose domestic tyranny... so you can see where it is aimed...

Anyway... only an hour to go...

-Andrew

 

[realitybites]

Hi Guys,

Just wanted to let you know I have been painfully working my way through Alex Jones' "TerrorStorm" documentary (nearly 2hrs!). Its pretty awful. There's a lot of stuff I don't yet know much about, but the stuff I have looked into seems to follow the regular pattern of half truths and outright fabrications.

Once I have crawled my way through the remained of this bile I'll post a new thread with a summary of it, see if anyone else can add some insight...

This is the next logical progression of the 9/11 CTer - LC uncovers the government's set piece. TerrorStorm reveals their master plan.

It begins with a statement that A state of war only serves to impose domestic tyranny... so you can see where it is aimed...

Anyway... only an hour to go...

-Andrew

While we're on the subject of "other videos", I was just curious if there were any other debunkings in the works. I know videos are a dime a dozen for the CTers, so getting to every one of them would see most of us to our graves, but maybe picking one of Alex Jones' would be the next logical step?

I'm not volunteering mind you. I have neither the congintive capacity nor the patience to sit through that tripe. But I figured someone here might want to lay themselves on the altar if necessary.

 

[Obviousman]

Something tells me I won't last much longer over there either. John DOH! wants to exercise his ego again and ban someone. All you have to do is disagree and BINGO! - it becomes "spin" and "BS" and "I'm sick of tolerating this..."

I have to admit, I wonder how a professional pilot has so much time on his hands. At this time, I have nothing to make me believe he is other than what he claims, but his attitude suggests he doesn't play well with others.