SBrown said:Only believable by you. I have a differnce of opinion. My question is that if think the official version is such a strong air tight case, then there is no need to defend people from it.
Come on man...If you think Loose change is so airtight why attack those who show it to be completely wrong? Shouldnt it speak for itself? It is shown to be completely distorted reality...a great fiction and nothing else. Its hard to imagine your here sincerely for a constructive debate after the way you conduct yourself at the LC boards. So many attacks on James Randi (when did he ever quip into this ???) and various accusations of his past and such as if it made Loose Change suddenly more factual?
Regarding a seperate thread debate, though I was pretty pleased to see the seperate thread arise for Legacy and Gravy (despite gravy's reluctance to give them any kind of thread dedication in that manner), It took all of 0 posts for legacy to run. It was actually amazing. Not one arguement. All the rhetoric spewed forth in the LC forums only to have that eventuate was very sad.
I felt pity for the movement.
Like the pity you feel for the opposition of your sports team when they smash another.
None.
