Loose Change - Part III

Status
Not open for further replies.
I never get any hate mail. I am either too nice, or too intimidating.
This really shows the difference between the video crowd and the "literary" crowd. I've only had two emails that I could call nasty, and they certainly weren't threatening. It may also show that MarkyX is reaching the "right" audience.
 
Yep, porno is the way forward for the trooth. Loose Change 111 will be a good, old fashioned porno movie. Get naked for the trooth, Dylan.
 
Why, oh why did it have to be Gypsy?

/Indiana Jones

(when it could've been Jessica Johnstone)
 
Yep, porno is the way forward for the trooth. Loose Change 111 will be a good, old fashioned porno movie. Get naked for the trooth, Dylan.

Well the real truth doesn't work, dazzling people with the BS trooth ain;t working. So dazzle the public with boobies?
 
Well, they lost one of thier first members, Scaffoldrider, over the flag-desecration issue.

..

Something that warms my heart. Having read his stuff from the beginning, he has shown, airplane parts at ground zero, wreckage pix from "outside" the "footprint", and a good amount of eyewitness, to the scene information.

I probably crossed paths with him around gz.

He might be the best to dissuade them of the "look at the thermite melt on that girder" tripe, by explaining the workings of an acetylene torch to them.

I don't think he will like the crowd he's in with soon.
 
That's whistle-blower Gypsy, reminding us once again who the real patriots are. Don't these people have an ounce of self-restraint?

Nope.

Gypsy is a patriot in much the same way that Dylan is a truth seeker. They are the national heros of bizarro-America.

The internet has given the Loosers a stage...but in truth that stage is a gallows and the publicity also provides them lots of free rope.

-z

BTW..."Gorilla autopsy"??? :dl: That guy has gotta be a ninja right?? ;)
 
Well, they lost one of thier first members, Scaffoldrider, over the flag-desecration issue.

This comment almost made me blow coffee out of my nose:

"Nice pics gypsy,
a trim would make your clopper look a bit less like a gorilla autopsy... "

Well, they just propably just learned about the existence of such a thing, seeing as how they probably only know of it from books and porn movies.

"HAIR ????"
 
Well, they lost one of thier first members, Scaffoldrider, over the flag-desecration issue.

This comment almost made me blow coffee out of my nose:

I fervently hope that Dylan Avery isn't setting up a photo shoot for himself right now....

An even better comp would have been to liken it to a Bigfoot autopsy. :)

BTW, Spooked911's experiment with rabbit fencing is getting linked all over the blogosphere this morning.
 
Just Interested in the Truth? Or Defending a Fiefdom?

I found this in a DU post on one of Holmgren's nuttier articles regarding his "no-planes" theory. One of the repliers noted that Holmgren had attacked Stephen Jones in an article here. That article promises much more to come, which was apparently going to be here. Among the items supposed to appear there:

Part 2 Summarized critique of Jones paper

Part 3 What kind of plane is it, Professor Jones ?

Part 4 The muddled thinking of Professor Jones (in preparation )

But something happened. According to Holmgren:

My deconstruction of that attack was highly embarrassing to Jones, and consequently he quickly removed the offending remarks from subsequent drafts of his paper.

However it should be noted that although he removed the offending text, he refused to actually issue a retraction of the remarks, which gives cause for suspicion that he intends to attempt a better thought out recycling of the same attack at a later date.

In spite of my displeasure at his refusal to retract, I have taken down the original article as a peace offering to Professor Jones, considering that he at least removed the remarks from later drafts.

Yep, that's right, Holmgren had this brilliant argument debunking Professor Jones, but he took it down as a quid pro quo for Jones' ceasing to mock the no-planers.

So much for the "Truth".
 
Well, they just propably just learned about the existence of such a thing, seeing as how they probably only know of it from books and porn movies.

"HAIR ????"
That reminds me of the story about the famous Victorian art critic, and notorious prude, John Ruskin. Having viewed the female nude only in its idealized, sanitized form as art, on his wedding night he was convulsed with horror at his wife's pubic hair.

I have no idea if the story is true, but the fact remains that his wife had the marriage annulled for nonconsummation.
 
A Looser Writes His Congressman; and between fits of laughter said Congressman replies:

Roy_Sinister
Posted: Jul 5 2006, 07:32 PM


Regular Member
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 120
Member No.: 1,717
Joined: 3-May 06




The following is the e-mail I recieved today from Earl Pomeroy. I plan a follow-up with a few more sources, but the fact that he looked is a step in the right direction.
More to come.....


Dear Brandon:

Thank you for contacting me regarding the events of September 11th. I appreciate hearing from you.

I understand your interest in Professor Steven E. Jones' paper regarding the events of September 11, 2001. Professor Jones of Brigham Young University (BYU) conjectures that pre-positioned cutter-charges, not planes, were the cause of the destruction of the Twin Towers. As you know, the 9-11 Commission does not agree with this theory and states that fires plus impact damage alone caused the collapse of the buildings.

While there are certainly people who support Professor Jones's hypothesis, BYU has issued the following statement, "Professor Jones's department and college administrators are not convinced that his analyses and hypotheses have been submitted to relevant scientific venues that would ensure rigorous technical peer review. The structural engineering faculty in the Fulton College of Engineering and Technology do not support the hypotheses of Professor Jones." I appreciate your sharing this report with me, and I will be certain to keep it in mind as Congress further evaluates national security issues.

Again, thank you for contacting me. I hope you will stay in touch.

Sincerely,

EARL POMEROY
Member of Congress

EP:KF


Top
Cary
Posted: Jul 5 2006, 07:36 PM


Regular Member
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 113
Member No.: 2,778
Joined: 7-June 06




Well how refreshing. Another asswipe from CONgress following the official story line. LOL

Whereas the Loosers are unrestrained past the point of lunacy; this Congressman exercises what I could only call "monumental" maturity and restraint.

That sure must have been hard to write between guffaws. :)

-z
 
That reminds me of the story about the famous Victorian art critic, and notorious prude, John Ruskin. Having viewed the female nude only in its idealized, sanitized form as art, on his wedding night he was convulsed with horror at his wife's pubic hair.

I have no idea if the story is true, but the fact remains that his wife had the marriage annulled for nonconsummation.
Was Ruskin's disdain for pubic hair caused by his love of classical art, or was it something to do with his obsession with prepubescent girls?
 
Was Ruskin's disdain for pubic hair caused by his love of classical art, or was it something to do with his obsession with prepubescent girls?
I choose "art," because the other way it's creepy, not funny.
 
Speaking of reporting truthers to law enforcement, did anyone catch this in the skeptics forum on LC?

(Captain Moroni @ Jul 3 2006, 06:24 AM)
http://www.theonion.com/content/node/38673

Y'all should be thankful you're just a bunch of nutbars instead of being one of them!


Bush and Co. will join there buddies there shortly!

NesNYC seems to either have balls of steel or brains of lead to be going around threatening the life of POTUS like that.

Any of you live near a Secret Service field office and have 5 minutes to spare for a quick phone call?

EDIT: forgot to add the thread link http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=7363
 
Speaking of reporting truthers to law enforcement, did anyone catch this in the skeptics forum on LC?



NesNYC seems to either have balls of steel or brains of lead to be going around threatening the life of POTUS like that.

Any of you live near a Secret Service field office and have 5 minutes to spare for a quick phone call?

EDIT: forgot to add the thread link http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=7363
Holy crap - that Onion article in that quote is great. I read the Onion all the time - I must have missed that one somehow.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom