Loose Change - Part III

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have the 2004 edition of FS, the century of flight one. I believe it has a 747 available as an option. Not sure if WTC are on the maps still.

Hmm, I wonder what would happen if I flew into the pentagon in the wright flyer?
 
Eerie s***.
I promise you that was on the first try from Dulles where I actually had to do some naviagtion.
Incidentally, my 300 degree swingaround lasted 2 1/2 minutes, just like AA77s did. The only thing different was the angle I hit it, which was dead on. That stands to reason though, a 777 turns a bit wider than a 757.
 
I promise you that was on the first try from Dulles where I actually had to do some naviagtion.
Incidentally, my 300 degree swingaround lasted 2 1/2 minutes, just like AA77s did. The only thing different was the angle I hit it, which was dead on. That stands to reason though, a 777 turns a bit wider than a 757.

would've been hilarious if you put a black dot in the middle of the window.
 
dylan avery @ LC said:
hey, dumbass. i didn't do it. unlike you i have much better things to do with my time.

Not exactly voicing any objections to the censorship his little disciples have implemented. I'm guessing by the end of the week, any posts from skeptics will contain links to universalseed.org. I'm laying odds at 3:2. Any takers?
 
Heh, just saw it. And LondonEye's claim that SLC does the same thing, yet another lie propagated by the TRUTH movement.

I think it's proven by now that any web site or forum or group w/ "truth" in its name is dedicated to spreading lies.

The only time I have removed comments from SLC (the blog; I don't control the forum) is for excessive profanity/abuse (and even there I'll put up with quite a bit), and maybe 5-10 comments which were 50 paragraphs long, off-topic and clearly just cut and pasted from elsewhere. I have never changed a substantive comment that linked to a CT website. I allow BG to thread hijack constantly, mostly because he gives us good ideas for future posts. Heck, we even link to Dylan's crummy video.

BTW, this isn't directed at Wildcat, who clearly knows this. Just wanted to get it on the record.
 
I did a quick web search, according to my findings, 4 australian citizens died in the World Trade Center on 9-11.

Billzilla has all the right in the world to talk about the murders of his countrymen.

They have all the right in the world to talk about anything they want, actually, whether or not they lost people from their country.
 
Edit: post deleted; was looking at the wrong forum over there.
 
Last edited:
The only time I have removed comments from SLC (the blog; I don't control the forum) is for excessive profanity/abuse (and even there I'll put up with quite a bit), and maybe 5-10 comments which were 50 paragraphs long, off-topic and clearly just cut and pasted from elsewhere. I have never changed a substantive comment that linked to a CT website. I allow BG to thread hijack constantly, mostly because he gives us good ideas for future posts. Heck, we even link to Dylan's crummy video.

BTW, this isn't directed at Wildcat, who clearly knows this. Just wanted to get it on the record.

The only ones I have deleted was when insidejob spammed the same overly long rant on about a dozen threads. And that was only after I asked him several times to remove the extras.

I find it amusing that they are complaining that we don't link to their forum. Most of our material is about them. That is all we do is publicize the things they are saying and doing. Why would we prevent people from knowing about their site?
 
They have all the right in the world to talk about anything they want, actually, whether or not they lost people from their country.

This is also true.

When I went looking for the number of Australians lost I was thinking along the lines of the "Cindy Sheehan" type arguments with JDX in mind. He obviously doesn't accept that freedom of speech is nearly unlimited, hence his death threats against Billzilla (the "second amendment" remarks). I figured if he were to understand that Australians were affected by that days events then maybe he would back off on his "you can't discuss 9-11 unless you agree with me if you're not american" garbage...

...but then this IS Johndoex we're talking about.

BTW, is anyone else bothered that JDX smokes pot 5 times a day AND has firearms?
 
I'm guessing the filtering comes from Dylan Avery.

Here he pipes up on the skeptics forum re: gravy's paper:

http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=9154

ah yes, every mainstream article i sourced and eyewitness I used was ********.

brilliant.

don't you guys get tired of being here? you're just wasting your lives.

And then our own realitybites takes the opportunity to pose a question:

I thought the mainstream media was in on it? And why do you only use eyewitnesses that mesh with your story and not the countless others who would disprove it?
 
Abby you made London Eye surrender:

<<Because PM has some officialdom and could be part of the official cover-up, I have removed that filter...>>


Besides, Dylan has more important things to do! (I hope "learn how to use spell check" is one of them.)
 
This is also true.

I figured if he were to understand that Australians were affected by that days events then maybe he would back off on his "you can't discuss 9-11 unless you agree with me if you're not american" garbage...

...but then this IS Johndoex we're talking about.

BTW, is anyone else bothered that JDX smokes pot 5 times a day AND has firearms?

A Conspiracy Theorist would not back off even when threatened with a box-cutter. :D

/Hans
 
The irony is like a punch in the face.

BTW - Is it legal to post someones traceroute info without their knowledge?

I'd guess it's legal, although I'm not sure it's really in the spirit of the terms of use that you have to agree to when you sign up for an account on the Loose Change forum:

Please remember that we are not responsible for any messages posted. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. The messages express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of this BB. Any user who feels that a posted message is objectionable is encouraged to contact us immediately by email. We have the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary. You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this BB to post any material which is knowingly false and/or defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise violative of any law. You agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or by this BB.

They've done a great job enforcing those terms! ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom