Loose Change - Part III

Status
Not open for further replies.
apathoid said:
How does his thermite/thermate account for pulverized concrete anyways? Its an incendiary, correct. So, he thinks explosives were used in addition to Thermate/ite just to pulverize concrete for no apparent reason other than to give a few internet detectives a "smoking gun" to find?
Click to expand...

He seems to have missed a few steps in his test. What happens when you drop the brick 100 times more (once for each floor it hit) each time adding a brick to the load.

He seems to think each floor fell only 12 feet, and the mass (and therefore force) didn't increase as the floors accumulated together.
 
apathoid said:
How does his thermite/thermate account for pulverized concrete anyways? Its an incendiary, correct. So, he thinks explosives were used in addition to Thermate/ite just to pulverize concrete for no apparent reason other than to give a few internet detectives a "smoking gun" to find?
Click to expand...

Cursed whistle blowers! Foiled again!
 
Kent1 said:
He also used a doctored photo once where he (or someone else) cranked up the contrast....then stated how the white blobs were evidence of thermite.
Click to expand...

:jaw-dropp

This guy is a lunatic! It's so obvious that photo has its contrast cranked up!

I didn't even need to see the comparison first... the first photo looked like a high-bit photo that had been degenerated down to a low-bit gif. The contrast was through the roof!

:covereyes when will the madness end?

-Andrew
 
Well, heck, I'm still laughing at Jones' attempt to take a chunk of concrete and claim it was cooled melted steel. There was rebar sticking out of the dang thing!

What's more fun was those CT's who bought it. "Concrete isn't rust colored". :D
 
Hello everyone, my name is John and I'm a regular guy from Connecticut.. I just stumbled across this film on the Net and it contains so much concentrated absurdity, I hardly know where to begin.. but there's one point I just had to bring up here.. the video of the collapse of WTC 7 that purports to show the building falling at "free-fall speed" is truncated.. the CTs start the video about two seconds after the actual collapse began.. there were TWO penthouses atop WTC 7, but in the video they like to show (the one showing the "squibs") one has already collapsed.. you can see the full video at 911myths, which pretty thoroughly debunks many of the Looseniks' arguments... sorry if this site has already been referenced, I know there are literally thousands of posts in this thread... thanks for reading.

John
 
Welcome Jhunter,

If you have a summer off, you can catch up on the three (3!!!) threads here.

Your comment is the first I've heard of that point, and well taken. I similarly (re)found this sight after some one I know sent me to see that idiotic film - the more examination the sillier it becomes.

I stay because I never want to live to see the bilge water presented by the nutters used by the defense in any trial of a genuine bad guy. I don't ever want to see a Jones, or a Fetzer become an "expert" witness.

These idiots are making their career, or gaining their tenure at spineless ivory towers, where "controversy" outweighs scholarship, and brings in $$ to build the University's new sports complex. (Flat earther's and witch burners, and alchemists are passe you know.)

Add some professional malcontents, mix in a bit of anarchist, and give them a ring master in the center ring, call him Dylan Avery, and you have the Circus of Loose Change.
 
Last edited:
The_Fire said:
Christ! Doesn't the idiot know that when you crank up the contrast, you loose details in the bright end of the histogram?! The end result looks like a really badly damaged paperfoto.
Click to expand...
Oh no! I just turned on the thermite detector on my T.V. and that stuff is everywhere!
 
I read a book once upon a time (back in the 90's) entitled "Bad Science" about cold fusion.. and, as I recall, this guy Steven Jones was one of the biggest proponents. So when I saw his name attached to this, I knew to take it with a grain of salt. After reading the criticisms of his "research" here, anything he produces in the future will be taken with a grain of salt the size of my car.
 
jhunter1163 said:
I read a book once upon a time (back in the 90's) entitled "Bad Science" about cold fusion.. and, as I recall, this guy Steven Jones was one of the biggest proponents. So when I saw his name attached to this, I knew to take it with a grain of salt. After reading the criticisms of his "research" here, anything he produces in the future will be taken with a grain of salt the size of my car.
Click to expand...

That's a good book. Jones gets off light compared to Pons and Fleischmann, but he still gets pretty lambasted for his antics.
 
jhunter1163 said:
Hello everyone, my name is John and I'm a regular guy from Connecticut.. I just stumbled across this film on the Net and it contains so much concentrated absurdity, I hardly know where to begin.. but there's one point I just had to bring up here.. the video of the collapse of WTC 7 that purports to show the building falling at "free-fall speed" is truncated.. the CTs start the video about two seconds after the actual collapse began.. there were TWO penthouses atop WTC 7, but in the video they like to show (the one showing the "squibs") one has already collapsed.. you can see the full video at 911myths, which pretty thoroughly debunks many of the Looseniks' arguments... sorry if this site has already been referenced, I know there are literally thousands of posts in this thread... thanks for reading.

John
Click to expand...
Welcome jhunter. Thanks for pointing that out. The Loosers did the same thing with the video of the collapse of the south tower: cut off the first two seconds. They don't edit, they circumcise.
 
kookbreaker said:
That's a good book. Jones gets off light compared to Pons and Fleischmann, but he still gets pretty lambasted for his antics.
Click to expand...

He probably got off light by following standard CT operating procedure: Make your claims vague, tentative, and displaying no intellectual courage.
 
Welcome jhunter,

I think the thing that seperates you and most of us from the current CT crowd is that we read books. We do not rely on the internet for all our information.
 
Ok, jhunter explain this discrepency:

In your first post you say: "I'm a regular guy from Connecticut. . . "

In your 4th post you say:

"that and we do not live in CT Land,"

:confused:

Did you move from Connecticut that fast?????:duck:


Sorry, couldn't help myself!
 
LOL 60hzxtl.. I suppose the conspiracy-minded would take that discrepancy and combine it with my membership in a secret society in eighth grade (we were called the Warlocks, and tried to project the impression of dabbling in the occult when in fact the entire purpose of the organization was to put together enough resources to purchase a extra-large bag of nacho cheese Doritos and a 12-pack of Coke) and turn me into some kind of Communist-sympathizing disinformationist. Although I suppose pooling our resources like that does smack of communism...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom