Loose Change - Part II

Status
Not open for further replies.
chipmunk stew said:
:confused: Why would a spy organization want to hide their identity???
Click to expand...


What? Are you a congressman or something?

It was great when congress acted shocked earlier this year to find out that the spy agencies were actualy, spying.

Now be sure to pick up your paycheck from the spy agency, 'cause it's Friday.
 
Hey Mark - Bravo! You did what I thought would be the quickest turn around on the losers - now catch up on your sleep.

You and Gravy have begun the derailing of "like, hey man Dylan's" 'career'

That and the loser's declaring that they didn't know you had to clear footage before you helped yourself, as if you get to decide what to do with the other guys property.

Bravo Zulu and stand by for Loose Change 3, which at this point might just be a radio show.
 
60hzxtl said:
Bravo Zulu and stand by for Loose Change 3, which at this point might just be a radio show.
Click to expand...

Yeah. I've already seen the first half an hour of LC3. Crazy hyped up guy with coffee in the beginning, a crappy lying "candidate" talking about **** without real evidence, and a geology professor telling me about pentagon's defenses.

I love that bar scene though. Paid actors were involved, or he is trying to get laid. Looking at Dylan in CBS or hearing his voice on the radio, the personality displayed in the bar scene was very Out of Character for Dylan. I would've believed it more if he said "I mean" twenty times within a span of 10 seconds.
 
delphi_ote said:
Getting anything funny from the Loosers yet?
Click to expand...

Sort of. Some of them were bitching about how I kept saying the music was crappy during the video. Others stated that it didn't matter that the engine was wrong, because they were 'both similar'. One person even stated that demolitions go from the top, not from the bottom.

I don't expect the nuts to convert. I expect the mainstream to start asking questions about how viable their 'loose change' source is.

I got a lot of annoyed people on the counter-CT side that I didn't go further; interview experts and so forth. That wasn't the point of this video.
 
Last edited:
MarkyX said:
I expect the mainstream to start asking questions about how viable their 'loose change' source is.
Click to expand...


Which is all that really counts. Every newsroom I've ever been in has cranks that will not get off a subject who write letters, make tapes, etc.

The news rooms keep these cranks at bay, will trot one out on a slow news day, but they know that they are crack pots.

Most of the media, and most of the showcasing of LC has been, not by reporters, but what we call TRANSCRIBERS, they do no research, check no facts, but take dictation and parrot what the subject says. This passes for news, and reporting.

And worse somehow becomes an endorsement of the topic.
 
Last edited:
dubfan said:
Um, unless I'm seriously mistaken, the south tower is not at all visible in this frame, is it? I think they're looking at the NORTH tower and not the south tower, partially obscured by the north, as the OP claims.

http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=5384&view=findpost&p=4974597
Click to expand...
Yea, I just saw that too. I don't understand why they are claiming the "squibs" are comming from the (partially obcured) second tower; the video clearly shows the explosion of the plane crashing to the left with "UA-175 COLPISCE LA 2e TORRE" in big letters (which is italian for "UA-175 hits the second tower").

Can't these people read? It's written right there on the video! Pathetic.
 
60hzxtl said:
Which is all that really counts. Every newsroom I've ever been in has cranks that will not get off a subject who write letters, make tapes, etc.

The news rooms keep these cranks at bay, will trot one out on a slow news day, but they know that they are crack pots.

Most of the media, and most of the showcasing of LC has been, not by reporters, but what we call TRANSCRIBERS, they do no research, check no facts, but take dictation and parrot what the subject says. This passes for news, and reporting.

And worse somehow becomes an endorsement of the topic.
Click to expand...

I didn't exactly mean the media, but the people in general. The 'moderates' of those who believe it.

It would be pretty damn sexy if some big names mention this though. The url isn't THAT hard to memorize ;)
 
MarkyX said:
Sort of. Some of them were bitching about how I kept saying the music was crappy during the video. Others stated that it didn't matter that the engine was wrong, because they were 'both similar'. One person even stated that demolitions go from the top, not from the bottom.

I don't expect the nuts to convert. I expect the mainstream to start asking questions about how viable their 'loose change' source is.
Click to expand...
Of course they won't convert. It's just good to take what entertainment value away that you can. Laughing keeps us sane.
MarkyX said:
I got a lot of annoyed people on the counter-CT side that I didn't go further; interview experts and so forth. That wasn't the point of this video.
Click to expand...
You don't put a video liket his together all by yourself in a week and interview experts!
 
ZouPrime said:
Yea, I just saw that too. I don't understand why they are claiming the "squibs" are comming from the (partially obcured) second tower; the video clearly shows the explosion of the plane crashing to the left with "UA-175 COLPISCE LA 2e TORRE" in big letters (which is italian for "UA-175 hits the second tower").

Can't these people read? It's written right there on the video! Pathetic.
Click to expand...


I think they have something there - the worlds first BLACK smoking squibs!

The response over there is a hoot - Logic - looks like to me - feelings!
 
MarkyX said:
I didn't exactly mean the media, but the people in general. The 'moderates' of those who believe it.

It would be pretty damn sexy if some big names mention this though. The url isn't THAT hard to memorize ;)
Click to expand...


I've been salting it around. . .
 
Any day now....

Pardalis said:
This "world domination plan" is really long in the making isn't it? These Globalists are a patient bunch.
Click to expand...


Yeah, you'd think that with humanity's long history of violence and chaos, these world dominatrixes would have finished the job. They had plenty of chances to do it...the Crusades, the Dark Ages, the Renaissance, the Enlightenment, the American Revolution, the fall of the Bourbons, Napoleon, the Congress of Vienna, the revolutions of 1848, Bismarck, the American Civil War, the Franco-Prussian War, the First World War, the Great Depression, the Second World War, the Cold War, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, Woodstock, Watergate, the Middle East Wars, the rock'n'roller cola wars, and Y2K.

And it hasn't happened. What's the matter with these guys? If 19 guys with boxcutters can knock down the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, why can't a bunch of bankers with more money than Davy Crockett rig the United Nations?
 
60hzxtl said:
I think they have something there - the worlds first BLACK smoking squibs!

The response over there is a hoot - Logic - looks like to me - feelings!
Click to expand...

Yep, funny thing about those squibs. If they were truly bombs in the WTC, the squibs wouldn't be 'slow' and 'flowing' with the building speed. They are a seperate entity, therefore don't react to the speed of other objects (in this case, the building itself). Even the videos they use to show the demolitions show REAL squibs being fast and rapid, not caring about the building's state.
 
A beer with Delphi_ote

delphi_ote said:
If I ever find myself in New Jersey or you ever find yourself in Orlando, I would love to chat with you over a beer.
Click to expand...

I don't drink, but I'll be happy to sip seltzer with you next time my family goes down to Disney World. And if you come up to Newark, I'll give you the 50 cent tour of what used to be the World Trade Center and show you the exhibits in the Police and Fire Department Museums on the subject.

If you want to chat further, drop me an off-line post. Cheers. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom