Filippo Lippi
Philosopher
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2002
- Messages
- 5,364
But, but, a million euros!
I haven't been paying complete attention, so help me catch up, please.
Do the spirits still have this very important message to deliver, a message that will likely save mankind, it being that important, and they speak though the voice of Flaccon's dearly departed dad, but with a foreign accent, and all of Flaccon's family hear the same things that Flaccon hears, except the ones that don't, that being all of them, and the scrappy doesn't understand why his own computer being infected with the spirit virus isn't proof enough of their existence, because otherwise they'd need to do something that actually demonstrated their existence, and, Lord knows, they don't to requests?
Does that about capture it?
Worth a whirl if scrappy/flaccon will agree to a solid protocol.

Pixel I didn't say paredolia is a delusion. Since I discovered the word, of course its perfectly plausible, but doesn't account for accurate and recognisable images of my family members. Also doesn't account for the images that tell a story. It's too uncanny to be paredolia.
There is a psychological phenomenon behind our tendency to see images in arbitrary shapes – a modern term for this is apophenia, but it was first diagnosed by Leonardo da Vinci more than five centuries ago. "If you look at a mottled or stained wall," said Leonardo, "you may start to see landscapes, battles and strange faces."
Good post, to which I for one would really like to see an answer. Unfortunately, even though I shall follow subsequent posts carefully, I'll bet that answer will be there none!Another thing. Why do we see familiar faces - family members, friends, famous people - in random patterns? Because they're familiar. The same is true of aural pareidolia, which is why flaccon hears her own voice and those of her family members.
Scrappy, if your name for the file mentioned above is an accurate reflection of what you think is being said don't you think it's odd that it doesn't make grammatical sense? Time and again I've noticed that the stuff spouted by spirits consists of inane ideas expressed in poorly constructed sentences. Does death have a deleterious effect on the intellect?
Good post, to which I for one would really like to see an answer. Unfortunately, even though I shall follow subsequent posts carefully, I'll bet that answer will be there none!
ETA to change 'will there be' to above. Still not sure if I've got them the right way round!![]()
Ah, thank you! I do like to get the grammar right!So I'd guess the future tense would be, "...answer there will be none."![]()
They are an abomination unto the Lord.
Deut. 18:10-12.
There you go, flaccon.
The Bible says to stop messing about with spirits. Stop it.
So I'd guess the future tense would be, "...answer there will be none."![]()
flaccon seems unable, or unwilling, to accept that thanks to our pattern-seeking brains we hear and see things that are relevant to us. I'm reminded of a believer in the authenticity of the Shroud of Turn who not only saw coins on the image's eyes, he was even able to recognize the king depicted on the coins and discover when they were minted! No wonder flaccon thinks that the images she finds in blood/paint splashes tell a story.
Would Your Grace allow "...answer there'll be none." as a scan more fitting to your thought?
Indeed, Alice Shortcake, if you follow the link given in the OP of our latest TS thread (part I), you'll see some extraordinary examples of pareidolia.
Here's the link.
http://www.missionoftheshroud.com/miracle-photos/miracle-photos.html
So no, it's not a delusion.
I was particularly impressed by the fishing dwarf seen in the TS, myself.
flaccon, any chance of your telling us just what the calibration consists of that you do?