yes, you misread it ---
I understand that.
I was just concerned because I read it like this:
A monitored demonstration, including a person with proper medical expertise present, had been arranged. Mr Randi contacted you with concerns about the demonstration and asked you not to participate - usually he is concerned most when a person's health or wellbeing may be at risk. You then state that the applicant should go ahead and manipulate a man's very deformed spine - without the previously agreed witnesses, so potentially without a medical attendant who would know how much a spine can or cannot be manipulated without harm.
Therefore I think it's ok for me to be a little concerned, but if I misread it, that's fine. Don't wish to derail further.
Where did you read that a medical specialist would be present?
See my post # 31
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=1990682&postcount=31
My presence as a witness was declared to be as a layman; as just someone who happened to live nearby to the person "looking for challenge" and the only reason I provided for wishing to see his paranormal demonstration was to help Mr Pille in his pursuit of affidavits. At first, I had no idea what his "power" was at all, and had not seen his claim.
In posts #8 and #12 of the thread, I indicated that there are doubts as to the veracity of his OP statements, primary among them that he is even an actual Applicant. A little further on, Ririon noted that a certain "Chris Pille" is a Reiki holistic practitioner at a college 10 minutes from my home. This was confirmed as being the very person who is interested in pursuing the JREF Million $$$, as well as other monetary Challenges for demonstrating the paranormal.
Still, no definition of the claimed powers. Several of the forum members tried to get Chris to reveal the claim.
I suggested to Chris, here on the forum, and in a direct eMail, that because I am a JREF Forum participant in good standing and have a loose relationship with other particpants in this geographic area, that we (I) may be able to observe what he is proposing to prove as a paranormal power, and that by our (my) doing so, it could bolster the Application to JREF.
See: Post # 26 of this thread
Only at that point, did Christopher Pille
agree to forward to me all the ongoing correspondence between himself and the JREF Challenge Administrator. He agreed to give me an 'inside look' at his claim, because I provided very specific and detailed assurances:
Read My Post # 31
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=1990682&postcount=31
Specifically, I mention
"It must be emphasized that I am not a representative nor an investigator for the JREF and my only purpose is to act in the capacity of a private skeptical individual who is willing to be shown evidence of the paranormal."
There is nothing at all about any "medical expertise" mentioned -- in fact, I have actually indicated here that I'm a part-time Used Car Salesman (FWIW).
Christopher Pille's verbatim "notarized Application" was part of these eMails I subsequently received (not a scan of an actual document, just the text) and this was the first opportunity I had to see what the 'powers' consisted of.
Now, to the substance of Chillzero's concerns --------
Christopher Pille says he can do what he claims, he indicates that it is a "simple" demonstration, and in his email to me, he's said that it's a method he has imparted successfully on another subject in the past.
I agree that there is a possibility of a forceful physical procedure affecting the alignment of the spinal column causing more harm than good. However, in this case, Christopher has outlined (in his claim Application, which is still in limbo) a procedure involving
no force and he merely will apply his hands gently to different areas of their back.
It's as if he just lets the 'energy' flow and the spine melts into proper shape.
Which is paranormal. Not in the realm of known medical expertise.
And worth the JREF Million, no?
So, let's stand by, and see what protocols are developed, if any.
As I said already:
"How do you propose to 'protect' anyone from seeing the 'wellness expert' of their choice?"