theprestige
Penultimate Amazing
And I think "probably seen eels" is a poorly-supported claim. Precisely because it doesn't look at any specific, documented claims, and try to explain why those claims are more likely to be eels than anything else (or nothing at all).Any of them. It doesn't matter. The point of the OP and the article linked therein is that if someone sees Nessie, they've probably seen eels.
I think it's textbook unreason to say that sightings are "probably eels" without saying which sightings, specifically, you're talking about. We have many examples of specific, documented sightings that are probably not eels.And the point of the rest of the thread is that it might also have been something else. Exactly which purported sighting is eels is utterly beside the point.
I don't think we have even one specific, documented sighting that has been attempted to be explained as more likely eels than anything else.
Let me guess: Probably eels?Meanwhile, the Great Nessie Hunt from the weekend went pretty much as expected:
Nessie hunters hear sounds but fail to record them