You need to think a bit, but, if that doesn't work, you can find out the answer by reading 'The First Holocaust, Jewish Fund Raising Campaigns with Holocaust Claims During World War ONE' by Don Heddesheimer, available on Amazon.
The Jews, as a result of the holohoax, have created a state, have ethnically cleansed Palestine, have extorted trillions in aid from the west in an ongoing scam, and have used the hoax to excuse endless crimes in the middle east.
The Jews have claimed victimhood status in every society they've occupied. There is nothing new about that, but the magnitude and utter depravity of the holohoax is unique, unprecedented.
I think you'll find that every single point asserted above is either flat out wrong or eminently disputable. Let's take them one by one:
The Jews, as a result of the holohoax, have created a state,
This is utterly wrong.
The Jewish community in Palestine was viable well before WWII. The conflicts in Mandate Palestine between Arabs and Jews escalated well before 1939, and continued to bubble under during the war, at a time when Jewish immigration to Palestine was at a near-standstill. Partition had already been recommended before the war, before the Holocaust. The British Mandate holders essentially ignored every piece of news coming out of Europe during and immediately after the war; nothing, not even Nuremberg, made the British more likely to support statehood. So they washed their hands of the whole thing, at which point war broke out in 1948.
have ethnically cleansed Palestine,
this also wasn't the result of the Holocaust, but came about because the Arabs declared war on Israel in 1948. Since the nakbah created the basis for the ongoing Middle Eastern conflict due to Palestinian refugees being driven into Lebanon, Jordan, the Gaza strip, etc (cf 1967, 1973, 1982, 2nd intifada in the 2000s), it's also something which has hardly been ignored.
have extorted trillions in aid from the west in an ongoing scam,
utter rubbish. 'trillions' is a colossal exaggeration. Israel received reparations from West Germany in the 1950s as a one-off. Other compensation payments go to individuals, and are given out irrespective of the ethnic origins of the victim.
US aid to Israel started in the midst of the Cold War with the Soviet Union aiding the Arab states and selling large quantities of arms. It's difficult to see where continuing US support for Israel rests on anything directly to do with the Holocaust, rather than the fact that there are an awful lot of fundamentalist Christians in the US, who like the idea of accelerating the apocalypse by bringing about "Biblical prophecies".
and have used the hoax to excuse endless crimes in the middle east.
this is also utter rubbish. There is widespread criticism of Israel worldwide, especially in Europe, where the EU provides a lot of the funding for the Palestinian Authority. In Europe, the Holocaust is in one box marked 'WWII' and the Middle East conflict is in another box marked 'current affairs'. Israel might like to play on the Holocaust to get sympathy but it's fairly clear that this hasn't worked very well, dating right back to the 1980s, when the 1982 invasion of Lebanon and 1987 intifada was condemned, and through to the 2000s when the second intifada and responses to it provoked considerable condemnation. Of course, you have the peace process in the 1990s in between. That rather buggers up the correlation you want to claim.
The Jews have claimed victimhood status in every society they've occupied.
absolute, utter drivel. Until the 19th Century Jews were at best a separate estate (in Christian countries) or a dhimmi people (in the Ottoman empire), not "victims". They had no say in claiming anything by virtue of their status in pre-modern society. From 1800 onwards Jews strove to claim equal rights and to achieve emancipation, civic equality, and not to be discriminated against on the basis of religion, something which was already overcome in the United States since America was founded on freedom of religion, a very simple concept. In Britain,
Catholics were denied civic equality until the first half of the 19th Century.
Oh, and before you reply with your usual gibberish, pointing out the above facts does not make me a 'Zionist', simply someone committed to factual accuracy who dislikes it when woo-woos lie about things.
you can find out the answer by reading 'The First Holocaust, Jewish Fund Raising Campaigns with Holocaust Claims During World War ONE' by Don Heddesheimer, available on Amazon.
actually it's available free here:
http://holocausthandbooks.com/6/
if anyone bothers to read this piece of tripe, they will realise how shoddy Heddesheimer's research is, how little he knows about the situation of Jews in Eastern Europe after WWI and how incapable he is of parsing easily understood sentences in the English language. In other words, just another woo-woo nutter, like all the other woo-woo nutters we laugh at here.
I honestly have to wonder whether more than 1 in 100,000 people who might encounter Holocaust denier arguments falls for it. They've been around long enough, the books are indeed available on amazon or for free download, and yet around here, the number of deniers remains firmly stuck at six, despite all the efforts to tout dreck like Heddesheimer, Butz and even more appalling nonsense by the likes of Saggy.
