Latest Bigfoot "evidence"

Status
Not open for further replies.
ChrisBFRPKY said:
Hilited:
Another poke at my honesty. Well, I had already guessed this would eventually come into play here. "How do we know you didn't take Cervelo to a different place than the area you frequent when you supposedly encounter bigfoot?"

I'm actually pleased you asked that. I took Cervelo into the exact same area where I filmed the hillside family group video. Since he is an avid outdoors type guy he was able to easily recognize the film area by a specific feature of a tree I pointed out to him. The tree/feature is plainly evident in the video as is the terrain of that exact location. Thereby negating any possibility or suggestion of foul on my part.

This was done mostly for his benefit as I wanted there to be no question in his mind if this was one of my research areas or not. It was and is, he was there and he knows I took him there without a doubt.
Chris B.
Click to expand...

Sorry, but your honesty is suspect. Added to which, what does it really matter? It's not like Cervelo witnessed your pine bark eating bigfeets anyway. So, who cares? I know I don't.
 
Drewbot said:
I would bet a good sum, that anyone who get's involved professionally with Bigfoot, has to tell people he works with, his boss, his family, that he is getting into a field with a lot of bat-guano-crazy people in it, and it may result in whackos calling his office, home, and demanding that he be fired. I'll bet Disotell has had to do that, Desert Yeti probably, Steven Streufert has had threats including shots fired at his store.

It's a field that attracts unstable people.
Click to expand...

To be fair, I've been threatened by a young earth creationist, and stalked by a paranormal enthusiast; plus, these fringe believers sometimes do crossover craziness as well. Better to be anonymous when challenging some of these folks, imo.
 
Gilbert Syndrome said:
Yes, you have lied, it's because you're a bit of a liar, aren't you? You clearly stated that you had footage of various Bigfeet, of all shapes, sizes and colours. You claimed to have shot one from no more than 15 feet away, you claimed that one had "female features," and that these videos would be released to the public "soon," and now, 5 years after "soon," you apparently have no conclusive evidence.

Tell me, where you mistaken in everything you typed in 2010? Were you drunk at the time and forgot to hit 'record?' I can think of no other explanation, other than, y'know, the fact that you're playing pretend.
Click to expand...

Ah, but we're all forgetting that Chris hides behind his ridiculous disclaimer he keeps throwing out there: Only a body will be conclusive proof of bigfoot. Therefore, he gets to say that he has no conclusive evidence of bigfoot--including his up close, HD footage. Because, you know as he has said repeatedly, only a body will count. Anything other than a body doesn't count it seems. So he can claim as much as he wants in that regard and isn't holding back as long as he keeps reminding us that only a body will be conclusive proof, and that he does not have. To release anything less than a body will only fuel the fire for both hoaxers and scofftics.

Maybe someone can explain to me how up close, HD footage would somehow increase our skepticism. I don't understand that one, I'm afraid. Somehow increasing the quality of the evidence, will also increase skepticism.

I know I can honestly say that I'd love to see actual HD footage of an alleged bigfoot. If it's everything Chris indicates, then I'd even be willing to provisionally relax my position on bigfoot quite a bit. Of course, this will not happen. And to be clear, Chris, I do not consider the PGF an example of close, HD footage. I'm talking HD footage of the quality I can see at any given time on Nat Geo or BBC documentaries. If you toss up that tired old canard that what is the point of releasing your footage when people constantly dismiss the PGF, then I would be forced to seriously doubt that you have any clue what HD means.
 
Last edited:
ChrisBFRPKY said:
Yes, we've met and as before, you're still welcome to view what I have based on our agreement. I will not make screen caps for distribution over the internet though. You are welcome to view what I have on my laptop as offered before, but I am unwilling to upload anything to the internet due to security issues. (Someone has already hacked my website root directory searching for video files)

I am a bit concerned with your understanding of the NDA though. Non-disclosure doesn't mean it's ok to discuss what you've seen. You are only allowed to do so after I've completed my studies. So it's kinda improper to offer a devil's advocate position to your fellow skeptics.

Another concern is item 4. of the agreement, You did not get back with me to share any findings during your time in the area. Though, I did read your post here somewhere that you heard some sort of scream at some point during your time here, you have yet to share with me privately the details/location etc.

Of course not every scream can be attributed to Bigfoot activity, but I should have been made aware of the details privately so I can compare the location with other data. You haven't done that. I'm not complaining, I'm reminding you to see item 4.

It seems to be the opinion of a few here I am withholding some super duper proof Bigfoot exists. Despite my many clarifications that this is not the case. I have agreed to share everything I've collected when the time comes and I have the missing pieces. I do not wish to share every detail of my study while I'm still working on it. Those skeptics who are uneasy in their position on Bigfoot can rest easy knowing I do not have anything more conclusive than what I've already released from 2010. I'll wait for a body or part to rub their noses in, undeniable biological proof is what's required.
Chris B.
Click to expand...

OMG I guess I better go review that NDA!!!!
I didn't realize I signed a contract given you all rights to my vacation memories?
But no biggie I'll get right on that confidential report!
I've got one problem, I've lost my BFF (Bigfoot Fantasy w/Friends) decoder ring so it won't be in super secret code, is that OK?
Well folks I might be in violation of my NDA, (since this was taken on planet earth) but in the name of science I'm going to release this photo of Bigfoot that I took on my vacation after meeting with Chris.
Which undoubtedly is the reason I got so lucky in snagging this pic, your the best Chris!!
 
Wow. I can even see tendons and muscle movement! Has Munns seen this??

Based on the ground near its feet, it looks like this poor bigfoot is suffering from a nasty case of the Green Apple Splatters. Maybe that is why he doesn't really look friendly.
 
I think he was just really happy, it's a well establish greeting amoung the Bigfeets.
Opps that might have been another violation of my NDA.
 
Last edited:
dmaker said:
Wow. I can even see tendons and muscle movement! Has Munns seen this??

Based on the ground near its feet, it looks like this poor bigfoot is suffering from a nasty case of the Green Apple Splatters. Maybe that is why he doesn't really look friendly.
Click to expand...

How about those opposable thumbs? Finally, a confirmation. Dexterity enough not only to throw a Good-N-Plenty, but to pluck one from a box if need be.
 
OMG! He seems to have a Good-N-Plenty shaped object in his right hand! Finally! Vindication for NL. He must be so proud.



Bigfoot research is fun, and rewarding!
 
It's obviously taken its toll on his teeth. Maybe an out reach program for dentally challenged bigfeet is in order, certainly there's a similar program in Kentucky already in place.
 
It is strongly recommended that the conversation return to the topic at hand. Any more accusations of lying without new supporting evidence will be seen as a violation of Rule 12. It's fine to point out dishonesty with evidence, but when it becomes the main focus of a thread it slips into an ad hominem attack.

As always, keep it civil and on topic. The topic isn't the other posters.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Kmortis
 
Chris - you got me - I've been telling a fib, I'm not really a Ninja.....I'm a ZEN-NINJA.

Trust me, keeping your secret bigfoot location secret is a waste of time. Nobody is going to come steal bigfoot away from you.
 
If there are many bigfoot in the supposed habitat, then all of the locals already know about them, and they have told all their friends already. So, lots of people already know the secret.

You cannot keep a troop of giant primates a secret.

There are too many people in the woods, for recreation, and for many different jobs, and all of them have a good camera with them.
 
There's plenty of bigfoot evidence, it's just in the opposite of the hypothesis.
 
dmaker said:
Sorry, but your honesty is suspect. Added to which, what does it really matter? It's not like Cervelo witnessed your pine bark eating bigfeets anyway. So, who cares? I know I don't.
Click to expand...

The question of whether or not I took cervelo to one of my research areas or not was asked and answered. Like everything else, it is factual regardless what you choose to believe. Chris B.
 
Cervelo said:
OMG I guess I better go review that NDA!!!!
I didn't realize I signed a contract given you all rights to my vacation memories?
But no biggie I'll get right on that confidential report!
I've got one problem, I've lost my BFF (Bigfoot Fantasy w/Friends) decoder ring so it won't be in super secret code, is that OK?
Well folks I might be in violation of my NDA, (since this was taken on planet earth) but in the name of science I'm going to release this photo of Bigfoot that I took on my vacation after meeting with Chris.
Which undoubtedly is the reason I got so lucky in snagging this pic, your the best Chris!!
[qimg]http://i796.photobucket.com/albums/yy242/RCM944/226D958F-157B-4731-92A5-6BCFF9C1264A.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...
The NDA was/is a standard agreement to protect the integrity of the site and ongoing research. It's not some lengthy document full of twists, tricks or odd requirements. Basically, you are free to keep any evidence you find while in the area but you are expected to coordinate your efforts and also share with me any findings and to not release them until after my study is complete. You are also free to discuss any sightings but the location description shall be limited to using "in Kentucky" with no further location description.

Obviously, the pics you made while in town are not part of the agreement. Only the visited or unvisited research sites within South Central KY are outlined within the agreement in item 1.

You don't need a decoder ring to contact me, an email as before is fine.

I've taken you to one specific area, the "Hillside video" location and beyond that to another location where I regularly search for tracks. You know why I go there. I made sure you were able to identify the "Hillside video" film location so there would be no question in your mind of any foul on my part. I've revealed information to you that is private after you accepted the NDA. Obviously it may seem ridiculous to a skeptic, but with that information comes specific responsibility.
Chris B.
 
So the NDA is binding with regards to the location, but it can't be binding to his general memories and recollections of the day.

For example: If he said; we pulled up to the parking spot, walked to the location, Chris showed me some comparison photos so I could get my bearings, showed me where the alleged beast was, and then we proceeded to not find any evidence of such a creature.

That would not be covered by any NDA, for an NDA to be enforceable, the party has to be able to show damage caused by the breaking of the NDA.

If it is public land, your NDA is not enforceable. If it is private land, but is not your land, the NDA is not enforceable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom