Latest Bigfoot "evidence"

Status
Not open for further replies.
JUDGE: So you took this guy to your land, and he told everyone on the internet where it was?

BIGFOOTER: Well it's not MY land per se.

JUDGE: Who's land is it?

BIGFOOTER: Well it's public land sir, but I don't want Bigfooters showing up and messing up my area.

JUDGE: Son, have you ever heard this song?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxiMrvDbq3s
 
The Shrike said:
^Exactly what I was thinking, Drew.

Chris, who owns the land where your bigfoots gambol about?
Click to expand...

His bio says that his parents purchased land that was habituated by bigfoot.

Then in 1980 his interest in the subject peaked when his family purchased and moved to a farm in rural KY that by chance happened to be on a migration/gathering path for the creatures. Since then, Chris and the BFRP have collected multiple sighting reports, screams, Photos, Film Footage and both large and small bipedal footprint info.
Click to expand...

What are the odds that he is now talking about a different tract of land in Ky that is also a bigfoot migration and gathering area?

As I said before, it can't be too hard to find that property with a records search if one wanted to, but who wants to?

Knowing how amazing Chris is with bigfoot, he will probably say that he found a second migration path and gathering area in KY.

Meaning that KY must be chock full of gathering and migrating giant hairy apes, still undiscovered by the modern world.
 
This thread sometimes reminds me of a thread in the Religion section where a poster repeatedly describes what will happen in the near future when his interpretations of the predictions of the bible will all be fulfilled and all of those who scoffed at him will be humbled and become believers. Despite his demonstrably failed attempts at prophesy in the past.

Here, in this thread, we have posters who claim that definitive proof of Bigfoot will happen in the near future and the rest of us will be humbled abd become true believers, despite the failures to provide such proof so far. Despite the fact that some of the "weaker" evidence presented thus far for Bigfoot is, in fact, pretty strong evidence against Bigfoot.

So in both cases, I have taken the position: great, truly I'll wait for these predicted future events- no problem. I will be truly surprised and humbled, as wished, in either case. But don't expect me to spend a lot of my time listening to you much until then.
 
Giordano said:
{snip}
Here, in this thread, we have posters who claim that definitive proof of Bigfoot will happen in the near future and the rest of us will be humbled abd become true believers, despite the failures to provide such proof so far.
{snip}
Click to expand...
Most, if not all, of us would be thrilled to be proven wrong and will be glad to be humbled when someone finds a bigfoot. No matter how many times we explain that to the 'footers they still don't get it.
 
GT/CS said:
Most, if not all, of us would be thrilled to be proven wrong and will be glad to be humbled when someone finds a bigfoot. No matter how many times we explain that to the 'footers they still don't get it.
Click to expand...

Footie doesn't thrill me all that much; now a relict T-Rex, that would jazz me. Show me a bigfoot and of course I'll admit I was wrong about it, but I was still correct to be skeptical, given the state of the evidence.
 
GT/CS said:
Most, if not all, of us would be thrilled to be proven wrong and will be glad to be humbled when someone finds a bigfoot. No matter how many times we explain that to the 'footers they still don't get it.
Click to expand...

I would be very intrigued if Bigfoot is proven (and I don't really mind being "humbled." I think it is a good thing in general). I love thinking about unusual animals in general, and about unexpected discoveries of these types of animals in general. The Coelacanth story is a wonderful one for me. What I don't like is to be teased by a promise, and then disappointed by the actual facts.
 
The things you can learn by just having an open mind.
http://www.sunstar-solutions.com/BFgeological.htm

Certainly ones life changes dramatically after seeing such a creature! Many many cases wind up with the witness(es) suddenly delving into research or asking questions or even joining a Bigfoot research type organization (such as I did) due to hearing, smelling or seeing one of these large hairy beings . . .
So what are the signs that we must watch for if we are to look beyond the realms of just the Underworld (physical), the Middle Urth (mental), and the Upper World (spiritual) and to the real meaning that encapsulates ALL of these Unified Worlds? How does all of this point to geologic changes? Let us cover the basics of bigfoot sightings briefly here.... and remember that in order to see a bigger picture we must realize that there is no such thing as coincidence!
Click to expand...
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
The NDA was/is a standard agreement to protect the integrity of the site and ongoing research. It's not some lengthy document full of twists, tricks or odd requirements. Basically, you are free to keep any evidence you find while in the area but you are expected to coordinate your efforts and also share with me any findings and to not release them until after my study is complete. You are also free to discuss any sightings but the location description shall be limited to using "in Kentucky" with no further location description.

Obviously, the pics you made while in town are not part of the agreement. Only the visited or unvisited research sites within South Central KY are outlined within the agreement in item 1.

You don't need a decoder ring to contact me, an email as before is fine.

I've taken you to one specific area, the "Hillside video" location and beyond that to another location where I regularly search for tracks. You know why I go there. I made sure you were able to identify the "Hillside video" film location so there would be no question in your mind of any foul on my part. I've revealed information to you that is private after you accepted the NDA. Obviously it may seem ridiculous to a skeptic, but with that information comes specific responsibility.
Chris B.
Click to expand...

You've got to be kidding me....to think that "exposing" the hillside location would compromise your study is laughable. It was a great hike and I do appreciate your time and company.
That area might as well be downtown Manhattan....bottom line to much traffic and to many hunters..this mystery would have been solved long ago if biggie was in that area.
Your secret spot is safe with me and the untold numbers that visit every year as well as live, hunt and fish that area.
 
Cervelo said:
You've got to be kidding me....to think that "exposing" the hillside location would compromise your study is laughable. It was a great hike and I do appreciate your time and company.
That area might as well be downtown Manhattan....bottom line to much traffic and to many hunters..this mystery would have been solved long ago if biggie was in that area.
Your secret spot is safe with me and the untold numbers that visit every year as well as live, hunt and fish that area.
Click to expand...

I expect that is the real reason for keeping the location secret.
 
I'm not sure the family we saw walking in as we were walking out will keep the Bigfoot hotspot a secret ;)
Oh yeah....in Kentucky
 
Last edited:
Cervelo said:
I'm not sure the family we saw walking in as we were walking out will keep the Bigfoot hotspot a secret ;)
Oh yeah....in Kentucky
Click to expand...

Yeah, the secret is probably that it's an area where bigfoot families couldn't possibly hide, like a state or national park, or recreation area. A place where there are many people in the area, and many people living and driving nearby.

Thus making it a very unlikely place for a troop of sasquatch to hang out unnoticed.
 
Last edited:
Ever since Melba Ketchum revealed that she was getting people to sign NDAs, Bigfooters have been following her lead and making NDAs of their own for people to sign. IMO, it's just an act to make something that isn't legit seem legit.
 
Cervelo said:
I'm not sure the family we saw walking in as we were walking out will keep the Bigfoot hotspot a secret ;)
Oh yeah....in Kentucky
Click to expand...

LTC8K6 said:
Yeah, the secret is probably that it's an area where bigfoot families couldn't possibly hide, like a state or national park, or recreation area. A place where there are many people in the area, and many people living and driving nearby.

Thus making it a very unlikely place for a troop of sasquatch to hang out unnoticed.
Click to expand...
Would you say you came to this conclusion based on the fact cervelo has used another descriptor besides or in addition to "in Kentucky"? Chris B.
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
Would you say you came to this conclusion based on the fact cervelo has used another descriptor besides or in addition to "in Kentucky"? Chris B.
Click to expand...

What conclusion?

I have suspected the reason for your NDA for a long time.

This is not the only thread where your claims have been discussed.

But now I'm tired of them.
 
Last edited:
LTC8K6 said:
What conclusion?

I have suspected the reason for your NDA for a long time.

This is not the only thread where your claims have been discussed.
Click to expand...

I was referring to post #2355 specifically, the one in which you quoted cervelo's post for your response. You made that post based on another thread?
Chris B.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom