Latest Bigfoot "evidence"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Gilbert Syndrome said:
"There will also be at least 3 videos upcoming for release to the public. Videos are currently under review by Scientific professionals with an interest in Bigfoot/Sasquatch. The videos will show multiple creatures, a family group, many different sizes and colors. Release date will be decided after all reviews of the material are complete. More than likely, the info of what will be released will be announced in the near future..."

It seems you have a forgetful nature, not to mention a deceitful one. Am I not Joe Public enough for you? Why hasn't that amazing footage been released yet? Why can't you at least show us the pictures of your female Bigfoot, y'know, the one that you made a big deal over because it had breasts just like Roger's? You're chatting bollocks again, son.
Click to expand...


Yes, he lied about having any of that. He's admitted to in this very thread:

ChrisBFRPKY said:
Those skeptics who are uneasy in their position on Bigfoot can rest easy knowing I do not have anything more conclusive than what I've already released from 2010
Click to expand...
 
AdMan said:
Yes, he lied about having any of that. He's admitted to in this very thread:
Click to expand...

Exactly. I just wonder how HD footage, some from 15 feet away, of a living, breathing Sasquatch, couldn't possibly be conclusive. How do 3 videos of Bigfoot of varying sizes and colours, at least one with breasts, not amount to anything "conclusive?"

Did Chris dream up all of the evidence he thought he had, and then those 3 Super Secret Scientists viewed the actual stuff he had and broke the news that he must've been asleep?

In Ranier Wolfcastle's voice:

"Upon closer inspection, it appears that these HD videos aren't conclusive."
 
AdMan said:
Yes, he lied about having any of that. He's admitted to in this very thread:
Click to expand...

Did I? I don't recall saying that I had lied about anything. What I said was something to the effect that I do not have anything that would be considered conclusive proof of Bigfoot's existence, released or unreleased from 2010. You know, no smoking gun.

If you do not believe I have unreleased evidence as outlined above from the email releasing that pic, that's fine. Accusing me of lying is not gonna get you any closer to seeing anything I haven't already released. It's private and simply not up for review. Chris B.
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
Did I? I don't recall saying that I had lied about anything. What I said was something to the effect that I do not have anything that would be considered conclusive proof of Bigfoot's existence, released or unreleased from 2010. You know, no smoking gun.

If you do not believe I have unreleased evidence as outlined above from the email releasing that pic, that's fine. Accusing me of lying is not gonna get you any closer to seeing anything I haven't already released. It's private and simply not up for review. Chris B.
Click to expand...

Yes, you have lied, it's because you're a bit of a liar, aren't you? You clearly stated that you had footage of various Bigfeet, of all shapes, sizes and colours. You claimed to have shot one from no more than 15 feet away, you claimed that one had "female features," and that these videos would be released to the public "soon," and now, 5 years after "soon," you apparently have no conclusive evidence.

Tell me, where you mistaken in everything you typed in 2010? Were you drunk at the time and forgot to hit 'record?' I can think of no other explanation, other than, y'know, the fact that you're playing pretend.
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
Did I? I don't recall saying that I had lied about anything. What I said was something to the effect that I do not have anything that would be considered conclusive proof of Bigfoot's existence, released or unreleased from 2010. You know, no smoking gun.

If you do not believe I have unreleased evidence as outlined above from the email releasing that pic, that's fine. Accusing me of lying is not gonna get you any closer to seeing anything I haven't already released. It's private and simply not up for review. Chris B.
Click to expand...

So you just lied when you said you had nothing more conclusive and you actually do?

You were either lying when you claimed to have all those materials you wrote about, or you're lying now, saying you have nothing more conclusive than what you've already presented, which has been nothing more than fuzzy photographs of vegetation. (And I think we all know which one was a lie.)

Either way, you've demonstrated you're willing to be dishonest about the subject. Nobody can really take you seriously. Just ask your science friends who've been working on your stuff for five years.
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
Accusing me of lying is not gonna get you any closer to seeing anything I haven't already released.
Click to expand...


By the way, I find it quite funny that you tell people who call you out on your dishonesty that this won't make you release anything new or more conclusive when we already know you have nothing better (and of course you've also admitted to that). Just who do you think you're talking to? Did you forget where you are? I don't think anybody here believes you're withholding anything of value.
 
Last edited:
Gilbert Syndrome said:
... videos would be released to the public "soon," and now, 5 years after "soon," you apparently have no conclusive evidence.
Click to expand...


Well there is soon, and then there is soon:

Then Jesus told his disciples:

...........I say to you, there are some standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom.”
Click to expand...

Give Chris a couple of thousand years, you impatient scofftics.
 
LTC8K6 said:
How do we know that your bigfoot gathering area and migration route isn't a ridiculous area for that?

How do we know that you didn't take Cervelo to a different place than the area you frequent when you supposedly encounter bigfoot?
Click to expand...

Hilited:
Another poke at my honesty. Well, I had already guessed this would eventually come into play here. "How do we know you didn't take Cervelo to a different place than the area you frequent when you supposedly encounter bigfoot?"

I'm actually pleased you asked that. I took Cervelo into the exact same area where I filmed the hillside family group video. Since he is an avid outdoors type guy he was able to easily recognize the film area by a specific feature of a tree I pointed out to him. The tree/feature is plainly evident in the video as is the terrain of that exact location. Thereby negating any possibility or suggestion of foul on my part.

This was done mostly for his benefit as I wanted there to be no question in his mind if this was one of my research areas or not. It was and is, he was there and he knows I took him there without a doubt.
Chris B.
 
I have no problem questioning your honesty, Chris. I don't think you're honest at all. I think your claims are made up. You are unable to even begin to support your claims, you just expect faith.

I don't even think you believe what you say, it's just a part you play in a show called bigfoot.
 
Anybody who really believed bigfoot was in their woods, and could prove it, would quickly get a local university and the state involved, to get the creatures studied and protected.

Any actual HD video from 15 feet away would certainly get the university involved.

So there's no way Chris is real, regarding bigfoot. He's counterfeit, imo.
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
I've shared/released everything I intended to. Is there some need to keep quoting an email from 2010 I sent releasing that pic?
Click to expand...


I'd say it's worth bringing up as a reminder of your credibility and your lack of honesty, particularly now that you've admitted that you in fact have nothing better than what you released in 2010.
 
LTC8K6 said:
IMO, there is no way any adult really believed that they could see a bigfoot family on this hillside.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAcA8Ztta0I
Click to expand...

I see trees, leaves and a blackish blob thing in the centre which in all likelyhood is a tree stump or something else mundane. Chris you might as well just tell us a dragon, 5 unicorns and a tribe of Kentucky holidaying gnomes are also in the picture and it would be about as convincing.
 
Playing the victim card now, as predicted.

Oh, the bold lonely crusader fighting against the evil system!
 
Correa Neto said:
Playing the victim card now, as predicted.

Oh, the bold lonely crusader fighting against the evil system!
Click to expand...

Many think they are blazing a new trail when they are actually hopelessly lost in the woods.
 
philkensebben said:
I see trees, leaves and a blackish blob thing in the centre which in all likelyhood is a tree stump or something else mundane. Chris you might as well just tell us a dragon, 5 unicorns and a tribe of Kentucky holidaying gnomes are also in the picture and it would be about as convincing.
Click to expand...

He never even goes up the hill to see what it might be, if anything.

Never even expresses any interest in doing so.

He never yells to see if it moves.

He never moves to the left or right to film it from a different angle.

No effort at all is made to determine what it might be. It's completely ridiculous, imo.

Likely never went to the spot to see the tracks, either.

It's just 15 seconds of a camera pointed at a hillside.

I'm sure he will claim that it or they walked off and he recorded it, but we will never see that video, so why should we believe him?

The reason no effort is made to identify it is because the idea of claiming bigfoot was in the video probably came after the video was shot and it was revealed that you couldn't really tell what was in the video at all, just a dark area. The zoom with that camera pretty much ensures no recognizable images.

It's the same chicanery we often see with bigfooters.

They know exactly what they are doing...
 
Last edited:
Chris suffers from the same bigfooter disease I have mentioned many times before. Claim to get very close to bigfoot, and then don't follow up. Make no effort to finish the job. Over and over again.
 
The Shrike said:
As for anonymity on the Internets Chris, Bigfoot skeptics frequently make statements that raise the ire of people who are bat-crap crazy and/or highly unscrupulous. I prefer whatever veil of anonymity I can maintain between such people and my family.
Click to expand...

I would bet a good sum, that anyone who get's involved professionally with Bigfoot, has to tell people he works with, his boss, his family, that he is getting into a field with a lot of bat-guano-crazy people in it, and it may result in whackos calling his office, home, and demanding that he be fired. I'll bet Disotell has had to do that, Desert Yeti probably, Steven Streufert has had threats including shots fired at his store.

It's a field that attracts unstable people.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom