• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Latest Bigfoot "evidence"

Status
Not open for further replies.
...*The real problem though is that Chris again contradicts himself with his own imagination. He claims at once that the bigfoots aren't spending enough time around the trees to leave any hairs behind but then claims that the bigfoots are climbing those very trees.

*So we're now up to 5 trackways, one at least 1.5 miles long, some prints impressed 2" deep (but no one is allowed to see them), and Flying Wallenda bigfoots taking to the canopy when they think that the great white hunter might be hot on their trail. Have I got that right, Chris?
:D Sometimes when you make **** up as you go along, like when BLAARGing, you forget what you've said and you get an OOPS moment, and such is the case here. And it's not even the first case. The "trees" have been used by him numerous times and in whatever need they can serve him at the moment. Like when he got those blurry pictures of those blurry trees.

It's perfectly fine if you think I don't have pics of tracks and trackways.
I am unwilling to share them for good reason. Don't feed the hoaxers. Of course you will not like that stance but I can live with it regardless. I won't be goaded into sharing something that only benefits hoaxers. Call me what you will, think what you will, but it won't change anything and I'll not apologize for it. Chris B.
If you "believe", I'm not following your logic. Bigfoot LIVES, you KNOW it does, nobody can take that away from you according to you, and you're even on the path to finding poop that says so...YET your biggest concern is to "don't feed the hoaxers"? Feed them what exactly? Or is this more a case of "you judge as you live"? You can admit it, we know.

How would one go about being more social? Move to Alaska?
Try looking up "psychological projection" in some of those texts you study.
Chris B.
So funny, you don't "get" for a second what he was saying to you. And that's giving you the benefit of the doubt. If you really do know exactly what he said and just pretend to be this obtuse, you're an even worse person than he's been so far very fair in describing.

...That will not work in my case. We can either have an adult conversation and I know you are capable of having one, or we can throw down. I'm up for either.
Chris B.
Really? I beg to differ, you're not up for either one. :eye-poppi
 
Here's a reference to tree bending, and here's a video.

RayG

3 to 4 inches in diameter (or larger depending on your weight)

I want to see a demonstration of that. Particularly larger.

I also want to see a demonstration of how riding a short tree helps at all with hiding your trail.

Even if it's 30 feet tall, when bent to the ground, you aren't very far away from the trunk.

Plus, if you let go and drop to the ground, you just made some very obvious tracks.

Plus plus, if we know you are "tree riding" to hide your trail, then it renders the "tree riding" useless, because we know how to track you.
 
Tapping the tree by tree riding is simply a way to leave a cold trail and start fresh again.
It has nothing to do with normal locomotion means and will likely only occur at the end of a hot trail, not during it. Chris B.


But, why does Bigfoot feel the need to leave a "cold trail"?
 
OK Chris. I've got a deal to make with you. If I post up my "proof" of what I claimed, will you post up your proof of claims as well? I can show you "HD video footage" of my claims, and however many photos you need as proof.

All you need to do is post up your HD video "from 15'" and saliva sample results, along with any other documentation you may have of this "family group" you witnessed, and pine bark eating, you know... the "extraordinary claims" you've made in the threads here.

Stompers exist, even mine. Bigfoot, not so much!

How about it Chris, lets put up or shut up. Post up, and I'll post up right after you. "I'm down" as you said earlier in the thread.

You've already seen some of my pics, I've yet to see ANY of yours.

Chris B.
 
Last edited:
You've already seen some of my pics, I've yet to see ANY of yours.
So as you often like to say "Put up or shut up".
Chris B.

Right, and i posted pics of one of my ACTUAL stompers (you can clearly make out what it is! its not blurry, or pareidolia! lol) while it was being made in my posts. No one has seen any evidence of "bigfoot" as you have claimed so many times you have. I've given you a challenge and I'll post up HD video of the stompers and photos of the prints and of the stompers. Don't cop out now Chris, lets do this!
 
Last edited:
Again you seem confused....let me help you :)
You have made many claims from HD vid, pics of tracks, sightings, DNA and recent conjecture in regards to Bigfoot behavior in a thread titled Bigfoot evidence.
You have not supported your claims in anyway...just back up what your saying with supporting evidence or not...if not...maybe start your own thread along the lines of "Chris's Bigfoot Conjecture Corner" or get used to being called out everytime you post such nonsense in this thread :)

Well, to be more correct, I didn't make those HD video claims here, I answered the questions of whether I had them or not.

I don't seem to remember claiming to have Bigfoot DNA, are you possibly making something up again? I think you are.......
Chris B.
 
:D Sometimes when you make **** up as you go along, like when BLAARGing, you forget what you've said and you get an OOPS moment, and such is the case here. And it's not even the first case. The "trees" have been used by him numerous times and in whatever need they can serve him at the moment. Like when he got those blurry pictures of those blurry trees.


If you "believe", I'm not following your logic. Bigfoot LIVES, you KNOW it does, nobody can take that away from you according to you, and you're even on the path to finding poop that says so...YET your biggest concern is to "don't feed the hoaxers"? Feed them what exactly? Or is this more a case of "you judge as you live"? You can admit it, we know.


So funny, you don't "get" for a second what he was saying to you. And that's giving you the benefit of the doubt. If you really do know exactly what he said and just pretend to be this obtuse, you're an even worse person than he's been so far very fair in describing.


Really? I beg to differ, you're not up for either one. :eye-poppi

Harry, at what point did you decide to join the Bigfooter Basher cult here? I remember a time when you were almost a pleasant poster. For some time now I've noticed you have this deep seated resentment of Bigfooters. Did something drive you to this or were you always this way and just acting before?

At one point I thought you may even be an enlightened individual. But now I think you'd probably disagree that the Sun rises in the East. The Sun always rises in the East Harry.

Sure, I've returned insult and I shouldn't have. Sometimes weakness gets the best of me. I've turned the other cheek until both are red though. I'll try to do better.
Chris B.
 
Right, and i posted pics of one of my ACTUAL stompers while it was being made in my posts. No one has seen any evidence of "bigfoot" as you have claimed so many times you have. I've given you a challenge and I'll post up HD video of the stompers and photos of the prints and of the stompers. Don't cop out now Chris, lets do this!

The pics I saw that you posted previously were from the internet River.
That's ok, I withdraw my request. You don't need post anything for my benefit.
You already know I'm not going to show you detailed pics of a good track.
Chris B.
 
But now I think you'd probably disagree that the Sun rises in the East. The Sun always rises in the East Harry.

Actually I have a ton of photos, high definition too, of this phenomenon. I can predict it very accurately to the second, and assuming it is clear, actually show it to you tomorrow if you wish. I can show you reproducible observations in scientific books by thousands of different people who all agree on the precise details. People have even navigated ships and boats across oceans to small islands based on this phenomenon.

Whereas Bigfoot...
 
I want to see a demonstration of that. Particularly larger.

I also want to see a demonstration of how riding a short tree helps at all with hiding your trail.

Even if it's 30 feet tall, when bent to the ground, you aren't very far away from the trunk.

Plus, if you let go and drop to the ground, you just made some very obvious tracks.

Plus plus, if we know you are "tree riding" to hide your trail, then it renders the "tree riding" useless, because we know how to track you.

Yes it does render that trick useless now. That's why I posted it. I'm betting I'm not the first one to lose a trail because of this before. Maybe it'll help the next guy.
Chris B.
 
Harry, at what point did you decide to join the Bigfooter Basher cult here? I remember a time when you were almost a pleasant poster. For some time now I've noticed you have this deep seated resentment of Bigfooters. Did something drive you to this or were you always this way and just acting before?

At one point I thought you may even be an enlightened individual. But now I think you'd probably disagree that the Sun rises in the East. The Sun always rises in the East Harry.

Sure, I've returned insult and I shouldn't have. Sometimes weakness gets the best of me. I've turned the other cheek until both are red though. I'll try to do better.
Chris B.

You know if Bigfoot would turn the other cheek maybe you would be able to get that imaginary poop you are after easier...just saying.
 
The pics I saw that you posted previously were from the internet River.
That's ok, I withdraw my request. You don't need post anything for my benefit.
You already know I'm not going to show you detailed pics of a good track.
Chris B.


Oh, I already knew you would reject anything that requires you to show your proof, but here you go. The "actual thread" with "clear photos" of one of my stompers during the process of being made. You can clearly make out what is in the photo. It doesn't require pareidolia glasses.

I'm still down to post up some prints and HD footage, lets do this Chris!!!

Anyhow, Like I've said previously many times. Your HD video of bigfoot doesnt exist and you love to tell stories. You "called someone" on proof of things that actually exist, when you're not willing to offer anything you claim to have in your possession about things that don't exist. You could be a rich guy Chris!!! You must be pretty special to hold on to that stuff without letting anyone see it. Bigfoot senses it too. Thats why he allows you to see him.

lol?

Seriously though, if I didn't think you were playing games, I'd recommend you speak to a professional/doctor about these bigfoot creatures you are seeing, and show them your "HD video from 15'" and see if they agree with you on what it is a video of. Seeing mythical creatures eating pine bark like cotton candy and your other claims are a real concern to me if you're going out in public parks packing large and seeing these visions while out there.
 
Last edited:
The pics I saw that you posted previously were from the internet River.
That's ok, I withdraw my request. You don't need post anything for my benefit.
You already know I'm not going to show you detailed pics of a good track.
Chris B.

We knew that you went going to post anything long ago. The pot is still very empty, use it or vacate it.
 
Harry, at what point did you decide to join the Bigfooter Basher cult here? I remember a time when you were almost a pleasant poster. For some time now I've noticed you have this deep seated resentment of Bigfooters. Did something drive you to this or were you always this way and just acting before?

At one point I thought you may even be an enlightened individual. But now I think you'd probably disagree that the Sun rises in the East. The Sun always rises in the East Harry.

Sure, I've returned insult and I shouldn't have. Sometimes weakness gets the best of me. I've turned the other cheek until both are red though. I'll try to do better.
Chris B.

No one has deep seated resentment because as has been told to you no one gives a crap, if a real scientist finds it we'd be like "sweet, what's on Netflix. ". Ironically just about every woo subculture but yours could claim this with some degree of accuracy, but you are not in the club.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom