Latest Bigfoot "evidence"

Status
Not open for further replies.
This thread gets funnier with every page, as Chris' exhortations to anyone willing to waste their time reading his sloppy inventions become more transparently farcical.

There's no way he believes any of this. OntarioSasquatch, maybe. But not Chris. He knows it's a game and he seems to enjoy playing it, even when he's losing. :rolleyes:

Losing? I didn't know I was entered in any contest? I was having a conversation with Comncents. Chris B.
 
Excuse me, I know its not polite, but its not even BLAARGing, LARPINGing, etc. The correct acronym to describe what we are seeing here, I think, is AW - Attention Whoring.

I'm thinking good old fashioned LYING.
 
Crystal Clear game-cam, three-image GIF of Bigfoot errr, elusive, rare 500 pound omnivore.

grizzlies2.gif


From this blog
http://proof.nationalgeographic.com/2015/03/10/looking-for-hungry-grizzlies-on-purpose/
 
Last edited:
GAME CAM IMAGE OF BIGFOOT, RARE 500 POUND OMNIVORE

[qimg]http://proof.nationalgeographic.com/files/2015/03/grizzlies2.gif[/qimg]

I see a Bigfoot! No, not in the foreground- but in the background mostly hidden by the trees. In fact, I see an entire family of Bigfeet. They probably look a lot like shadows to you, but I can see them!
 
Drew, that's a very unusual game camera setup. The lens is at bear level but the accessory light is well above the bear.
 
Oh, so you've seen it now? I thought you said I made it up and was lying? Why on Earth would I be sorry for providing proof that what I said is true? Especially after being wrongfully accused by you of making it all up.
Chris B.

added info: For anyone else that's interested it's around the 24 minute mark they show the game cam pic.
Once again your game play fails you. Pure straw. I know you're a rocket scientist and all, but if you paid attention more you'd see I wasn't disputing that "a game cam pic" existed, I was disputing that "a game cam pic of Bigfoot" existed. Not sure how you missed that being, you know, a rocket scientist. And you then made the comment "...the creature was aware of the game camera." WTF does that really mean? Other than another person, there is no other animal that would know what that device is nor is there any animal that would be able to know what it is. Any fauna awareness of it is solely of a "that's kinda odd" sort. Oh wait, you meant that it really was Bigfoot because even you know that no other animal could know what a game cam is.

Curiously, my accusation you "made it all up" is STILL appropriate because that's no pic of Bigfoot nor should it have been brought up as one, maybe even especially so given you're not going to defend it properly. I'd tell you that what keeps tripping you up is your own lack of candor and conscientiousness, but you'd surely not believe me so I won't tell you.

Oh and of course now you point out where in the video it is. Too funny.
 
Drew, that's a very unusual game camera setup. The lens is at bear level but the accessory light is well above the bear.

The guy that got those shots seems to know what he's doing.
http://proof.nationalgeographic.com/2015/03/10/looking-for-hungry-grizzlies-on-purpose/

This guy does as well.
http://proof.nationalgeographic.com...inters-lens-big-cats-step-into-the-limelight/

They both work for Nat Geo, and we all know that Nat Geo bins all photos of Bigfoot under the threat of strict government watchdogs.
 
Those are high dollar "camera traps" (possibly custom made) and are nothing like what hunters and Bigfooters buy. The flash is not close to the lens - it produces professional quality images. Amazing stuff!
 
Forget the Bigfooters, why isn't he getting Bigfoot raiding Pine Nut stashes?
He doesn't carry honey buns?
Not packing large?
No black Tony Saprano leather jacket?
Most likley not afraid of the dark?
Doesn't mistake stumps for anything but stumps?
Lacks superior sensory perception?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom