Latest Bigfoot "evidence"

Status
Not open for further replies.
CORed said:
One of my most memorable hikes was at night with no illumination except a near-full moon. I started off not intending to go very far, but it just kept getting more interesting, until I ended up on a ridgetop with a great view and lots of twisty old Limber Pines.
Click to expand...

Did a lot of miles in the woods in the Army.

I can't recall using lights much.
 
"I myself posses DNA samples that are possibly collected from a Bigfoot but since I didn't actually see the creature leave the sample, it is still an unknown and therefore unworthy of testing at this time."

So Chris, lets pretend that on one of your research trips, you come across a big, hairy, human-like foot caught in an old forgotten bear trap. Bingo - this is the body part you claim to be looking for. You have stated often that even though you are NO-KILL, only a body part of full body will do. Based on the reasons you are using to not get the saliva tested, you can't get the body part tested either...you didn't see the bigfoot leave it for sure. In fact, that argument pretty much holds for anything you find, doesn't it?

The only thing you are doing by refusing to do something with the saliva and the HD video from 15 ft away is prove that you are just BLAARGing. BTW - the saliva is equivalent to a body part - it has the ability to "prove" the same thing that a bloody foot would.

I'll eat a whole appetizer platter full of bugs and a main course of crow if you show us to be wrong and bigfoot exists.

You are worried about your info getting out, just use your NDA...no problem, right?
 
Claim. Chris B has uncontrovertible evidence.

Response. OK show it.

Chris: I can't.

Do you not see how that might be just a little implausible?
 
Chris,

I understand your reluctance to post your 15' video on the internet. I for one, can't wait until you release it to the public. I was thinking proof of this video would go a long way to boost your credibility. It seems that its come to a point where what ever you say is treated like a joke and is just fodder for insults. I don't know why you even bother to post any more.

I noticed that one of the members here lives in the Kentucky area(Garette). If he were to sign the necessary paperwork and view the video on your computer, he could verify that you do indeed have this video, he has become a "knower" and that everyone should have some respect.

What do you say?
 
Nakani said:
It seems that its come to a point where what ever you say is treated like a joke and is just fodder for insults. I don't know why you even bother to post any more.
Click to expand...
Because being ridiculed and insulted is exactly what Chris wants to happen here.
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
However, if I were to produce a sample that contained unknown primate DNA and news got out. I would certainly have my share of company in the woods of those looking to cash in on my findings.
Click to expand...

And yet you KNOW Bigfoot exists, and you're not at all worried that somebody else could easily bring forth some decent evidence before you and cash in on it? If you truly believed, you'd be releasing anything you had in the hopes of beating all of the other competition. You're not at all worried that someone else will get there first, because you KNOW that they can't, because Bigfoot doesn't exist.
 
Gilbert Syndrome said:
And yet you KNOW Bigfoot exists, and you're not at all worried that somebody else could easily bring forth some decent evidence before you and cash in on it? If you truly believed, you'd be releasing anything you had in the hopes of beating all of the other competition. You're not at all worried that someone else will get there first, because you KNOW that they can't, because Bigfoot doesn't exist.
Click to expand...

You know, I'm really not interested in having a debate with you whether or not Bigfoot exists. It would require no effort or particular thought on your part for your position. Before you remind me this is a Bigfoot evidence thread, let me remind you I am responding to your post to me here and that I have not claimed to have evidence to provide here for you or anyone else.

I would be thrilled if someone else were to provide proof of these creature's existence. It would have no bearing on my own study here. The only thing I would not find thrilling is if that proof was obtained locally as a result of my own personal research or findings. That would equate to reaping the rewards of someone else's work. Chris B.
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
You know, I'm really not interested in having a debate with you whether or not Bigfoot exists. It would require no effort or particular thought on your part for your position. Before you remind me this is a Bigfoot evidence thread, let me remind you I am responding to your post to me here and that I have not claimed to have evidence to provide here for you or anyone else.
Click to expand...
Yet you have claimed to have evidence, you just won't share it with anyone. You have two standing offers for free gratis DNA testing, yet somehow, you run away from those at high velocity.

ChrisBFRPKY said:
I would be thrilled if someone else were to provide proof of these creature's existence. It would have no bearing on my own study here.
Click to expand...
You very much would not be "thrilled" because...

ChrisBFRPKY said:
The only thing I would not find thrilling is if that proof was obtained locally as a result of my own personal research or findings. That would equate to reaping the rewards of someone else's work. Chris B.
Click to expand...
You want the glory for yourself, as you plainly state. If somebody were to discover BF proof on your stomping ground, you would be most peeved, therefore you cloak your particular stomping ground in smoke and shadows and mystery. If on the other hand, some other BLAARG merchant finds actual evidence on some other stomping ground, your particular evidence falls to zero value and there is nothing you can do to prevent it.

On it's face, this would seem to mean that you should be eager to publish but somehow you seem unconcerned that others might pre-empt you. And you know exactly why you are unconcerned. You know for a fact that no others will discover anything at all because there is nothing to discover.
 
abaddon said:
If somebody were to discover BF proof on your stomping ground, you would be most peeved, . . .
Click to expand...

My apologies if this has been addressed, but to Chris or Cervelo, who owns the property on which Chris claims to have watched his footies playing footsie? Private or public land?
 
The Shrike said:
My apologies if this has been addressed, but to Chris or Cervelo, who owns the property on which Chris claims to have watched his footies playing footsie? Private or public land?
Click to expand...


If you knew that he'd have to eat you.
Unless you'd signed a useless NDA of course.
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
You know, I'm really not interested in having a debate with you whether or not Bigfoot exists. It would require no effort or particular thought on your part for your position. Before you remind me this is a Bigfoot evidence thread, let me remind you I am responding to your post to me here and that I have not claimed to have evidence to provide here for you or anyone else.

I would be thrilled if someone else were to provide proof of these creature's existence. It would have no bearing on my own study here. The only thing I would not find thrilling is if that proof was obtained locally as a result of my own personal research or findings. That would equate to reaping the rewards of someone else's work. Chris B.
Click to expand...

You do realize that these statements contradict what you have previously posted? If you now believe that you don't have any evidence to present here, and you don't wish to debate, then what? And you only came to this thread in response to a post to you? How did we even know you were "here" if you didn't post first?
 
The Shrike said:
My apologies if this has been addressed, but to Chris or Cervelo, who owns the property on which Chris claims to have watched his footies playing footsie? Private or public land?
Click to expand...
The hike we took was on public land
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
You know, I'm really not interested in having a debate with you whether or not Bigfoot exists. It would require no effort or particular thought on your part for your position. Before you remind me this is a Bigfoot evidence thread, let me remind you I am responding to your post to me here and that I have not claimed to have evidence to provide here for you or anyone else.

I would be thrilled if someone else were to provide proof of these creature's existence. It would have no bearing on my own study here. The only thing I would not find thrilling is if that proof was obtained locally as a result of my own personal research or findings. That would equate to reaping the rewards of someone else's work. Chris B.
Click to expand...


Your mind works in much the same way as a fat little hamster struggling on a big wheel. Click-clack-click-clack. I really don't understand what kind of test-tubes I need to be filling with colourful fluids inside a white laboratory with stainless steel sinks in order to determine something that a child would determine: Bigfoot is a piece of fiction. Your insistence that I go out and "study" this nothingness just highlights how much of a bloody nugget you are, mate.

Err...yeah, you have claimed to have evidence, and every time anyone brings it up you change your position and chat bollocks to try and deflect the heat which you quite clearly brought upon yourself.

"I have HD footage of Bigfoot shot from 15 feet away..."
"I live on a Bigfoot migration path."
"I've seen them up so close that I can tell the hoaxes from the real-thing."
"I've gotten so close that I can accurately study their feet and know when someone's planted a fake."
"I have footage of a family of Bigfoot of all colours and sizes."

Let's just pretend you never said any of this crap, eh? I mean, why bother being honest now, Chris? Embarrassing.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom