Latest Bigfoot "evidence"

Status
Not open for further replies.
When I collect a sample I know to be from a Bigfoot creature that will contain a good DNA specimen, I'll have my samples tested all. Testing unknown samples at this time is not going to benefit my study in any way.

You can argue otherwise, but it won't change the facts. As of now I'm simply dismissed as chasing an imaginary creature around in the woods of KY. I can do so unhindered and without much competition. However, if I were to produce a sample that contained unknown primate DNA and news got out. I would certainly have my share of company in the woods of those looking to cash in on my findings.


Chris B.

How many samples from North America showing unknown primate would one need? One positive- huge deal! 98% of the value of two. Again, the second one being positive (or negative) would not affect the "validity" of the first. Why wait- you might already have a world-changing Bigfoot sample in your garage! Unless you really suspect/know that there is no Bigfoot, and you are waiting for a second obviously Bigfoot DNA sequence sample to convince you that the first just might (against your suspicion) also be Bigfoot.

If you are afraid of losing credit, testing the sample that you have now avoids the possibility of someone else proving Bigfoot in the time before you find a second sample. Having people and money who will help you follow up a positive DNA test on your first sample would only be a plus. In fact, why are you presenting so many pro-Bigfoot web posts if you don't want to provoke anyone to believe you and join your hunt?

If you don't trust the people on this forum (!) then I am certain that you can contact a University faculty who you do trust and who will do the DNA experiment free or very cheaply. You already found 2 people who would do that on this very forum. That implies a lot of people would be willing and able.
 
Last edited:
Don't you think that "would you eat a bug?" is a bit silly? I knew a 5 year old who would do it for a dollar- would that be an okay deal for you?

At least 2 people here offered to test your spit sample for free- isn't that better than expressing a willingness to eat a bug?
 
--snip--

At least 2 people here offered to test your spit sample for free- isn't that better than expressing a willingness to eat a bug?
Only if they did it while heavily armed and while keeping that fact secret from the institution sponsoring them.
 
If by chance you're wrong, would you agree to eat a bug?

Same question? Chris B.


How old are you? 12? Or just pretending to be?

You know you're not going to ever release anything of value. And we all know that too.
 
Last edited:
It would be great for Chris to have someone else get a DNA sample from a bigfoot.

Then when they submit it to the DNA database, have it match the saliva sample Chris submitted long ago.

Even I would congratulate Chris on that accomplishment. Chris would forever be the first.

Alas, he won't bother, not even for free.
 
Can't harp enough about quality rain gear. Keeps you out in the field, instead of back in your car.

Don't forget gotta be out of the woods before dark....lions, tigers and bears oh my!!!
Hmmmm we need a nickname for Chris.......
 
Don't forget gotta be out of the woods before dark....lions, tigers and bears oh my!!!
Hmmmm we need a nickname for Chris.......

Is there something wrong with safety? You seem to be trying to hint at me being afraid of the dark. That's completely ridiculous. I have better vision than most people you will meet, both during the day and after dark, but I can't see in pitch black without assistance and you can't either.

The only time I ever had a rattlesnake latch onto my leg was in the dark. If it had been daytime, I would have seen it in advance. Those things don't always rattle before biting you know, especially if you step on one. The other poisonous snakes here are completely silent as well. If you're out after dark and smell cucumbers, it's not a caesar salad, it's a copperhead, and you don't know exactly "where" it is.

Of course snakes aren't much of a problem in Winter but there are many other safety factors about being in the woods after dark. Here in particular, you may step into a sink hole and disappear without a trace, or drop off a cliff if you're near a river. Everyone needs to be out of the woods before dark, it's just not safe.
Chris B.
 
You seem to be trying to hint at me being afraid of the dark. That's completely ridiculous. I have better vision than most people you will meet, both during the day and after dark, but I can't see in pitch black without assistance and you can't either.
Cool, more fiction.
 
Is there something wrong with safety? You seem to be trying to hint at me being afraid of the dark. That's completely ridiculous. I have better vision than most people you will meet, both during the day and after dark, but I can't see in pitch black without assistance and you can't either.

The only time I ever had a rattlesnake latch onto my leg was in the dark. If it had been daytime, I would have seen it in advance. Those things don't always rattle before biting you know, especially if you step on one. The other poisonous snakes here are completely silent as well. If you're out after dark and smell cucumbers, it's not a caesar salad, it's a copperhead, and you don't know exactly "where" it is.

Of course snakes aren't much of a problem in Winter but there are many other safety factors about being in the woods after dark. Here in particular, you may step into a sink hole and disappear without a trace, or drop off a cliff if you're near a river. Everyone needs to be out of the woods before dark, it's just not safe.
Chris B.

Can get killed walkin' your doggy.
 
Is there something wrong with safety? You seem to be trying to hint at me being afraid of the dark. That's completely ridiculous. I have better vision than most people you will meet, both during the day and after dark, but I can't see in pitch black without assistance and you can't either.

The only time I ever had a rattlesnake latch onto my leg was in the dark. If it had been daytime, I would have seen it in advance. Those things don't always rattle before biting you know, especially if you step on one. The other poisonous snakes here are completely silent as well. If you're out after dark and smell cucumbers, it's not a caesar salad, it's a copperhead, and you don't know exactly "where" it is.

Of course snakes aren't much of a problem in Winter but there are many other safety factors about being in the woods after dark. Here in particular, you may step into a sink hole and disappear without a trace, or drop off a cliff if you're near a river. Everyone needs to be out of the woods before dark, it's just not safe.
Chris B.
Well you make a great case for the dangers of being out after dark...but you know that's just your experience which appear to make you..you know...kinda afraid of the dark ;)
It was one of the first things you brought up on our hike on a pretty well established trail that you are supposedly familar with. It actually looked like a pretty cool area to hang out, and certainly the family hiking in, as we were hiking out seem to think so.
All I can say is after spending many hours in the woods on and off trail in the dark my experience has been very different from yours.
 
Is there something wrong with safety? You seem to be trying to hint at me being afraid of the dark. That's completely ridiculous. I have better vision than most people you will meet, both during the day and after dark, but I can't see in pitch black without assistance and you can't either.

The only time I ever had a rattlesnake latch onto my leg was in the dark. If it had been daytime, I would have seen it in advance. Those things don't always rattle before biting you know, especially if you step on one. The other poisonous snakes here are completely silent as well. If you're out after dark and smell cucumbers, it's not a caesar salad, it's a copperhead, and you don't know exactly "where" it is.

Of course snakes aren't much of a problem in Winter but there are many other safety factors about being in the woods after dark. Here in particular, you may step into a sink hole and disappear without a trace, or drop off a cliff if you're near a river. Everyone needs to be out of the woods before dark, it's just not safe.
Chris B.

One would get the impression from reading this thread that Chris has never heard of two wonderful inventions: Ponchos and headlamps.
 
One would get the impression from reading this thread that Chris has never heard of two wonderful inventions: Ponchos and headlamps.
Flashlights (LEDs are way bright), Coleman lanterns (old school), glow sticks, etc.
 
Well you make a great case for the dangers of being out after dark...but you know that's just your experience which appear to make you..you know...kinda afraid of the dark ;)
It was one of the first things you brought up on our hike on a pretty well established trail that you are supposedly familar with. It actually looked like a pretty cool area to hang out, and certainly the family hiking in, as we were hiking out seem to think so.
All I can say is after spending many hours in the woods on and off trail in the dark my experience has been very different from yours.

One of my most memorable hikes was at night with no illumination except a near-full moon. I started off not intending to go very far, but it just kept getting more interesting, until I ended up on a ridgetop with a great view and lots of twisty old Limber Pines.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom