Larry Silverstein Takes Questions....

You don't think that this strange obsession with the minutiae of what Silverstein did or didn't say, together with the hounding of the man as shown in the video you linked and endorsed, points more toward malice than stupidity (though I don't rule out stupidity)? Do you realise what ideological company you're keeping?

What exactly are you trying say? Just come out and say it without the fancy foot work.

And assuming you will, my answer is NO.

Silverstein would be treated, by me, the same no matter what his religion was.

Accusations in this thread of being anti-semetic were directed at me, more than once.
 
Indeed, it is disgusting how many Jew-haters are in the TM ranks.

I'm glad you agree.

I think any "Joo-hater" is disgusting. But my comments were not directed in that particular thread to them. Nice play on my words though.
 
What exactly are you trying say? Just come out and say it without the fancy foot work.

And assuming you will, my answer is NO.

Silverstein would be treated, by me, the same no matter what his religion was.

Accusations in this thread of being anti-semetic were directed at me, more than once.
They do say if the shoe fits wear it....
 
Reported? Why....do you feel guilty or is it you don't like to be lumped in with truthers who worship Hufschmid?


Neither.

I don't like being called an anti-semite. You've done it more than once in this thread. I ignored it the first and second time. And I reported it the third time.

Your actions are disgusting and uncalled for. You are now on ignore. Have a nice day.
 
Sizzler...what difference does it make who Silverstein talked to?

What is your point?
 
Reported? Why....do you feel guilty or is it you don't like to be lumped in with truthers who worship Hufschmid?

False dichotomy.

Sizzler has made no anti-semitic references himself. Perhaps he just actually found it inappropriate without any personal guilt or guilt by association.
 
Neither.

I don't like being called an anti-semite. You've done it more than once in this thread. I ignored it the first and second time. And I reported it the third time.

Your actions are disgusting and uncalled for. You are now on ignore. Have a nice day.
See how easy it is guys. Just let them know that they are keeping company with anti-semites and then they go prove that they are AND you get the benefit of them putting you on ignore.
 
False dichotomy.

Sizzler has made no anti-semitic references himself. Perhaps he just actually found it inappropriate without any personal guilt or guilt by association.
OK...so your telling me the truth movement isn't full of nazi wannabes?
 
Sizzler...what difference does it make who Silverstein talked to?

What is your point?

It mattered if the conversation never happened. I initially assumed Larry meant he talked to Nigro. Others here (non-truthers) made that assumption too.

But we now know Nigro did not talk to Larry. Thus I thought that meant Larry was lying about the conversation.

But, there were several commanders that may have been the ones that made the call. Thus Larry may not be a liar, he may just be mistaken.

Thats all.
 
Wouldn't it have been much simpler and not so damning to Sizzler IF he simply answered why he had something against Larry Silverstein? Something so bad (and apparently unknown or embarrasing to Sizzler) that he not only accuses him of lying but he implicates him in murder.
 
I have nothing against the man other than the fact that his statements about his conversations with "a fire chief" are suspicious.

Now that we have no evidence he ever claimed to have spoken with Nigro and now that we have esatblished there were other possible commanders, what exactly is suspicious about it?
 
Last edited:
Strawman.

I'm telling you Sizzler has done nothing to indicate that HE is one.
Your telling me something wrong...why did he implicate Silverstein in murder even though he freely admitted that he has no evidence? What is his reason and why has he avoided answering that question when Pardalis asked?
 
Your telling me something wrong...why did he implicate Silverstein in murder even though he freely admitted that he has no evidence?

Another strawman. He has attempted to implicate him in the intentional destruction of WTC7. No one was murdered when WTC7 fell.

What is his reason and why has he avoided answering that question when Pardalis asked?

Ad ignorantium. "I don't know why he implicated him, and he hasn't answered to my satisfaction, therefore i'll assume it must be because he is Jewish."
 
Another strawman. He has attempted to implicate him in the intentional destruction of WTC7. No one was murdered when WTC7 fell.
And are you seriously claiming that implicating Silverstein in the destruction of WTC 7 is NOT implicating him in the conspiracy that the truthers claim?
 

Back
Top Bottom