The BBC has learned that the fire department representative who spoke with Silverstein was not Nigro.
Do they know who it was, or do they only know that it wasn't Nigro?
The BBC has learned that the fire department representative who spoke with Silverstein was not Nigro.
False dilemma. I think he just doesn't know what the hell he is talking about.
So let's not pretend that he knew what he was talking about when he suggested that it was the firefighting crew that was being pulled.
Silverstein did not lie.
Again, please explain how you know this.
The "pull it" expression has been proven to no having anything to do with CD language.
Read this thread again.
My question came first and it requires either a yes or no answer. Are you hiding something. According to the AJ school of truther proof you are quilty nowYou didn't answer my question though. 7 onsite at WTC7 or WTC complex? Simple question really.
Again, Silversteins religion and ethnic background have no relevance to my position.
Now please answer my question.
That's an entire subject altogether, don't try to lump it in here. The "pull it" expression has been proven to no having anything to do with CD language.
Why so?
No, be a man and retract your accusation.
Sizzler's accusation has been proven wrong.
.
I think it is unlikely on 9-11 that a fire chief would have decided to make a phone call to Larry. I believe they would have been pre-occupied with other tasks, like, putting out fires and saving dying people. But, that is just my opinion, and thus, why I think it is unlikely that anyone called him.
I can be a man. I withdraw my accusation.
I do not have conclusive proof that Larry did not recieve a phone call from one of several chiefs that day.
No.Do you guys and gals agree with Silverstein that the North Tower antenna caused a massive gash in the bldg
Yes.and that the fires that burned all day were fed by diesel fuel?
No, he is recalling to the best of his ability the events of a very chaotic day, to say the least.Or is Silverstein lying through his dentures?
Wrong. It will be proven wrong when someone gives proof that a chief actually called him.
For now, my accustation is not fully supported.
How do you prove a negative?
No, he is recalling to the best of his ability the events of a very chaotic day, to say the least.
Ah, yet more evidence that RedIbis is MIHOP all the way!I'll agree with both points. So let's not pretend that he knew what he was talking about when he suggested that it was the firefighting crew that was being pulled.
What are you willing to wager?