Larry Silverstein Takes Questions....

False dilemma. I think he just doesn't know what the hell he is talking about.

I'll agree with both points. So let's not pretend that he knew what he was talking about when he suggested that it was the firefighting crew that was being pulled.
 
So let's not pretend that he knew what he was talking about when he suggested that it was the firefighting crew that was being pulled.

That's an entire subject altogether, don't try to lump it in here. The "pull it" expression has been proven to no having anything to do with CD language.
 
You didn't answer my question though. 7 onsite at WTC7 or WTC complex? Simple question really.



Again, Silversteins religion and ethnic background have no relevance to my position.

Now please answer my question.
My question came first and it requires either a yes or no answer. Are you hiding something. According to the AJ school of truther proof you are quilty now :)

ETA - If you read exactly what you quoted you would have your answer. Do you know how to read?
 
Last edited:

I think it is unlikely on 9-11 that a fire chief would have decided to make a phone call to Larry. I believe they would have been pre-occupied with other tasks, like, putting out fires and saving dying people. But, that is just my opinion, and thus, why I think it is unlikely that anyone called him.

No, be a man and retract your accusation.

I can be a man. I withdraw my accusation. I do not have conclusive proof that Larry did not recieve a phone call from one of several chiefs that day. All I know is that Larry did not talk to Nigro, the man initially assumed to have made the call (assumed by me and others).
 
I think it is unlikely on 9-11 that a fire chief would have decided to make a phone call to Larry. I believe they would have been pre-occupied with other tasks, like, putting out fires and saving dying people. But, that is just my opinion, and thus, why I think it is unlikely that anyone called him.

So is it unlikely that a fire chief called him or anyone? :confused:

I can be a man. I withdraw my accusation.

Thanks.

I do not have conclusive proof that Larry did not recieve a phone call from one of several chiefs that day.

How do you prove a negative?
 
What in the world is "Ripple In America"? Wasn't the show called "America Remembers"? No wonder these people keep misquoting him as saying "I" or "We made the decision to pull" instead of his real quote, "They made the decision to pull". They can't even get the name of the show right.
 
Speaking only for myself:
Do you guys and gals agree with Silverstein that the North Tower antenna caused a massive gash in the bldg
No.

and that the fires that burned all day were fed by diesel fuel?
Yes.

Or is Silverstein lying through his dentures?
No, he is recalling to the best of his ability the events of a very chaotic day, to say the least.
 
Last edited:
Wrong. It will be proven wrong when someone gives proof that a chief actually called him.

No. your claim was that he lied about his conversation with chief Nigro.

That claim has been proven wrong.

For now, my accustation is not fully supported.

Didn't you just withdraw it?

Are you now claiming that you are not withdrawing your accusation?

:confused::confused::confused::confused::confused::confused:
 
How do you prove a negative?

In this situation, one would have to contact all the chiefs and find out if any of them called Larry.

If they all say, "no". Then that is pretty strong proof that he did not recieve a call from chiefs at WTC7 site on 9-11.
 
I'll agree with both points. So let's not pretend that he knew what he was talking about when he suggested that it was the firefighting crew that was being pulled.
Ah, yet more evidence that RedIbis is MIHOP all the way!

Why don't you just admit it Red?
 

Back
Top Bottom