Larry Silverstein explaining what he meant by 'pull it'

Edx said:
No truther has ever explained how, actually accounting for all the numbers, how he "made out like a bandit.

Why will you guys not explain why he would casually admit blowing up his own building?
Click to expand...

You'd think the insurance company would notice that.
 
Travis said:
You didn't look hard enough. He had a very publicized court case with the Port Authority that was built off the fact that he lost loads of revenue and would lose even more money if he rebuilds any more.
Click to expand...

How does that square with what he received in payouts?
 
RedIbis said:
How does that square with what he received in payouts?
Click to expand...

Hey Red why do you keep ignoring my posts?

Do you think you are safe if a building collapses so long as you are not directly inside it?
 
Last edited:
I just noticed today that Larry didn't want to have WTC 7 evacuated at first, but was argued into it.
I'll find the link. Really sheds some light on the so-called foreknowledge arguments....

ETA can't find it right now Shoulda bookmarked it when i skimmed over it. Damn History Commons...
 
Last edited:
Clayton Moore said:
He said what he said because he could. The 9/11 liars said there were WMD in Iraq and America attacked Iraq. Close to, if not more than a million were killed or maimed by that blatant lie. If no 9/11 liars were dunned for the WMD lie why would a going on 80 9/11 henchman worry about what he said on a stupid video?
Click to expand...

And any bit of research on Middle East history or politics proved that Saddam wasn't linked to 9/11. However, it's the same history that proves that Osama did attack the United States after he promised to and considering his intense distain for our nation, it makes sense.

Heck, even when I did my presentation on debunking 9/11 conspiracies, my International Terrorism professor laughed at the very idea of 9/11 being perpetrated by the government. I also had the honor of meeting Michio Kaku once and he agrees that believing in a conspiracy theory regarding 9/11 is beyond insane.
 
Originally Posted by Clayton Moore
He said what he said because he could. The 9/11 liars said there were WMD in Iraq and America attacked Iraq. Close to, if not more than a million were killed or maimed by that blatant lie. If no 9/11 liars were dunned for the WMD lie why would a going on 80 9/11 henchman worry about what he said on a stupid video?
Click to expand...




Brass said:
And any bit of research on Middle East history or politics proved that Saddam wasn't linked to 9/11. However, it's the same history that proves that Osama did attack the United States after he promised to and considering his intense distain for our nation, it makes sense.

Heck, even when I did my presentation on debunking 9/11 conspiracies, my International Terrorism professor laughed at the very idea of 9/11 being perpetrated by the government. I also had the honor of meeting Michio Kaku once and he agrees that believing in a conspiracy theory regarding 9/11 is beyond insane.
Click to expand...

What does that have to do with Larry?
 
RedIbis said:
How does that square with what he received in payouts?
Click to expand...

The "Larry made out like a bandit" gig is merely a demonstration that you, Clayton Moore, and others in this thread accusing Larry of, for instace; demolishing his own building, won't answer the pertinent questions about why you prefer to omit certain facts when you're making assertions about Mr Larry's "pull it" line. It was not supposed to be a derail as Clayton opportunistically pounced upon, and you by extension have begun to carry on, it was an example of a another topic where you do the same thing,

I suppose if there's one thing that was accomplished it's confirmation that neither of you are interested in any honest debate, but that was pretty obvious from the get go with out this lovely derail. It saves me the trouble of explaining and needing to support my claim seeing as it just got demonstrated right here in front of me.
 
Last edited:
plague311 said:
You want to know why you don't hear about it, because Unlucky Larry doesn't go around whining about it like twoofers whine about his comments. He does the same thing that got him to his successful position in the first place, he uses his assets to continue moving forward.

He had legal work with the Port Authority, and he continues to work to get the buildings back up. Plus, I'm fully convinced you don't read the newspaper, because it's full of "gummamint lyez". So, I am not shocked you haven't read about it. Successful, intelligent, prominent members don't waste their time feeding the twoofer trolls. Believe it or not, to some people, you just aren't worth their time. Fact.
Click to expand...

He's freaking 80 years old. He ain't doing crap. He prolly can't even finish an easy crossword puzzle from a daily newspaper.

He probably just signed his name on papers the neocon puppeteers pushed in front of him to lease and insure the towers before 9/11.
 
WTC Construction Updates, February 2012
By LMCCC | February 09, 2012

4 World Trade Center

Concrete core wall is currently on the 55th Floor. Steel erection is complete up the 62nd Floor. Curtain wall installation has reached the 43rd floor.

3 World Trade Center

1,400 cubic yards of concrete was poured in the first week of February. Ground floor slab is nearly complete. Form work and rebar at the eastern portion of the core walls are on the 5th floor.

2 World Trade Center

Core and perimeter steel are up to street level. The steel framing of the east side Transit Hall entrance is currently underway. Rebar is being installed for the core walls at the B1-ground level and the B1M slab level.

1 World Trade Center

Steel is now on the 90th floor, which is 1,050 feet above grade. Curtain wall is up to the 70th Floor and the application of fireproofing is complete up to the 74th floor.

9/11 Memorial and Museum

The structural steel contractor is substantially complete in the Pavilion and the installation of duct and piping throughout the Pavilion is ongoing. Installation of elevators in the Memorial Pavilion is scheduled to start shortly.
Click to expand...

Really? Having problems finishing those crosswords yet getting buildings built and doing interviews don't seem to be out of his grasp yet. Well done, you shine and shine again.
 
RedIbis said:
How does that square with what he received in payouts?
Click to expand...

I'm not sure what the exact dollar amount was but whatever it was he spent roughly half of it on rent to the Port Authority while he waited for them to clear the site and build their train station so that he could build his new skyscrapers over them. Most of the remainder has been spent on the complicated foundation structures.
 
The State Department, as part of its pathetic efforts to debunk 9/11 research, has posted the response from Silverstein's spokesperson Dara McQuillan on its website.
Click to expand...


The State Department website then comments,

As noted above, when Mr. Silverstein was recounting these events for a television documentary he stated, “I said, you know, we've had such terrible loss of life. Maybe the smartest thing to do is to pull it.” Mr. McQuillan has stated that by “it,” Mr. Silverstein meant the contingent of firefighters remaining in the building.

The insurmountable problem with this explanation of Silverstein's statement is that there were no firefighters inside WTC 7.
Click to expand...

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2006/050106silversteinanswers.htm
 
LOL, I haven't logged in to JREF in a while, but I can't believe this canard is still being debated. I mean common, do some truthers still believe he was strangely admitting to a controlled demolition in the middle of an interview only to deny it later? LOL, wow, almost too funny to be true. It makes zero sense and is one of the more laughable bits of "evidence" pushed by the cult.

I've explained this to cult members dozens of times; Silverstein was clearly talking about pulling firefighters from the WTC7 collapse zone; apparently Daniel Nigro ordered an evacuation because the firefighters knew the building would collapse and they didn't want any more firefighters to be lost. You can see firefighters talking about the collapse here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsrfSKZ7N7U
Roughly @ 1:20
"it's definitely coming down...."

You can also look up all their quotes, and you can find live media coverage anticipating the collapse of WTC7.

Oh, and please don't give me "fire fighters aren't an it" canard either, as "it" refers to the operations themselves, rescue, firefighting, etc... whatever they were doing around WTC7 that Daniel Nigro had them cease.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom