Larry Silverstein explaining what he meant by 'pull it'

Its okay Red will ignore all this and in a few pages or another thread post the same question/claim as if we never said anything just like he's done on this earlier.
 
twinstead said:
Well, It's maybe not THE dumbest (space beams and holographic planes) but it's definitely right up there
Click to expand...

Yet the proponents of this silly theory (RI to be sure) get very angry when someone compares the two.

Can you imagine Silverstein Pull It/FDNY demolition theorist looking down on someone? Hilarious.
 
twinstead said:
Well, It's maybe not THE dumbest (space beams and holographic planes) but it's definitely right up there
Click to expand...

I may be nitpicking, but I would actually classify those claims as more delusional (just my opinion).

Believing a player in the largest attack on US soil went on TV to admit to this and insurance fraud shows a complete lack of independent thinking. Thus, Dumb!
:D
 
cantonear1968 said:
I may be nitpicking, but I would actually classify those claims as more delusional (just my opinion).

Believing a player in the largest attack on US soil went on TV to admit to this and insurance fraud shows a complete lack of independent thinking. Thus, Dumb!
:D
Click to expand...

Your logic is inescapable ;)
 
I can't help but wonder if Silverstien had said pull "them" instead of "it", how many truthers would insist that he was referring to the towers & 7.
 
000063 said:
Despite the fact that both towers had fallen by that point.
Click to expand...


I'm sure that wouldn't stop them. The arrow of time is a horrible inconvenience that must be discarded to get at The Truth™. Look no further than ergo's nonsense involving Jennings and Hess for evidence.
 
Cl1mh4224rd said:
I'm sure that wouldn't stop them. The arrow of time is a horrible inconvenience that must be discarded to get at The Truth™. Look no further than ergo's nonsense involving Jennings and Hess for evidence.
Click to expand...
The facts are irrelevant in pursuit of the Truth?

Sounds like "no fighting in the War Room!"
 
cantonear1968 said:
As Alienentity put it, that's the end of the story.
[I've always considered this the dumbest of truther claims.]
Click to expand...
No where near the dumbest... but still downright stupid. The argument twists context and omits other ongoing operations in the immediate vicinity of the building from the equation. Red will ignore it like he ignores anything asking him to prove his claim that "Larry made out like a bandit" but he's far from the only that does this. You can't argue with these people, because no matter how much you highlight their discrepancies, they won't acknowledge that they even exist. Sigmund Freud would be rolling in his grave trying to understand conspiracy theorists.
 
Last edited:
Grizzly Bear said:
No where near the dumbest... but still downright stupid. The argument twists context and omits other ongoing operations in the immediate vicinity of the building from the equation. Red will ignore it like he ignores anything asking him to prove his claim that "Larry made out like a bandit" but he's far from the only that does this. You can't argue with these people, because no matter how much you highlight their discrepancies, they won't acknowledge that they even exist. Sigmund Freud would be rolling in his grave trying to understand conspiracy theorists.
Click to expand...

Larry did make out like a bandit. Either he did or, because of the size of the numbers involved, he took a serious bath. There is no in between because of the size of the numbers. I've never seen any Unlucky Larry sob stories in the Sunday newspaper magazines so Lucky Larry made out like freaking bandit.

Sigmund would marvel at how easily the TV generation is convinced that obvious lies are the truth. Millions of video game couch potatoes all couch ready for machinations of his psychological theory.
 
Clayton Moore said:
Larry did make out like a bandit. Either he did or, because of the size of the numbers involved, he took a serious bath. There is no in between because of the size of the numbers. I've never seen any Unlucky Larry sob stories in the Sunday newspaper magazines so Lucky Larry made out like freaking bandit.

Sigmund would marvel at how easily the TV generation is convinced that obvious lies are the truth. Millions of video game couch potatoes all couch ready for machinations of his psychological theory.
Click to expand...

No truther has ever explained how, actually accounting for all the numbers, how he "made out like a bandit.

Why will you guys not explain why he would casually admit blowing up his own building?
 
Edx said:
No truther has ever explained how, actually accounting for all the numbers, how he "made out like a bandit.

Why will you guys not explain why he would casually admit blowing up his own building?
Click to expand...

He said what he said because he could. The 9/11 liars said there were WMD in Iraq and America attacked Iraq. Close to, if not more than a million were killed or maimed by that blatant lie. If no 9/11 liars were dunned for the WMD lie why would a going on 80 9/11 henchman worry about what he said on a stupid video?
 
Clayton Moore said:
He said what he said because he could. The 9/11 liars said there were WMD in Iraq and America attacked Iraq. Close to, if not more than a million were killed or maimed by that blatant lie. If no 9/11 liars were dunned for the WMD lie why would a going on 80 9/11 henchman worry about what he said on a stupid video?
Click to expand...

You want to know why you don't hear about it, because Unlucky Larry doesn't go around whining about it like twoofers whine about his comments. He does the same thing that got him to his successful position in the first place, he uses his assets to continue moving forward.

He had legal work with the Port Authority, and he continues to work to get the buildings back up. Plus, I'm fully convinced you don't read the newspaper, because it's full of "gummamint lyez". So, I am not shocked you haven't read about it. Successful, intelligent, prominent members don't waste their time feeding the twoofer trolls. Believe it or not, to some people, you just aren't worth their time. Fact.
 
And your subsequent posts only prove my point Clayton; the moment I brought up an example unrelated to the omissions you people leave out in your Larry S.'s "pull it" arguments, you took it on hook line and sinker to ignore those gaps.
 
Last edited:
Clayton Moore said:
Larry did make out like a bandit. Either he did or, because of the size of the numbers involved, he took a serious bath. There is no in between because of the size of the numbers. I've never seen any Unlucky Larry sob stories in the Sunday newspaper magazines so Lucky Larry made out like freaking bandit.

Sigmund would marvel at how easily the TV generation is convinced that obvious lies are the truth. Millions of video game couch potatoes all couch ready for machinations of his psychological theory.
Click to expand...

You didn't look hard enough. He had a very publicized court case with the Port Authority that was built off the fact that he lost loads of revenue and would lose even more money if he rebuilds any more.
 
Clayton Moore said:
He said what he said because he could.
Click to expand...

That is not an answer.

You have not explained WHY any SANE INTELLIGENT person would admit a terrible crime and conspiracy on camera and do so completely casually as if he is totally unaware he is doing it.

You have also not explained why no one apart from your fringe group noticed this, if it really is so obvious that is what he meant.

The 9/11 liars said there were WMD in Iraq and America attacked Iraq.
Click to expand...

But according to you, this is like Bush and/or Cheney casually admitting on pre-recorded video that they lied about the WMD's and no one apart from a small fringe group noticed this admission.

If no 9/11 liars were dunned for the WMD lie why would a going on 80 9/11 henchman worry about what he said on a stupid video?
Click to expand...

Why would he say it at all? You were saying earlier that it was a huge insurance fraud, well if he wanted to commit insurance fraud why did he admit it? Why wouldn't the insurance companies take issue with it? And if its that easy to get money out of them why was it necessary to take such a huge risk in the first place? There is no reason whatsoever that Silverstein would casually admit a huge conspiracy and, according to people like Alex Jones, mass murder on prerecorded Tv with neither him or anyone else relevant batting an eye.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom