Trump is a gun grabber. According to the anti-gun people, like you and Trump, almost every single firearm in the USA is too small, too large, too powerful, too useless or too "something". Gun grabbers always have an excuse.
You are being evasive. Can you point out the pro-gun aspects of his 2018 gun grab?
Hey he is giving gun rights back to felons that has to count as pro gun right there.
I'm anti-gun? You have no idea how stupid a statement that was.
I'm not being evasive. I am pointedly refusing to answer a question so stupid that I would have refused to answer it even if doing so would not have required me reading the 42-page document that you laughingly expect me to read.
Well, I guess I'll take the "gun grabber," who, following the worst mass shooting in American history, had the restraint, despite the political pressure, to just bar a gun accessory good only for indiscriminate shooting into a crowd by an unskilled shooter; the "gun grabber," who, on the other hand, has made it policy to appoint pro-2A judges to all federal courts including three such justices to the Supreme Court, affirmed 2nd Amendment rights to be on a par with all other constitutional rights, appointed the first ever DOJ task force to fight unconstitutional state anti-gun laws, filed the first-ever amicus briefs opposing state gun restrictions, deregulated suppressors and handgun braces, reigned in the ATF, and is heralded by every gun-rights group in the country as the most pro-2A president in modern history.
The Second Amendment is technically a law. So, no.
Gun grabbers are, by definition, anti-gun. Presidents, like Trump, who propose gun confiscation without due process are extreme anti-gun zealots.
All of those gun-rights organizations made it clear that grabbing guns was not a deal breaker when it came to supporting Trump's nomination in 2020 and 2024. They are money grubbing subscription services more than they gun rights organizations.
Well, seeing as how Trump is a convicted felon, duh.
Okay, let’s pretend we’re in the First Grade: When you want to decide on which side of an issue someone is on, you have to consider the totality of the evidence. Just because someone did one thing you disagree with doesn’t justify ignoring everything they did (without modern precedence) in favor of the cause you claim to support.
If the amount of stupid stuff he's already done isn't enough for some people, then there will never be enough 'stupid stuff' for them. Just like for some Nazis there was never enough for them to stop supporting Hitler.
You have come down firmly on the anti-gun zealot's side. Trump has done or said more than one thing. Why would you give Trump any credit at all for the recent lowering of the NFA taxes? I do not recall seeing Trump pushing for any such thing. As far as I know, a Congresscritter sneaked that into the BBB, without input from Trump.
Yeah I think his approval rating is just about on par with the MAGA proportion; not too many others though. And those folks will never stray from their Dear Leader.
How do you define a liberal interpretation of the 2nd Amendment? Do you mean that I am too tolerant of the idea that the 2nd Amendment protects an individual right to bear arms? Or that I side with the liberal democrats and favor the idea that it is a collective right?
How do you define a liberal interpretation of the 2nd Amendment? Do you mean that I am too tolerant of the idea that the 2nd Amendment protects an individual right to bear arms? Or that I side with the liberal democrats and favor the idea that it is a collective right?
Sarcasm? I can rarely tell.
And a lake grabber and a ***** grabber.
First graders are smart enough to laugh at renaming Lake Ontario.
Not according to even YouGov's poll which is overwhelmingly against it.
Fake polls!
www.theguardian.com
