• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

KSM Conspiracy Charges Analyzed and Debunked

OK, I will bite. How the #^$% did you come up with Atta being a Christian?

He ordered a package just in time for Christmas. A real Muslim would not do this. It is all explained in the text.

When is Screw Loose Change going to debunk the article?
 
Last edited:
He ordered a package just in time for Christmas. A real Muslim would not do this. It is all explained in the text.

When is Screw Loose Change going to debunk the article?

There is nothing to debunk. I actually read this before you even started the thread. "I don't believe this is true" is not an argument. There is nothing for me to respond to, you would have to put forward an actual argument with supporting evidence for me to say anything about it.

ETA: So Muslims are not allowed to purchase anything in the month before Christmas, a Christian holiday? I am just baffled by your "logic".
 
Last edited:
Didn't you know Muslims stop ordering stuff in December because it's against their belief?:rolleyes:

If we had calenders marking the days of significance to all the worlds religions other than our own and we prohibited ourselves from conducted trade or commerce two weeks prior to those days for fear of being taken as an adherent of one or more of those faiths we'd all fraqqing starve to death.
 
Maybe he's Jewish.

Or maybe it was someone's Birthday.
Both my grandmothers and my father have birthdays in December.
 
Last edited:
Maybe he's Jewish.

Or maybe it was someone's Birthday.
Both my grandmothers and my father have birthdays in December.

Or maybe he was a psycho-muslim and the Boeing flight manual he bought was to teach himself how to turn a civilian airliner into an infidel-killing WMD?

Cuz... ya know... that's how non-christians observe the birth of the "Prince of Peace". :rolleyes:
 
"I knew Kevin Barrett, Kevin Barrett was a friend of mine, and you, Sir, are no Kevin Barrett."

This is true.

I have never abused anyones wife, denied the Holocaust or advocated the conversion of all mankind into "slaves of Allah".

You need to choose better friends.
 
You think the government case is that weak?

No, because you don't address the actual evidence. There is no there there. What is the point of arguing this with somebody who doesn't even know the basic facts, like how Mohammed Atta was a PhD candidate in Germany when he got introduced to jihadism. That would be like wasting my time arguing the Kennedy assassination with someone who didn't know that Oswald was a Marine.
 
Atta was not a terrorist, he was a Christian. Please see alleged overt act # 67.:cool:
He ordered a package just in time for Christmas. A real Muslim would not do this. It is all explained in the text.
"the text" only states that "it could be evidence that Atta is a Christian" (bolding mine), not that he was one.
You twist the words of your own source. How dumb is that ?

But even expressed as a possibility, this part of #67 is completely stupid... There is absolutely nothing that suggests these videos were ordered as a christmas gift.
 
You twist the words of your own source. How dumb is that ?


It gets even dumber when you realize that Galileo is Rolf Lindgren, the majority author of that source.

Yes... he's misrepresenting his own work.
 
Take what he says? You do realize that he is dead, right?

Does it make sense you to that someone would just drop out of a PhD program in architecture in Germany to become an airline pilot in Florida?

To be fair, Dolph Lundren dropped out of a PhD program at MIT (with a Fulbright scholarship!) to be an actor. And I personally know someone who has a PhD who gave up doing biochem research to become a professional woodworker.

Neither of which means Atta wasn't a terrorist, mind you....
 
It gets even dumber when you realize that Galileo is Rolf Lindgren, the majority author of that source.

Yes... he's misrepresenting his own work.
Nice...

The amount of twisted logical reasoning in thuthers' statements never cease to amaze me. This #67 is a good example of that. We are supposed to believe in Atta's innocence because he did things that a "real muslim" would supposedly not do.

Let's assume that the part about the "pork chops" is real. I don't know, and I don't care. Let's just see how it unfolds, from a truther point of view.

A "real muslim" won't eat pork. So, Atta cannot be a "real muslim". And only "real muslims" can be terrorists. Ergo, Atta was not a terrorist. That's brilliant, isn't it ? Clear, simple, logical. Who cares if it is simplistic ? Who cares if it sums up a human being in just 2 tiny words ? Who cares if becoming a terrorist does not imply in any way that the guy followed the Coran to the letter - especially knowing that becoming a martyr wash away all your sins? Not truthers, obviously.

Plus, that speaks volumes about what truthers think what a "real muslim" is, but I won't go down that road...
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom