Kevin Barrett, Supercreepafragalisticparanoidatrocious

[gumboot]

I find it funny that CTers will adamantly stand beside something that is an outright blatant lie, such as the claim that Gravy was misquoting Silverstein. Heh. I even used their own evidence to find out he was utterly 100% wrong. I did a search for "silverstein pull it" on you tube and the first hit was one of Killtown's videos. Thank you Killtown for helping me debunk Wizzy so thoroughly.

I love these CTers.

-Gumboot

 

[The Doc]

Once our CT'er friends believe something, they don't have the ability to discard their statements and change their beliefs. I seriously doubt Barrett will change that.

 

[JamesB]

Bill O'Reilly said live on air that he would like to see Mr Barrett floating in a river.

No he didn't. The quote was :

This guy would have been gone at Boston University, my alma mater, in a heartbeat. The Chancellor there, John Silber, this guy would be, you know, in the Charles River floating down towards the harbor.

He is just talking about him being kicked out, in the hypothetical case if he worked at another university. There is no threat, explicit or otherwise.

Ironically, Barrett directly threatened employees at Foxnews with hanging:

O'Reilly doesn't like that, and neither does the other guys at Fox News. In fact they're feeling pretty threatened right now and I would be too if I was in their shoes because they're setting themselves up for complicity in high treason and mass murder charges. When this thing hits the fan, the leadership in our nation's corporate media may just end up dangling from the end of a rope.

http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/10/kevin-barrett-threatens-violence.html

If the truth is on your side, why do you people lie so much?

 

[R.Mackey]

OK I ADMIT IM PDOHERTY. i WILL BE LEAVING. THIS TRULY IS A WASTE OF TIME.

What, banned again?? Are you freaking kidding me? Not that all of us didn't suspect, but still...

This is a sad commentary indeed on the state of the 9/11 Deniers. Never mind the thousands of posts under seven (or more?) aliases and not a lick of sense between them. But contemplate, if you will, the sheer obsession with fighting us here. That's what it is.

Pathetic.

 

[The Doc]

Funny thing is that pdoh accounts for 7% of the posts at the LC forum. Says something about LC fans eh.

 

[~enigma~]

I find it funny that CTers will adamantly stand beside something that is an outright blatant lie, such as the claim that Gravy was misquoting Silverstein. Heh. I even used their own evidence to find out he was utterly 100% wrong. I did a search for "silverstein pull it" on you tube and the first hit was one of Killtown's videos. Thank you Killtown for helping me debunk Wizzy so thoroughly.

I love these CTers.

-Gumboot

Want to see how dishonest they are. Go check the video in my waterboy thread.

 

[LashL]

Excellent work, Gravy.

The troofers' own words ultimately hang themselves, but it takes diligent work such as yours to bring them to light and expose them for the pathetic cretins that they are, and you do that so very well.

And every time a sock like "wizard" shows up to try to derail a legitimate thread with the usual CT obfuscation and nonsense in the usual tinhat fashion, well, that just makes it even more obvious to lurkers and fencesitters that in the case of the self proclaimed "truth movement", the word "truth" is synonymous with "bowel".


Again, excellent work.

 

[Brainster]

I heard back from Barrett (well, he replied as "Khidria," but I assume it's him). In a two-sentence email, he said that he would be saving my email as evidence against me, and that I would be standing on the gallows beside the traitor, mass murderer, and insurance fraudster Larry Silverstein.

Makes me wonder if these dopes think that all the Mumia supporters should be hanged if he's ever put to death.

 

[NoZed Avenger]

I find it funny that CTers will adamantly stand beside something that is an outright blatant lie, such as the claim that Gravy was misquoting Silverstein. Heh. I even used their own evidence to find out he was utterly 100% wrong. I did a search for "silverstein pull it" on you tube and the first hit was one of Killtown's videos. Thank you Killtown for helping me debunk Wizzy so thoroughly.

Yes, and the indignant demand for Gravy to change his quote for an alleged error that would make no difference to the meaning, even if it were wrong -- while complete silence on the Barrett error that is being used to show an "admission" of what would essentially be fraud and mass murder.

I love these CTers.

Well, we part company on that one.

 

[Oliver]

It really starts to annoy me that PDooDoo is banned over
and over again because this means 3-4 Days without his
funny comments before he shows up again.

 

[Trigood]

You are wrong.

"I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, [uh,] telling me that they were not sure they were going to be [not "gonna be"] able to contain the fire, and I said, 'You know, we've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is .. is pull it.' Uh, and they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse." –Larry Silverstein

Gravy,
After listening at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3E-26oVIIs
I noted a few minor errors in your quote (in bold above). (I didn't hear the first "uh," but did hear it later, and the usage "going to be," not "gonna be," and I heard a "you know" and an extra "is" in there.) Nothing major, but, after all, I am the Assistant Grammar-Puss of the NWO!

By the way, great letters to Mister Barrett!

 

[MikeW]

I heard back from Barrett (well, he replied as "Khidria," but I assume it's him). In a two-sentence email, he said that he would be saving my email as evidence against me, and that I would be standing on the gallows beside the traitor, mass murderer, and insurance fraudster Larry Silverstein.

Keep in mind that (if this was him) Barret's behind the www.mujca.com site, above which are the words:

Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor (Exodus 16).
So then, putting away falsehood, let all of us speak the truth to our neighbors, for we are all members of one another. (Ephesians 4:25)
They try to deceive Allah and those who believe, but they only deceive themselves, and realise it not. (Qur'aan 2:9)

But meanwhile it's okay to knowingly publish falsehoods on your own web site, and threaten people who point them out, just as long as it's in "a good cause". Obviously.

 

[Horatius]

Keep in mind that (if this was him) Barret's behind the www.mujca.com site, above which are the words:

And after all that whining by Wizard about the "Death Threats", what do we find on that site?

Boston Tea Party Kicks off 9/11 Truth Revolution
Barrett to Throw “Mr. Bill” O’Reilly in Harbor—But Will He Pull Him Out?

 

[DarkMagician]

Okay, found another P'Doh Sock. Who called it?

 

[Brainster]

Okay, found another P'Doh Sock. Who called it?

The smart thing he does is invent new styles for each of his socks. IIRC PDOH himself used the "u" and "ur" abbreviations. But I laughed when I saw him claim that Gravy blew the Silverstein quote; that was a dead giveaway.

Of course, the real question is who PDOH was a sock for.

 

[LashL]

The smart thing he does is invent new styles for each of his socks. IIRC PDOH himself used the "u" and "ur" abbreviations. But I laughed when I saw him claim that Gravy blew the Silverstein quote; that was a dead giveaway.

Of course, the real question is who PDOH was a sock for.

Puts me in mind of an old Talking Heads song. I can hear P'doh now, calling his fellow twoofers to arms:

We dress like students, we dress like housewives
or in a suit and a tie
I changed my hairstyle so many times now
don't know what I look like!

and to change a line from elsewhere in the same song lyrics, I can hear him saying this, too:

I got ten IDs on so many forums,
don't even know my real name

 

[defaultdotxbe]

The smart thing he does is invent new styles for each of his socks. IIRC PDOH himself used the "u" and "ur" abbreviations. But I laughed when I saw him claim that Gravy blew the Silverstein quote; that was a dead giveaway.

Of course, the real question is who PDOH was a sock for.

his claims that alex jones has never lied were another dead giveaway

 

[Gravy]

Gravy,
After listening at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3E-26oVIIs
I noted a few minor errors in your quote (in bold above). (I didn't hear the first "uh," but did hear it later, and the usage "going to be," not "gonna be," and I heard a "you know" and an extra "is" in there.) Nothing major, but, after all, I am the Assistant Grammar-Puss of the NWO!

By the way, great letters to Mister Barrett!

You're right, Trigood. That version is one I asked people to read at Ground Zero on 9/11. I had copied it from a CT website and deleted most of the pauses for easier reading. The first "uh" is in the wrong place, and I didn't notice that he says "going to" and not "gonna"

 

[ref]

You're right, Trigood. That version is one I asked people to read at Ground Zero on 9/11. I had copied it from a CT website and deleted most of the pauses for easier reading. The first "uh" is in the wrong place, and I didn't notice that he says "going to" and not "gonna"

I have to admit, that before today I had no idea who you were. Then I saw the hardfire debate with You, Bermas and Avery and found out. Respect for all you work on the subject, not to say I agree on every detail . I guess if someone gets you to doubt something, they can get anyone.

To stay on the subject, it really bothers me when someone is proven wtong and they continue to rely on their false belief. That's wrong and denial. And that bother me the most about the so called CT. Nobody can now everything about that day. But when something is clearly proven to be false, everyone should agree on that and continue the debate on other subjects. Of course it is also up to debate, what it takes to prove something 100%. But that's up to everyone's person. I have changed my view on many of the subjects. I still have doubt on others. But I don't want to rely ono false evidence. I want to bring out the topics that still seem unclear or unexplained.

I'd like to ask You a couple of questions. Everybody else can answer as well.

1. What is your take on the Able Danger program?

2. What is your answer to the National Security Whistleblowers Coalition's petition to the congress?

http://www.nswbc.org/Congressional Testimonies & Letters/NSWBC Letter Sept 13, 2004.htm

And to all the NSWBC allegations concerning 9/11 and Al Qaida?

Can be found here.

http://www.nswbc.org/index.htm

3. Why were none of the 4 black boxes officially found at the WTC, but [SIZE=-1]Mike Bellone and Nicholas De Masi talk about three being found?

4. Why did Bush repeatedly say to have seen the first hit live on TV?

5. Do you think that flight 77 hit the radar gap by accident, or was there knowledge about the radar gaps publicly available before 9/11?

Appreciate every civilized answer by everyone.

[/SIZE]

 

[troy in wv]

Kevin Barrett's going to be interviewing one of the supposed hijackers this Spring in Morocco. :rolls eyes: