July US Presidential Strawpoll

shanek said:
I'm sorry, but there is just NO APPRECIABLE DIFFERENCE between Bush and Kerry. At least with Nader, you have quite a few differences of opinion with the Big Two. But Michael Badnarik is the ONLY candidate who has displayed an understanding of what the Constitution even says, much less how important it is to end the Income Tax and get the government out of our lives.
Click to expand...
Thanks for your input, shanek.

Badnarik is, unfortunately, a joke. I suggest you fight more for the emergence of third-party candidates in general. The US version of democracy sorely needs it.
 
DanishDynamite said:


Good grief! Ed-God, I thought you were just a cynical I've-done-my-part-and-got rich-doing-it American.

It now appears that you have no understanding beyond that.

Sad.
Click to expand...

You seem to be distressed that I don't instinctively hate GWB. Sorry, I don't. If not knee jerk agreeing with you suggests that I have no understanding, ok.
 
Ed said:


You seem to be distressed that I don't instinctively hate GWB. Sorry, I don't. If not knee jerk agreeing with you suggests that I have no understanding, ok.
Click to expand...
OK, Ed.

In your infinite wisdom, try to evalute the latest encroachments on civil liberties which the current administration has envoked, versus the supposed crisis the US is currently experiencing.

Please tell me where in the Constitution it says that general denial of rights is OK during imagined situations by the current administration that a super-Constitutional crisis exists?
 
DanishDynamite said:
OK, Ed.

In your infinite wisdom, try to evalute the latest encroachments on civil liberties which the current administration has envoked, versus the supposed crisis the US is currently experiencing.

Please tell me where in the Constitution it says that general denial of rights is OK during imagined situations by the current administration that a super-Constitutional crisis exists?
Click to expand...

I'm not Ed but I'll pretend you asked me as well....

Right after you show me where in constitution the right to privacy exists, if you are such a distinguished US Constitution scholar.
 
DanishDynamite said:
Thanks for your input, shanek.

Badnarik is, unfortunately, a joke. I suggest you fight more for the emergence of third-party candidates in general. The US version of democracy sorely needs it.
Click to expand...

Says the self-important European from on high...

*yawn*
 
DanishDynamite said:


Unbelievable that anyone of any intelligence would vote for further degradation of their civil liberties and for keeping a braindead in office. Just unbelievable.
Click to expand...

LOL

You're one to talk.
 
DanishDynamite said:
Please tell me where in the Constitution it says that general denial of rights is OK during imagined situations by the current administration that a super-Constitutional crisis exists?
Click to expand...

Such a loaded question is beneath you, DD.

Warning, DD, your bias is showing... ;)
 
Grammatron said:
I'm not Ed but I'll pretend you asked me as well....
Click to expand...

Indeed, you are not Ed. :)

Right after you show me where in constitution the right to privacy exists, if you are such a distinguished US Constitution scholar.
Click to expand...
Not understood.
 
Kodiak said:


Says the self-important European from on high...

*yawn*
Click to expand...

Au contraire, it is the one who understands democracy as much more than the choice between 2 (two) parties as the height of democracy, who is tryíng to educate the ignorant American masses.

[Edited]
 
Tony said:


LOL

You're one to talk.
Click to expand...
Not understood.

(Please try to highten the level of exchange, so that intellectuals may be able to understand your blathering.)
 
Kodiak said:


Such a loaded question is beneath you, DD.

Warning, DD, your bias is showing... ;)
Click to expand...
Whatever.

Loaded questions are "par for the course" in this forum, Kodiak.
 
DanishDynamite said:
Thanks for your input, shanek.

Badnarik is, unfortunately, a joke. I suggest you fight more for the emergence of third-party candidates in general. The US version of democracy sorely needs it.
Click to expand...

Boy, we're just getting tons of good advice from our friends across the pond, aren't we? You ought to be charging an hourly rate for this kind of genius, DD.

Oh, I tried to speak to the US Ambassador to Denmark to smooth things over, but as it turns out your little nation isn't important enough to justify having an ambassador. You guys have to share one with Romania and Luxembourg.
 
DanishDynamite said:
Not understood.
Click to expand...

It's kind of hypocritical for someone who supports a gun ban and thinks our rights come from government to whine about civil liberties.

(Please try to highten the level of exchange, so that intellectuals may be able to understand your blathering.)
Click to expand...

When Ed, Kodiak, ShaneK, rikzilla, Jocko, Larspeart and Grammatron express a lack of understanding of my posts I'll clarify.
 
DanishDynamite said:
OK, Ed.

In your infinite wisdom, try to evalute the latest encroachments on civil liberties which the current administration has envoked, versus the supposed crisis the US is currently experiencing.

Please tell me where in the Constitution it says that general denial of rights is OK during imagined situations by the current administration that a super-Constitutional crisis exists?
Click to expand...

With this post, I would like to formally move to rename the "No True Scotsman" fallacy to the "No True Dane" fallacy.

Do I have a second?
 
Jocko said:


Boy, we're just getting tons of good advice from our friends across the pond, aren't we? You ought to be charging an hourly rate for this kind of genius, DD.

Oh, I tried to speak to the US Ambassador to Denmark to smooth things over, but as it turns out your little nation isn't important enough to justify having an ambassador. You guys have to share one with Romania and Luxembourg.
Click to expand...
Thanks for your usual input.
 
Tony said:


It's kind of hypocritical for someone who supports a gun ban and thinks our rights come from government to whine about civil liberties.
Click to expand...
Why?

When Ed, Kodiak, ShaneK, rikzilla, Jocko, Larspeart and Grammatron express a lack of understanding of my posts I'll clarify.
Click to expand...
Biased, are we?
 
Originally posted by DanishDynamite
OK, Ed.

In your infinite wisdom, try to evalute the latest encroachments on civil liberties which the current administration has envoked, versus the supposed crisis the US is currently experiencing.

It is difficult for me to evaluate since it has not effected either me or anyone I know. What specific one's are you talking about?

Please tell me where in the Constitution it says that general denial of rights is OK during imagined situations by the current administration that a super-Constitutional crisis exists?


It is difficult to have a conversation where the end point is already decided by one party. "imagined situations"? What rights are generally denied? It sort of sounds like "I hate him because I hate him". I will be interested to see how far the Oil For Food scandal extends into Europe. I wonder how much what you hear over there was bought. I am reserving judgement but I doubt if your local information sources are above pressure.[/QUOTE]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom