July US Presidential Strawpoll

[c0rbin]

Yes, but those specifics have to operate in the realm of the powers specifically given by the Constitution.

In other words, the interested party would have to share their goals with congress, get them to help write and ratify a course of action (everything from who is a combatant to how they are to be handled), and not veer from those pre-defined operational definitions.

All this is to be done before action takes place.

Is this correct?

 

[Frostbite]

Imma cunuck and Bush is EVIL!!!1

 

[Rob Lister]

In other words, the interested party would have to share their goals with congress, get them to help write and ratify a course of action (everything from who is a combatant to how they are to be handled), and not veer from those pre-defined operational definitions.

All this is to be done before action takes place.

Is this correct?

You're good.

 

[shanek]

In other words, the interested party would have to share their goals with congress, get them to help write and ratify a course of action (everything from who is a combatant to how they are to be handled), and not veer from those pre-defined operational definitions.

All this is to be done before action takes place.

Is this correct?

What "interested party" are you talking about? Congress can do any of the things I mentioned that the Constitution authorizes.

 

[hammegk]

Thank Ed the Executive Branch actually worries about reality, or we'd all be speaking German east of the Mississippi, Japanese to the west-- those of us alive that is.

 

[shanek]

Thank Ed the Executive Branch actually worries about reality, or we'd all be speaking German east of the Mississippi, Japanese to the west-- those of us alive that is.

World War II was handled Constitutionally.

 

[Rob Lister]

World War II was handled Constitutionally.

Which brings us full circle to the point you originally made. Would Americans of Japanese descent agree with your statement?

 

[Frank Newgent]

Thank Ed the Executive Branch actually worries about reality, or we'd all be speaking German east of the Mississippi, Japanese to the west-- those of us alive that is.

What if a Bush had been President then?

 

[Rob Lister]

What if a Bush had been President then?

I understand your question, but not the context of it...nor the link provided by it.

BTW, I don't really recommend the book. It's interesting enough to get half-way through but is slows to such an extent that you forget you're reading it. Dicks other works are better, IMO.

 

[shanek]

Which brings us full circle to the point you originally made. Would Americans of Japanese descent agree with your statement?

What hammegk was talking about had nothing to do with the unconstitutional internment of Japanese-Americans. Cut it out.

 

[c0rbin]

What "interested party" are you talking about? Congress can do any of the things I mentioned that the Constitution authorizes.

Citizens who want to "do any of the things" you mentioned that the Constitution authorizes--from el Presidente to me.

 

[shanek]

Citizens who want to "do any of the things" you mentioned that the Constitution authorizes--from el Presidente to me.

Complete ignorance. The Constitution only lays out the powers of the Federal governments and places restrictions on the State governments. It doesn't give you or authorize you to do anything.

 

[Larspeart]

As I have stated before, I feel that Badnarik is the least electable, capable, and good for the party of the 3 candidates that ran for the Lib primary. I would have much prefered Nolan to win, and even Russo brought image, charisma, and funding to the party.

Still, Badnarik is the best candidate by far of the 4 major folks that are running (bush, kerry, nader being the other 3).


The Libs at the convention did us no favor as a party by voting for the guy who told the sounder debate, ESPECIALLY since we aren't allowed into any of the presidential debates by the 2 big parties.

A Nolan/Russo ticket would have done a LOT to get our name, message, and word out.

 

[c0rbin]

Complete ignorance. The Constitution only lays out the powers of the Federal governments and places restrictions on the State governments. It doesn't give you or authorize you to do anything.

Complete, huh?

Thanks for answering my questions.