• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

July Stundie Nominations

Here's a neat piece of excessive precision from our resident Libertarian thread derailer.

the odds of any alleged government conspiracy theory being true are more like 1 in 5 rather than 1 in 720.

Any alleged government conspiracy theory. That means that, of the 50 or so mutually contradictory theories put forward by the truth movement, about 10 are true. A beautiful piece of proof by assertion.

Dave
 
size of light said:
Here's an interesting one:

She was coronated on June 2nd, 1953. (2/6/53)
52
years, 1 month, 5 days) later: 52 people murdered.

She became Queen on 6th February, 1952. (6/2/52)
53
years, 5 months, 1 day later, 52 people were murdered.

So much symmetry it burns the eyes.


(bolding as in original post - Mel.)

Thread Title: 7/7 Was for Queen Elizabeth's Jubilee


That entire thread is a Stundie goldmine. Feel free to do some prospecting!
 
Last edited:
Same guy, next page:

size of light said:
I'd imagine they would have run highly accurate computer simulations to calculate the number of fatalities these bombs were going to produce, occult implications or not.

It wouldn't then be difficult to adjust that number down slightly to guarantee 52 fatalities wasn't exceeded. Easy to then allow a few more of the seriously wounded to die amidst the chaos or behind closed doors to hit the right mark.


And/or, could it be possible that once they had all their occult dates and numbers aligned correctly and invoked the appropriate demon, it then became a certainty that he'd show up and guarantee the right number of deaths?

If powerful occult practitioners really did have the ability to invoke demons and receive reliable information about future events, then not much about any of that seems too implausible to me.

Perhaps 52 innocent victims was the target, and the extra 4 terrorists, being complicit in the ritual itself (albeit under the impression that they were participating in a training exercise) were irrelevant to that.


Link.

I'm just nominating the two highlighted paragraphs. The idea that the murderous occultists who secretly rule the world would run computer simulations to help make sure they don't kill too many people in a blood sacrifice for an aging British queen's jubilee is about the stupidest thing I've ever heard.
 
This is good news indeed. The truth Movement can only advance from this. Even this no doubt sanitised version will contain information they did not intend to make known. That's the benefit of having hundreds of thusands if not millions of dedicated researchers all around the world.

You debunkers can see if you can find something too though from long experience we will look very carefully at whatever you find. We don't trust anything about the 9/11 commission report as you know.

Bolded and underlined.
Similar to CIA trustwortiness...
 
Hey everyone! I rather unexpectedly discovered a nomination in an interesting corner of the internet - craigslist discussions. The poster seems to have the same arrogance and idiocy as regular truthers, however the talking points are a bit antiquated.

link: http://philadelphia.craigslist.org/pol/1250859204.html

post in its entirety:
if you believe your government is telling the truth and you really think terrorists had anything to do with 9/11. Your completely emotionally blinded by your government or you literally a complete retard. Go understand basic physics and you will realize there is just way to many first times for a collapsing skyscrapers. Example: each tower fell in less than 10 seconds (supposedly a "pancake collapse"). Now try and clap your hands 110 times in 10 seconds. Bring on the crazy talk, I still dont see your evidence.

The half arguments, poor grammar, and truly absurd fallacies are nothing unusual. However, I think with such experimental methodology as "trying to clap your hands 110 times in 10 seconds," this poster is going to be one of the crown jewels of the new independent investigation! Bring on the crazy talk, gubmint!

:boggled:
 
I've got a nice collection of youtube quotes that i've saved for pure hilarity or logic. Youtube is a breeding ground for great stundie quotes.

From the 9/11 Truthinator video - 4th july Parade 9/11Protester ARRESTED.
ApocalypticMovies said:
When molten metal & thermite are buried under tremendous weight the PRESSURE causes the metal to remain molten for WEEKS. If you put ALL that material in a PRESSURIZED chamber it would probably burn for YEARS! Are you saying the video of molten metal at ground zero & the thermal imaging from NASA are lying, too? The thermal imaging shows temperatures of over 1200 degrees burning under the rubble for WEEKS.
Apparently pressure can cause metal to remain molten for weeks or even years. :rolleyes: Logic be damned.
 
I nominate Heiwa for the following post

Consider WTC 1 upper part C as a hen egg and the lower part A as something "stronger" than a hen egg and you are on your way to better understanding reality!

King Heiwa reigns supreme.
 
"I don't see why it's dumb to think that 80% of the population must be killed"

C'est quoi le rapport entre d'un côté des êtres humains qui ont un caractère, des projets et des ambitions et de l'autre côté la science. Qu'est ce qu'il y a d'irrationnel dans le fait que des personnes qui détiennent le pouvoir veulent instaurer une dictature mondiale et éradiquer 80% de la population dans un but de survie écologique et pour conserver ce système qui leur assure leurs pouvoirs. C'est complètement rationnel au contraire.

=>

What's the connection between humans who have feelings, projects and ambitions from one side, and science from the other? What's irrational in the fact that some people who have the power want to settle a worldwide dictatorship and eradicate 80% of the population in the ecological plot to survive and keep that system which guarantees them their powers. It's completely rational.
 
This one doesn't work without context - in fact, it's purely about context - so it won't stand a gun-toting cat in hell's chance of making the finals, but I thought it better to comment on it here rather than further polluting one of the most informative threads the 9/11 CT subforum has had this year. Here's bill smith's response to the release of the 9/11 Commission's records:

This is good news indeed. The truth Movement can only advance from this. Even this no doubt sanitised version will contain information they did not intend to make known. That's the benefit of having hundreds of thusands if not millions of dedicated researchers all around the world.

You debunkers can see if you can find something too though from long experience we will look very carefully at whatever you find. We don't trust anything about the 9/11 commission report as you know.

So what's funny about this? Well, this is bill responding to the OP at post 427 in the thread. Mike Williams has been delving into these records since mid-January, and finding numerous pieces of information that completely blow various truther arguments out of the water, yet bill smith is suddenly (and belatedly) hailing it as a new truther holy grail.

I have an image of him or her, standing at the finish line of a race that was over six months ago, still cheering for the horse that finished in last place.

Dave
 
Here's one that entertained me:
MARK OF THE BEAST said:
NASA IS NOT A PUBLIC ORGANIZATION. READ THEIR CHARTER. THEY ARE PART OF THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX. THEY WENT TO THE MOON ONCE AND DID NOT LIKE WHAT THEY FOUND. THEIR DESTINY. WHY DO YOU THINK THEY NEVER WENT BACK. THE MOON IS HOLLOW, NOT A MOON AT ALL. A SPACE STATION BUILT BY THE BOYS ZACHARIA SITCHENS WROTE ABOUT. HUMANS WERE TOLD TO GET OFF AND STAY OFF. DURING TRANSMISSIONS BETWEEN THE MOON LANDING CRAFT AND HOUSTON CONTROL THE CODE WORD FOR ALIEN SIGHTING WAS SANTA CLAUSE. WHENEVER A CRAFT WAS SIGHTED SHADOWING THE LUNAR MODULE THE ASTRONAUT WOULD RADIO THAT THEY HAVE SIGHTED SANTA AND HIS REINDEERS IF MORE THAN ONE UFO CRAFT. THIS IS TRUTH.
link
Unfortunately, this one's in the middle of the comments somewhere. Best to search by a couple words in the quote if you want to see the original. Emphasis mine, ALLCAPS original.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom