July 2007 Stundie Nominations

I also nominate this stinker by notorious rabbit cage arsonist, Spooked911's new best friend:

As such, every time we look up in the sky, we see *something* that is individually generated within our own mental psyches. We attribute this to being the "moon" in orbit around the sky, but the aforementioned alien race wanted us to *think* there was one so when they returned in the year 2056 (google Anipoid Race Returns To Earth) they can do so in a space vehicle of their own that *resembles* the moon so we will not be alarmed. :

Yes, programmed into our psyche, GENETICALLY. Plus, those damn computers are ALSO programmed to see this thing, as are our cameras.
 
Pdoh got banned from yet another site and is throwing a tantrum worthy of a 4 year old rich girl who didn't get a pony. I was gonna post it but it's more sad than funny.:(

Is p'doh posting as revolution91 on the loosechange forum?

And please like Travis I am a big fan of Schadenfreude so post it up.
 
Is p'doh posting as revolution91 on the loosechange forum?

And please like Travis I am a big fan of Schadenfreude so post it up.


No, R91 is an incredibly hypocritical 15 year old "Youth for Truth" who once had the gall to come here and complain about non-existant death threats from JREFers, whilst cheering on Jackchits death threat to Gravy, while sporting an avatar which depicted violence(against Gravy, of course).
 
Is p'doh posting as revolution91 on the loosechange forum?

And please like Travis I am a big fan of Schadenfreude so post it up.



PD'oh's new name over there is j911ob, I think.
 
No, R91 is an incredibly hypocritical 15 year old "Youth for Truth" who once had the gall to come here and complain about non-existant death threats from JREFers, whilst cheering on Jackchits death threat to Gravy, while sporting an avatar which depicted violence(against Gravy, of course).

Head in hands. I've been arguing with a child? He was what? 9, when Sept 11th happened. Jesus wept, my wife is right, I need to get out of this nonsense.

Do you have a link for the threat thread here?

I've not been banned from loose change for a whole two days, I'm posting as wizard of Oz, Dylan went to literally "play outdoors" when I called him on his simile, and revolution91 shut up when I called him a callous borderline sociopath when I suggested photos of bodies at Shanksville shouldn't be released for the sake of the families, and he laughed at me.
 
Head in hands. I've been arguing with a child? He was what? 9, when Sept 11th happened. Jesus wept, my wife is right, I need to get out of this nonsense.

I've not been banned from loose change for a whole two days, I'm posting as wizard of Oz, Dylan went to literally "play outdoors" when I called him on his simile, and revolution91 shut up when I called him a callous borderline sociopath when I suggested photos of bodies at Shanksville shouldn't be released for the sake of the families, and he laughed at me.


Yeah, the kid's pretty messed up. Unless he grows out of this conspiradork phase he's in - and soon - I think his chances to lead a normal life are pretty poor and getting worse by the day. Kinda feel sorry for him.

Do you have a link for the threat thread here?


Unfortunately, no. He only posted a handful of times and the mods moved the whole thread to AAH, so it's all gone.
 


That's not the one I was referring to. I was talking about the Jackchit "...the last thing you ever see...." death threat from a couple months back. After voicing his support for whatever jackchit should do, young R91 actually registered here to condemn us eebil JREFers for supporting death threats(that noone supported) made by a JREFer(who actually wasn't/isn't a JREFer).

It was quite amazing to see the combination of hypocracy, lack of a sense of irony, and extremely poor researching skills......

edit: this was the quote from Revolutionary91

"Jack, I'm going to be real with you. If you were to something to Gravy or that JREF (Hey JREF's...noticed I said IF) it would be 100% o.k. in my book, but I know that one action of a member in a group can determine oh so much. I know how much you want to go hunt someone down and get payback but trust me when I say this:

Wait for the release of LC:FC

If you do something rash now it can really hurt our credibilty.

Patience, our time will come.
"

And his avatar:

dylanowninggravyrm3.gif


Original LC thread gone, but the discussion is here
 
Last edited:
"Jack, I'm going to be real with you. If you were to something to Gravy or that JREF (Hey JREF's...noticed I said IF) it would be 100% o.k. in my book, but I know that one action of a member in a group can determine oh so much. I know how much you want to go hunt someone down and get payback but trust me when I say this:

Wait for the release of LC:FC

If you do something rash now it can really hurt our credibilty.

Patience, our time will come.
"

Wow. Today the part of creepy teenage psychopath will be played by revolution911.

There's a Harris or a Klebold in the making.
 
No, R91 is an incredibly hypocritical 15 year old "Youth for Truth" who once had the gall to come here and complain about non-existant death threats from JREFers, whilst cheering on Jackchits death threat to Gravy, while sporting an avatar which depicted violence(against Gravy, of course).

He was 15!!!??!!

So... he..... 15!!!

Suddenly so much makes so much sense that before was just impenetrably impossibly baffling.
 
This is from EugeneAxeman on the colboard.

http://www.colboard.com/viewtopic.php?t=24717&start=42

This tells me that the technology to create small nuclear devices is strong possibility.

...

It would only require about a dozen of them in each tower to produce the demolition witnessed....
The first sentence is really only necessary to tell you what "them" means in the second. Perhaps a more pithy nomination would be:

It would only require about a dozen of [these small nuclear devices] in each tower to produce the demolition witnessed...
 
I’m not nominating this, but look-up’s paranoid and conspiratorial defence of Jackchit’s latest delusional fantasy is worth a laugh:

look-up @ LCF said:
What if he isn't posting to either forum? What if someone, perhaps JREF or perhaps paid cointelpro, has hijacked his account and is now posting things and making up stories specifically to ensight possible violence, or at least, a lot of disruption between our two forums?

Personally, I've noticed that we've been getting alone better in the past couple months. So perhaps this wave of accusations and insults is specifically meant to create problems where there were none?
 
Killer, killer material from Mr. 3rd-person!

That is why we bright guys look at EVIDENCE - ESECIALLY ANOMALOUS EVIDENCE - such as the metal-fire in WTC2/Column301/Floor81 - and put forth explanations - models - hypothesies - cartoons - metaphors - pictures - stories - myths - to explain what even NIST fails to explain.
 
Id like to nominate this as a case study in bias from PhantomWolf

And your point? Richard Hoagland believes in massive glass tunnels, buried citys, pyraimds and huge carved faces on Mars, as well as robots, machines, glass cities, and other alien structures on the Moon, that serveral of the moons of Jupiter and Saturn are either artifical or have alien structures on them, and that Washington DC was all laid out in accordance to masonic symbolism. He also does a very good page[/url] proving that those that believe that the Apollo programme was hoaxed are nutty than he is. Sometimes the insane can be right, just like a broken clock manages to be correct twice a day.

It was a response to me claiming we shouldn't trust Judy Wood's work on aluminium given that she thinks energy beams brought down the towers.
 
Id like to nominate this as a case study in bias from PhantomWolf

It was a response to me claiming we shouldn't trust Judy Wood's work on aluminium given that she thinks energy beams brought down the towers.
What? He is saying Judy Wood could be right, not that she is not a nut case on 9/11 stuff. Her beam weapon is total stupid, and can be confirmed if you do the energy required to dustify all the steel in the WTC as just one reason. But how do you know her rant of Al is not correct?

This may not be a very good stundie nomination.
 
Id like to nominate this as a case study in bias from PhantomWolf



It was a response to me claiming we shouldn't trust Judy Wood's work on aluminium given that she thinks energy beams brought down the towers.

Wrong thread. Perhaps you should take a few minutes and look into what the Stundies threads are for.

And, by the way, you shouldn't trust anything that Judy Wood says without confirming it via other sources. She's a barking lunatic.
 

Back
Top Bottom