<Snipped>
But, there was a thread that I seem to recall that dealt with the issue of
DEBRIS HEIGHT at Ground Zero. As I recall it, that thread caused, shall we say, quite a stir around here. For my part, suffice it to say, the evidence in support of the claim
ground zero was flattened, thus confirming, among other things, that the steel had been pulverized and turned to dust, was rather overwhelming.
Did you participate in that food for thought fest, carlitos?
Well, guess what, friend, amongst the newly released ABC stash of photos are those that further confirm that GROUND ZERO WAS FLAT. So much so that, in fact, ABC had to construct a propaganda layer claiming the photos show a debris pile when, in fact, the photos plainly show the opposite.
Here's where to begin and an excerpt:
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/sept...tos-new-york-fire-department/story?id=9819500
"They show, among other things, firefighters climbing atop the massive piles of rubble in darkness, hours before large generator-powered lights were brought in to the scene. Some photos offer a close-up look at the massive debris filling lower Manhattan streets. Others show the thick gray ash and countless pages of white office paper that settled over the devastated area."
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/slideshow?id=9817532
The actual slide show confirms just the opposite of the above propaganda. Here's but 1 example:
[qimg]http://a.abcnews.com/images/Politics/ht_09ffcotten%20_wtc_100212_ssv.jpg[/qimg]
the firefighters are on the ground, as is the apparatus, of course, AND, the fire hoses are pointed downward! That is the opposite of the false claim that sounds, at first glance as if heights are being scaled:
"... firefighters climbing atop the massive piles of rubble..."
You see, carlitos, there was never any need for me to declare 'victory" or to assert "I am right, you are wrong" or anything like that. All we need do here is LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE.
Here's one more for your consideration of the fact that ground zero was flat:
[qimg]http://a.abcnews.com/images/Politics/ht_fdny1820_11_100212_ssv.jpg[/qimg]
This one's pretty interesting because it reveals that the iconic one, shot from an angle and looking up makes it seem as if there's height when, in reality, there was none. You remember that iconic photo that tried to give the impression (false) of height don't you? Or, do you want me to post it up next to the one shown above, showing gz was flat as a pancake?
