Judd v. Obama (Orly Taitz)

I'm betting the answer to your musing is found somewhere between "never" and "when a flying pig starts throwing snowballs in hell".

Orly's law craptice is founded on regurgitating every batguano crazy conspiracy theory in every filing; I truly believe that she is under the impression that the more pages she submits, the greater her chance of finding that elusive "honest" judge.
 
Agatha said:
I truly believe that she is under the impression that the more pages she submits, the greater her chance of finding that elusive "honest" judge.
Click to expand...

That certainly resonates with the specific instructions some judges have given her, limiting the number of pages she may submit. Even though I'm not a lawyer, I understand why certain filings must contain certain boilerplate in order to be valid, even though it bloats the document with stuff I consider uninteresting. Orly doesn't seem to understand that. Not only does she bloat her documents with conspiracy twaddle, she often omits the necessary boilerplate. I seem to recall at least some of her cases being dismissed for malformed filings.
 
One person to whom she submitted her crap to called it an: "inartfully collated, defectively stapled, and misordered collection of pages."
 
You don't need law school to learn how to follow basic procedural rules. A competent paralegal should be able to handle it.
 
here is a screen shot from her web site today.

radio_zps525bbda7.png
 
abaddon said:
Not awfully familiar with US law, but doesn't that amount to a judge in court actually ordering "Do your own research"?
Click to expand...

No, it's not about research. She's not following basic rules about how to file motions, communicate with the court, etc. It's hard to get more incompetent.
 
abaddon said:
Not awfully familiar with US law, but doesn't that amount to a judge in court actually ordering "Do your own research"?
Click to expand...

Worse, It's a judge telling a lawyer: "Learn the basic rules of your profession."


ETS: Dang, beaten to the draw.
 
Last edited:
NotJesus said:
No, it's not about research. She's not following basic rules about how to file motions, communicate with the court, etc. It's hard to get more incompetent.
Click to expand...

Alferd_Packer said:
Worse, It's a judge telling a lawyer: "Learn the basic rules of your profession."


ETS: Dang, beaten to the draw.
Click to expand...

Alferd_Packer said:
On top of that, a couple weeks back, Taitz ran around Washington handing out "subloenas" (her word) to various Congresscritters.

The Office of General Council responded with a nice FOAD letter.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/131130618...nsel-of-the-US-Congress-to-Taitz-Re-Subpoenas
Click to expand...

And there you go. Taitz seems to be, well to me anyhoo, utterly misguided. As I said, US law is unfamiliar to me, but is largely derived from UK law. In any event, the whole Taitz malarkey seems unlikely to gain any traction. Why on earth does she keep on doing it? I really wonder. It is an effort with no point, no result and no meaning. A few years hence, will she continue to harass an ex-president? I think she very well might. To what end and purpose? I dunno.
 
abaddon said:
And there you go. Taitz seems to be, well to me anyhoo, utterly misguided. As I said, US law is unfamiliar to me, but is largely derived from UK law. In any event, the whole Taitz malarkey seems unlikely to gain any traction. Why on earth does she keep on doing it? I really wonder. It is an effort with no point, no result and no meaning. A few years hence, will she continue to harass an ex-president? I think she very well might. To what end and purpose? I dunno.
Click to expand...

At this point, it's become the farcial equivalent of a NASCAR race.

Orly keeps going around and around in circles while refusing to acknowledge that her "racecar" has lost all four wheels and has the engine on fire. Quite frankly, I think she may suffer from some form of mental disorder; there's really no other explanation for her persistent pursuit of a futile case. As Albert Einstein famously once said, "insanity is doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results." If that doesn't describe Orly, I don't know what does.
 
Alferd_Packer said:
Orly posted the following on her blog:

(I am not providing a link, to protect the innocent)
Quote:
I called the USA Today at the number above and the secretary answering the phone told me that they will not be interested in publishing a story about forgery in Obama’s IDs. I asked her to transfer me to an employee, who is not criminally complicit in elections fraud. They are still looking…
Click to expand...
I don't know if she is actually trying to be funny on purpose on not, but that is hilarious in a way that she would never understand.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
It's on her website, so there's no reason to hide her identity.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=371557
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom