Judd v. Obama (Orly Taitz)

She also hasn't got the hang of the word 'sentence'.

neonzx at Fogbow has provided a link to a copy of her five page, one sentence per point filing. :rolleyes:

Just a word of caution - contains evidence of 'pornography', so it could be NSFW.
 
Laurie Roth expands on why she should be allowed to drop out of the MS case:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/114932196/MS-ECF-75-TvDPM-Laurie-Roth-Letter-to-the-Court

Of course, she doesn't mention when that accident took place: In 2005. And she's been trying to "build back her radio show" since 2006... :rolleyes:

I really hope the Judge goes to town on her.

She seemed well enough to attend the Constitution Party's debate in Michigan in March, and was fully prepared to travel to Nashville if she got the nomination.

Reading her Amazon bio, shows that she's lying:

Laurie Roth is regularly asked to speak at national conventions and has been asked the last two years to Emcee at the largest conservative conference in the country, CPAC.

Laurie Roth has a Ph.D. in counseling and a black belt in Tae Kwon Do. If she can't reason with you, you had better duck before the roundhouse kick sends you flying!

She also enjoys running, hikes, NASCAR, loves riding her motorcycle and is happy on horseback.

I hope the Judge finds out about this, and that she gets what is coming to her.
 
Oh it has just gotten a whole lot better. Leah Lax wants out, she wants out now, and she's taking Orly down with her (and manage to libel users of the Fogbow as well as the defense cousel in the process):
MOTION to Remove Leah Lax from the Entire Lawsuit and MOTION to Sanction Orly Taitz, filed by Leah Lax
http://www.scribd.com/doc/115024444...tion-to-Remove-Lax-and-to-Sanction-Orly-Taitz

Exhibits A-D
http://www.scribd.com/doc/115024717/Ms-2012-11-30-ECF-76-1-TvDPM-Exhibit-A
http://www.scribd.com/doc/115024729/Ms-2012-11-30-ECF-76-2-TvDPM-Exhibit-B
http://www.scribd.com/doc/115024746/Ms-2012-11-30-ECF-76-3-TvDPM-EXHIBIT-C
http://www.scribd.com/doc/115024769/Ms-2012-11-30-ECF-76-4-TvDPM-EXHIBIT-D
 
Oh it has just gotten a whole lot better. Leah Lax wants out, she wants out now, and she's taking Orly down with her (and manage to libel users of the Fogbow as well as the defense cousel in the process):
MOTION to Remove Leah Lax from the Entire Lawsuit and MOTION to Sanction Orly Taitz, filed by Leah Lax
http://www.scribd.com/doc/115024444...tion-to-Remove-Lax-and-to-Sanction-Orly-Taitz

Exhibits A-D
http://www.scribd.com/doc/115024717/Ms-2012-11-30-ECF-76-1-TvDPM-Exhibit-A
http://www.scribd.com/doc/115024729/Ms-2012-11-30-ECF-76-2-TvDPM-Exhibit-B
http://www.scribd.com/doc/115024746/Ms-2012-11-30-ECF-76-3-TvDPM-EXHIBIT-C
http://www.scribd.com/doc/115024769/Ms-2012-11-30-ECF-76-4-TvDPM-EXHIBIT-D

This is priceless stuff!!

She also managed to miss out the most important item required by the Judge, which I believe was a doctors letter.

Has MacLeran managed to get off the commode long enough to send in his 'my dog ate my homework' reply?

Anything from the defence, or are they waiting for everybody to reply before burying them?

Checking Orly's site, it seems that she's as yet unaware to the fact that she's in a large hole with sewerage slowly rising. I can't wait to see her reaction to being thrown under the bus.
 
The MS SoS filed a brief in support of their previous motion for a JoP, attempting to make heads and tails of Orly's RICO brief:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/115029966...S-Supplemental-Brief-in-Support-of-JOP-Motion


Thanks for that. I feel their pain. I often find it difficult to write a brief in response to utter batcrap crazy nonsense filed by a nutter in a case because what you really want to write is just, "Everything that the plaintiffs have submitted is completely batcrap crazy, wholly inapplicable, and utterly irrelevant. The End." but you have to actually respond to the batcrap crazy stuff politely.

I'm sure that brief was a second draft. :D
 
Excellent stuff KD!

Orly has been very quiet about today, but from her latest posing, she knows things look bad.

Really good news: I got a call from the Supreme Court of CA and was told to send my complaint back to them and they will docket it and will submit to the judges of the Supreme Court

Posted on | November 30, 2012 | No Comments

Thank God.

Some good news!

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=363908 (link for the brave)

Also, she's got her hand out for donations again. This cost her $710.

God knows what Mississippi will cost her.
 


Good stuff. (But from reading the exhibits posted earlier, it looks like they got Ms. Lax's email address wrong on this one at the end of the brief regarding service - unless Ms. Lax has email addresses of both Lealax1234 as well as LeahLax1234, of course. If you're in touch with these folks, you might want to ask them about that point re: service.)



More good stuff. Thanks, KDLarsen!
 
...what you really want to write is just, "Everything that the plaintiffs have submitted is completely batcrap crazy, wholly inapplicable, and utterly irrelevant. The End." but you have to actually respond to the batcrap crazy stuff politely.

But that's the brilliance of the lawyerly arts. It takes an immense amount of talent to say, "Plaintiff is batcrap crazy" in a way that would sound good printed up in a handsome leather-bound volume. But yes, I would love to read a brief just once that contains just the paragraph
1. Plaintiff is clearly bat-crap crazy and should be pilloried.​

With appropriate citations from medieval England.
 
I had been waiting for her to make at least some comment on her website, but I wasn't expecting this so soon. She's certainly full of crazy. Why has she included pages of what looks like Unicode?
 
I had been waiting for her to make at least some comment on her website, but I wasn't expecting this so soon. She's certainly full of crazy. Why has she included pages of what looks like Unicode?
Over on the Fogbow, it was mentioned a few days ago that without the headers, it isn't possible to trace where an email has come from. This was in relation to the accusation by Leah Lax that Fogbow operatives (who are all Muslims, don'cha know) have hacked into her email and moneybookers accounts. As proof of this she attached an email without headers that purported to come from her, which contained a spam link. Yes, the technical knowledge of your average birther is really that bad.

Orly has obviously read that, understood that headers mean 'something' when attaching emails as evidence exhibits, and voila! Six or so page of Unicode.

It's quite funny how Orly uses Fogbow as a education tool and free proofreading service, but a little dangerous, as de-education is just as much fun as education. Not that I'd ever do that, oh no. No. :whistling
 
Orly's been a busy little bee. Not only she waging war against Leah Lax, she's also trying to add a Republican elector (from Minnesota, which went for Obama :boggled:) to her lawsuit in Mississippi, and has just filed not one, but two fresh appeals: One in Taitz v. Obama, et al. in Orange County and one in Judd v. Obama.

Yes, she appealed the case where she got zapped for $4000 for bringing Occidental into it and she's going after them again in the most insane possible way: She read an article in the Oxy student newspaper, where one of their counsels was quoted as saying that they'd show the records if presented with a court order. She promptly dug out a subpoena from Sibley v. Alexander (a case in the DC Superior Court), claims that it's a valid court order, and is now demanding they produce the records she's after :hit:

Oh, and because she's too rule 10 stupid to understand law, she's refusing that $4000 sanction because it's not mentioned in the final order.
 
Orly's been a busy little bee. Not only she waging war against Leah Lax, she's also trying to add a Republican elector (from Minnesota, which went for Obama :boggled:) to her lawsuit in Mississippi, and has just filed not one, but two fresh appeals: One in Taitz v. Obama, et al. in Orange County and one in Judd v. Obama.

Yes, she appealed the case where she got zapped for $4000 for bringing Occidental into it and she's going after them again in the most insane possible way: She read an article in the Oxy student newspaper, where one of their counsels was quoted as saying that they'd show the records if presented with a court order. She promptly dug out a subpoena from Sibley v. Alexander (a case in the DC Superior Court), claims that it's a valid court order, and is now demanding they produce the records she's after :hit:

Oh, and because she's too rule 10 stupid to understand law, she's refusing that $4000 sanction because it's not mentioned in the final order.

That should end well.
 

Back
Top Bottom